Sunday, February 28, 2021

China is paving its 'belt and road' to British Columbia---Site C Dam

China is paving its 'belt and road' to British Columbia

AUGUST 17, 2020

Massive warehouse facility under construction in Surrey underscores China's intention to make Canada a "belt and road" country

Site C Dam BC Canada: What we aren't being told!

Notorious Chinese Firm Wins Role in Site C Construction

BC Hydro awards contract as Ottawa reviews takeover of Canadian company.

2 Jan 2018 


‘Premier Horgan needs to get out of Site C before 30 per cent of the construction falls into the hands of the Chinese.

A notorious Chinese state-owned enterprise now has a 30-per-cent stake in a consortium building Site C dam infrastructure after buying Canadian construction giant Aecon last year.

 The China Communications Construction Co. Ltd. has a history of corruption and workplace safety issues in projects around the world.

Canada’s biggest construction firms have pointed to those issues and especially national security worries in secretly asking the federal government to reject the takeover as not in the national interest.

According to the Globe and Mail a delegation representing firms such as PCL and Ledcor (all Aecon’s competitors) met with senior Ottawa civil servants to lobby the government to block the sale of Aecon to CCCC, one of the world’s largest infrastructure builders.

Representatives from the construction firms argued that as a Chinese-state controlled enterprise CCCC should not be allowed to build sensitive infrastructure projects such as military bases or nuclear power plants.

Aecon, a 140-year-old firm, helped to build such landmarks as the CN Tower, Vancouver’s SkyTrain and the Halifax Shipyards.Last year CCCC International Holdings, an arm of China Communications Construction Co., purchased Aecon, one of Canada’s largest building and engineering firms, for $1.5 billion. The deal is awaiting federal government review under the Investment Canada Act.

Shortly after the CCCC’s purchase of the Canadian company, BC Hydro announced that a partnership led by Aecon Group Inc. had been chosen as the preferred bidder for a Site C generating station and spillways contract. The partnership includes three other companies including Dragados Canada Inc.

Under the Investment Canada Act the federal government must study major purchases of Canadian firms by foreign buyers “that could be injurious to national security.” The Trudeau government has been actively courting Chinese investment and B.C. Premier John Horgan is currently in China on a trade mission aimed at increasing exports and attracting investment.

The purchase of Aecon would not only make CCCC a major player in the controversial Site C dam, but give the firm a chance to bid on an expected $185 billion in infrastructure projects planned by Canadian governments over the next decade.

Former Conservative Foreign Affairs minister Peter MacKay says Ottawa should block the deal, which would funnel profits from public infrastructure projects to the Chinese state.

“If Aecon is acquired by CCCI profits from this taxpayer-funded initiative to build and improve the means to enhance Canada’s economic competitiveness — to build our communities for generations to come — would go directly to the government of China.”

The China-Canada investment treaty, which the former Harper government approved by Order in Council in 2012, would also give the CCCC the right to challenge Canadian legislative, executive or judicial decisions in a secret arbitration process outside of Canada’s legal system.

Green Leader and MP Elizabeth May said the treaty adds to the reasons to block the sale.

“Any Chinese company now has superior rights to a Canadian company,” she said. State-owned enterprises run by China’s government should not be able to challenge or undermine public policy in Canada, May added.

“Premier Horgan needs to get out of Site C before 30 per cent of the construction falls into the hands of the Chinese,” said May, MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, in a Tyee interview.

“CCCC’s poor safety record, weak labour standards and environmental track record should be enough to persuade Premier John Horgan to reverse his ill-advised approval of Site C,” she said.

By any measure the track record of CCCC, like that of many Chinese state-owned enterprises, is bad.

In 2009 the World Bank barred CCCC and its subsidiaries from engaging “in any road and bridge projects financed by the World Bank Group” for seven years after an investigation found that the company “participated in a collusive scheme designed to establish bid prices at artificial, non-competitive levels” on a road-building project in the Philippines.

In Sri Lanka the Chinese company has left a legacy of corruption allegations and white-elephant projects that have left the country indebted to the Chinese government.

Concerns have also been raised about a 2016 decision by the Malaysian government to award CCCC a $12.3-billion rail construction contract with no competitive bidding process.

Charges of bribery and corruption have also dogged the company and other Chinese companies in Africa on building projects in Kenya and Tanzania.

Workplace safety, a big problem in China generally, has also been an issue at work sites operated by CCCC.

CCCC, which claims to be “building a connected world” is part of a huge network of companies run by the Communist Party of China largely to advance political goals.

The Globe and Mail reported that CCCC had filed notice with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in October that it was adding a Communist Party section to its corporate structure in which the party “organization shall play the core leadership role and core political role, providing direction, managing the overall situation.”

China’s central government owns 106 companies which have become global giants. Forty-seven of these firms ranked in the 2014 Fortune Global 500. At the end of 2013 these state-owned enterprises controlled more than $5.6 trillion in assets, including more than $690 billion in investments abroad.

A 2016 report in Asia Policy described China’s state-owned enterprises as “long plagued by declining performance, rising debt, and serious corruption.”

Lu Shaye, China’s ambassador to Canada, describes the purchase of Aecon as “a very normal business transaction” and says there is no need for a national security review.

But in the National Post, Jack Mintz, a fellow at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, wrote last year that “The last thing Canada should be doing is allowing foreign SOEs to renationalize our industry, making us poorer and weaker for it.”

John Beck, Aecon’s CEO, has tried to assure Canadians that the company will retain its Canadian headquarters, values and employees under Chinese control.

But MacKay notes that Diane Francis, a well-known journalist, has long argued that Canada should not approve Chinese takeovers because Chinese firms don’t play by the rules.

In one article she wrote that “China’s track record in Canada is abysmal and includes a request to the Supreme Court of Canada, by a Chinese engineering giant a handful of years ago, to exempt it from our laws after it breached safety violations and ignored our courts following workers’ deaths. The Court refused to hear the case. Fines were never paid.”

Francis is also Beck’s spouse. 

Indigenous leaders protest Site C dam

First Nations representatives from across B.C. were joined by dozens of concerned citizens for a rally highlighting the dangers of BC Hydro's new energy project.

UBCIC President Grand Chief Stewart Phillip demonstrates against the construction of the Site C dam outside BC Hydro's office in downtown Vancouver on Wed. Nov. 18, 2015. 

Dozens of demonstrators gathered outside BC Hydro's downtown Vancouver office on Wednesday afternoon waving signs and beating drums in protest of the company's controversial Site C dam.  

Construction of the $9-billion hydroelectric project started in July. Upon completion, the dam will produce enough power to light up roughly 450,000 B.C. homes per year.

While the dam is strongly supported by the Clark government, its reservoir would also obliterate 107 kilometres of river valley bottoms along the Peace River and its tributaries. First Nations say this will result in the permanent loss of vital hunting, fishing and gathering sites.

‘Nothing should be kept secret’: B.C. First Nation asks court to order release of Site C dam safety documents

Site C construction continues at an estimated cost of $3 million a day amid growing concerns about the stability of the dam and secrecy from BC Hydro and the B.C. government, which is withholding a recent status report on the over-budget project from the public

A Treaty 8 First Nation is going to court seeking the release of all documents related to significant geotechnical problems and safety risks at the troubled Site C dam under construction on B.C.’s Peace River.  

West Moberly First Nations announced Monday it is seeking an order to obtain detailed information about geotechnical issues that require shoring up the dam structure, powerhouse and spillways, which are being built on a “weak foundation,” according to documents obtained by The Narwhal.

The nation is also asking the B.C. Supreme Court to order the release of the government-commissioned Peter Milburn report on the status of the over-budget project, as well as all documents shared with two international safety experts who are reviewing a surprise “fix” to the dam’s stability issues proposed by BC Hydro.  

“Site C is a public infrastructure project,” said Roland Willson, chief of West Moberly First Nations, which has a pending Treaty Rights case against the dam. “And everything should be above board. We should see all the information about what’s going on.  Nothing should be kept secret, especially when it has a possible effect on Treaty Rights.”

“They take their documents and then they go and hide behind closed doors and leak out little pieces of information that they deem fit to release. That’s not right.” 

Tim Thielmann, legal counsel for West Moberly First Nations, said the nation is requesting a hearing take place within the next two weeks on urgent grounds and that the documents be released within seven days after the hearing. A tufa seep in the Peace River Valley

Clearing for the Site C dam has destroyed beautiful and rare hillside wetlands called tufa seeps in the Peace River Valley. The seeps likely took thousands of years to form, making them older than the Hanging Gardens of Babylon and the Great Wall of China. The largest tufa seeps had chambers the size of rooms. Photo: Garth Lenz / The Narwhal

BC Hydro classified the Site C dam’s overall health as “red” in December 2019, meaning the project is in serious trouble, yet construction has continued shrouded in secrecy, Thielmann pointed out.  

“There’s absolutely no plans made public about what the solutions to these structural problems might be, what the costs of any of the solutions or options might be, what the schedule implications of any of those solutions or options might be, and whether any of them can be completed safely,” Thielmann said in an interview.

“And yet the project continues to chug along at $3 million a day, destroying the heartland of my clients, West Moberly First Nations, who live and rely on these lands for their way of life.”

Chief Willson said bulldozers are “ripping up the valley” even though there is no certainty that the Site C dam can ever be safely completed. 

“They’ve destroyed unbelievable habitat,” he said. “The ecosystem that’s here was unique … We’ve lost old-growth forests in the valley, specific medicines that were in the valley, they’ve pretty much stripped the whole thing.”

“If people don’t live here, they don’t see what’s happening. The displacement of wildlife here is unbelievable.” 

Nation may seek an injunction to stop Site C dam construction

In an open letter to Premier John Horgan and his cabinet, released Monday, West Moberly First Nations warns it is also “actively considering” a return to court to seek a new injunction to stop work on the dam until cabinet makes a final determination about whether or not to proceed with the project, which the nation calls “unsafe, unnecessary and unlawful.”

The court denied the nation’s previous injunction application in October 2018 but said a new injunction could be granted if there were an “unforeseen and compelling change in circumstances” before a landmark Treaty Rights trial is scheduled to begin in March 2022.

West Moberly First Nations alleges that the Site C dam and two previous dams on the Peace River constitute an unjustifiable infringement of its Treaty Rights. 

The Site C dam will flood 128 kilometres of the river and its tributaries, destroying important Indigenous cultural and spiritual sites and the last tract of the Peace River Valley available for traditional practices such as hunting, trapping and fishing, while also poisoning bull trout and other food fish with methylmercury. 

Last July, when the B.C. government disclosed the geotechnical problems in a hasty press conference at the start of the mid-summer long weekend, Energy Minister Bruce Ralston announced the appointment of Milburn, a former B.C. deputy finance minister, to write an “independent report” on the project. Milburn submitted his report before the Christmas holidays, but the government has not released it.

In a surprise statement in January, Horgan said the government has appointed two international dam safety experts to assess a solution to the geotechnical problems proposed by BC Hydro and would release Milburn’s report once the experts had completed their work. He did not provide a timeline.

“The fix that’s been proposed by [BC] Hydro, we’re now asking for two other opinions on the efficacy of that fix,” Horgan told reporters. “That’s not to say that Milburn’s report isn’t comprehensive, but it is appropriate that we make sure that the fix that is being proposed to the geotechnical challenge is going to be safe.” 

Fall foliage around Moberly River

The area around the Moberly River, which provided habitat for at risk species such as the fisher, was a culturally and spiritually important place for Treaty 8 First Nations. The old-growth forest around the mouth of the Moberly River, which will be flooded by the Site C dam’s reservoir, was clear-cut by BC Hydro. Photo: Garth Lenz / The Narwhal

Former BC Hydro CEO Marc Eliesen said Milburn’s appointment was a “smokescreen” for continuing construction on the project — with no certainty the dam can ever be finished — while the government called a fall election one year ahead of schedule in the hope of securing a majority NDP government.

“They have no intention whatsoever of stopping,” Eliesen, who is also the former chair and CEO of Ontario Hydro and the Manitoba Energy Authority, said in an interview.

“This is part of the ongoing deception that both the government and BC Hydro have been practicing on the citizens of B.C.”

Eliesen said it was clear from the start that Milburn did not have the expertise to assess the Site C dam’s geotechnical issues — something Horgan confirmed at a media availability on Jan 14. 

“What he [Milburn] could do, and probably what he has done, is put [together] a summary of what BC Hydro thinks the cost will be with the new fix and how it will impact the schedule … That’s something any consultant can do. But he didn’t have the background or the technical ability to assess anything related to the stability of the foundation.”

Eliesen said it’s telling that the government will not release the terms of reference for either the Milburn report or the report commissioned from the two independent dam safety experts, Norwegian Kaare Hoeg and John France, an independent consultant who used to work for California-based Aecom, a former BC Liberal Party donor. Aecom has received at least $674,000 in no-bid Site C dam contracts for providing an “independent construction advisor” and the services of its program manager Joe Ehasz, who sits on the Site C project’s technical advisory board. 

In an affidavit, West Moberly First Nations demands the government release any terms of reference or supporting documents from the safety reports, any draft of the safety reports or communications that related to them, briefing notes and notes to cabinet and recommendations related to the safety reports.

The nation’s demand comes one week after residents of Old Fort, a riverside community near the dam construction site that has suffered two major landslides since 2018, launched a class action lawsuit against the B.C. government, local government and BC Hydro, saying it was foreseeable that Site C construction would cause or contribute to a landslide. The allegations have not been proven in court. 

‘We are hemorrhaging public funds’

Eliesen said revelations last summer that water is seeping into huge amounts of concrete that have been poured on the Site C dam’s south bank, where the spillways and powerhouse will be located, are deeply disturbing. 

“It’s the foundation for the spillway and for the structure for the turbines and generators. And you’re saying that it’s shaky? That the water has seeped in? That’s a calamity.”

Thielmann said the geotechnical issues constitute the “unforeseen and compelling change in circumstances” that would allow West Moberly First Nations to request an injunction to stop work on the project. 

Horgan has mused publicly about cancelling the project on at least two occasions and the government stated in a press release that the geotechnical problems constitute a new challenge for the project, originally scheduled for completion in 2024, Thielmann pointed out. 

“This is a fundamentally major re-think of the project itself,” he said. “We are hemorrhaging public funds and destroying sacred land on a project that may not be completed. I can’t think of a more substantial or compelling change in the status of the project.” 

In a press release, West Moberly First Nations noted that BC Hydro is withholding its two latest quarterly Site C dam progress reports from the B.C. Utilities Commission. BC Hydro has also not answered the commission’s detailed questions about the project, which include querries about geotechnical issues and no-bid contracts.

close up of old-growth cottonwood tree

Old-growth cottonwoods along Moberly River provided important habitat for species vulnerable to extinction, such as the fisher. The cottonwoods were logged to make way for a Site C dam waste rock dump. Photo: Garth Lenz / The Narwhal

An October investigation by The Narwhal revealed that senior officials in the B.C. government knew about the dam’s weak foundation in May 2019, more than one year before the information was shared with the public, the de facto owners of the dam. 

In the open letter, Chief Willson urged Horgan to follow through with the government’s promise to implement the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and to uphold rights guaranteed by Treaty 8. 

“You can reject the madness of ploughing ahead with this unnecessary, unsafe, and unlawful project,” the letter said. 

“You can choose instead to immediately suspend the project. You can work with West Moberly and other Indigenous treaty partners to provide truly clean energy alternatives that meet the needs of all British Columbians. You can show Canada and the world that the only way to escape our colonial history of neglect and betrayal is to act boldly and honourably in the decisions that lie before us today.”

Prophet River First Nation also filed a civil action alleging that the Site C dam and two previous dams on the Peace River constituted an unjustifiable violation of Treaty Rights. The Nation withdrew its civil claim last year after reaching a settlement with the B.C. government and BC Hydro, saying the Site C project had been approved without its free, prior and informed consent and had “painfully impacted” Treaty 8 nations.

Other Treaty 8 members who were previously opposed to the dam have signed impact benefits and land transfer agreements with the B.C. government and BC Hydro that provide for lump sum and annual payments, along with contract work on the project.

A Joint Review Panel that examined the project for the B.C. and federal governments concluded the impacts of the dam on First Nations traditional land use would likely be adverse, significant and impossible to mitigate.

The B.C. government did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. The government does not normally comment on matters before the courts.