Wednesday, August 26, 2026

New Poll Shows Shocking Result: People Like China More Than the US

 

New Poll Shows Shocking Result: People Like China More Than the US

Some may find it hard to believe, but according to a new Pew Research poll, China is seen more favorably than America. Of course, there’s a good deal of politics at play, but there may also be more behind the scenes – the power of Hollywood.

America vs China

The July survey consisted of more than 42,000 people in 36 countries, and for the first time in 20 years since Pew started polling this topic, China came out on top. The US is viewed more positively than China in only six countries: India, Israel, Japan, Philippines, Poland, and South Korea. Even America’s closest neighbors, Mexico and Canada, favor China.

What has caused the US to be overshadowed by a communist country? A big portion of it, according to Pew, is the loss of trust in America, including its president. As the Council of Foreign Relations explained, “across the twenty countries Pew has tracked annually since 2023, median confidence in Chinese President Xi Jinping now exceeds confidence in U.S. President Donald Trump by ten points.” 

In Sweeden, 83% considered the US a reliable partner in 2022, but this year that dropped dramatically to just 31%. Canada’s trust fell, too, from 83% to 35%. It’s not all because socialism is good and Orange Man is bad. Several things have helped China improve its image. For instance, its culture and products such as video games and social media trends have gained international popularity. Of course, there’s also China’s technical achievements, including electric vehicles and high-speed rail.

Other political issues had a hand in the turnover, though, including a negative feeling toward tariffs and the war in Iran. But politics is only one aspect. According to Chris Fenton’s op ed in RealClear Politics, Americans, especially Tinsel Town, have been hyping up the Red Dragon while continuing to highlight America’s faults.

It’s All About the Money

What does China have to do with Hollywood? Quite a bit, according to Fenton. In fact, he feels their influence and pressure are powerful, and that’s why people and countries are looking more favorably on the red country. He wrote:

“The single most influential reason China looks better to the world than the United States is that Western media, Hollywood, journalists, multinational corporations, sports leagues, politicians, and cultural institutions have been systematically unable, or unwilling, to portray China in any meaningfully negative light. Beijing made the rules clear: Criticize us, depict our system honestly, or even hint at Taiwan’s separate status, and you lose access to the world’s largest consumer market. The penalty for disobedience is banishment.”

Fenton based this on his 17 years serving as president of a studio’s motion picture division where he helped pioneer the opening of China’s market to Hollywood. “We told ourselves we were spreading American soft power, building domestic GDP, and creating cultural glue between superpowers,” he explained, but the opposite was true. According to him, several movie scripts were changed so as to not offend China. He used various examples such as Looper, which originally placed Bruce Willis and Joseph Gordon Levitt to France, but instead the plot was changed so that it took place in Shanghai, and the script “even added lines that made China the envy of the world.” Another example was Iron Man 3, which he said “received heavy Chinese brand integration and a heroic, best-in-the-world Chinese scientist.” Red Dawn originally had China as the invader, “Sony and MGM reshot it – under the angry demands of Beijing – replacing the PLA with North Korea’s military as the enemy.” And Top Gun: Maverick received special treatment as well. Paramount removed Taiwan and Japan flags from Tom Cruise’s jacket “—not just for Chinese screens, but for the entire world,” he said. “These were not isolated creative choices. They were the price of admission.”

And it’s not just Hollywood. As Fenton explained further, Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey found himself in trouble in 2019 when he tweeted support for Hong Kong. “The NBA faced an immediate and severe market freeze. Players and executives quickly learned the lesson: Stay silent on Beijing’s red lines or watch billions of dollars vanish.” Marriott had to change its global maps and websites after listing Taiwan and Tibet as separate entities: “its Chinese sites were shut down until the company publicly affirmed Beijing’s territorial claims.” Furthermore:

“Industry leaders like JP Morgan, Burberry, Marriott, American Airlines, and GM and individuals ranging from John Cena to Brad Pitt to Marco Rubio have all absorbed the same message. Speak freely about Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Taiwan, or the CCP’s authoritarian practices, and the market door closes.”

Beijing demands complete global narrative control, and sensitive topics like Chinese villains, human-rights abuses, and politics aren’t tolerated. The US is a different story. Media, entertainment, and politics “relentlessly highlight our polarization, inequality, foreign policy missteps, and institutional failures,” Fenton opined. “That openness is a strength of open societies, but it becomes a strategic liability when the competing power systematically suppresses equivalent scrutiny. The Pew and Gallup numbers are not primarily the product of China’s soft-power genius or America’s recent policy volatility. They are the predictable outcome of a decades-long information asymmetry that we ourselves enforced through commercial fear.”

Truth or not, hearing negative remarks about the US takes its toll. It’s called the illusory truth effect, when repeatedly hearing or seeing a claim makes it seem more believable. A 2024 review in Current Opinion in Psychology found that repetition increases belief not only in ordinary statements but also in misinformation, fake-news headlines, and conspiracy claims. Repetition can increase belief even when a claim conflicts with someone's previous knowledge.

In another study, published by PubMed, experiments were conducted that involved statements being presented as many as 27 times. No surprise that those statements were judged more truthful. But the largest jump in perceived truth happened earlier, after encountering a statement for only the second time.

There was a time when Americans were deeply suspicious of communism, China, and its authoritarian leaders. Those attitudes haven't disappeared, but they have softened as China's global image has improved and America's has taken a beating. Perhaps that's not entirely surprising. When people repeatedly hear what's wrong with America while seeing a carefully polished version of China, eventually some of it may stick. After all, perception isn't always reality, but psychology suggests that repetition can blur the line between the two.

Dont Be Fooled, Proposal for a Bering Strait "Peace Tunnel" is CCP Driven w/a Military Component

Dont Be Fooled, Proposal for a Bering Strait "Peace Tunnel" is CCP Driven w/a Military Component

Aug 11, 2025 

A Bridge for a New Era of International Cooperation

Reports of a possible meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska have sparked renewed discussion about the long-envisioned Bering Strait tunnel, a project seen by many as a potential symbol of peacebuilding and cooperation. Supporters argue that such an intercontinental link between Russia and the United States could serve as both a practical transport route and a gesture toward improved relations.


In a time of renewed calls for stability and constructive engagement, few projects match the symbolic and practical potential of the proposed Bering Strait Peace Tunnel. This rail and infrastructure link connecting Alaska and Russia’s Chukotka region would unite the American and Eurasian continents. According to proponents, it has the potential to mark the beginning of a new era of dialogue and collaboration between the United States, Russia, and other nations, offering a channel for improved communication and cooperation.


The idea of linking Eurasia and North America across the Bering Strait dates back to the late 19th century. In 1890, William Gilpin, the first territorial governor of Colorado, proposed an intercontinental railway with a tunnel under the Bering Strait as part of a global transportation network. Canada also explored northern rail expansion concepts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, such as routes toward Dawson City, which could have been integrated into a wider transcontinental system.


The Russian Czar Nicholas II gave provisional approval in 1905 for exploration of a rail tunnel, but by 1907, amid political instability after the 1905 revolution and fears of American encroachment, his government withdrew support. In 1906, a consortium of Russian, American, and French interests announced an ambitious project, reported in The New York Times, but archival evidence suggests it remained a preliminary concept.


At the 1945 Potsdam Conference, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin proposed to U.S. President Harry Truman that they link their rail networks through a tunnel or bridge, but Truman declined amid Cold War tensions. In the mid-20th century, engineer Tung-Yen Lin promoted the idea of an "Intercontinental Peace Bridge." Joseph Strauss, chief engineer of the Golden Gate Bridge, also publicly discussed the potential of a Bering link.


In 1981, Dr. Sun Myung Moon announced his vision for a Peace Tunnel – an 85-kilometer link under the Bering Strait estimated at US$200 billion at the time – as part of a global peace highway. He reiterated this vision during the 2005 inauguration of the Universal Peace Federation and the inaugural tour through 100 nations. His advocacy was one of several factors that revived interest in the idea. The International Bering Strait Regional Group (IBSRG) and its successor IBSTRG have since provided a multilateral platform for engineers, economists, policymakers, and peace advocates to explore feasibility.

The Council for the Study of Productive Forces (SOPS), a joint body of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Ministry of Economic Development, has been a key driver of the modern Russian rationale for the Bering Strait project. Under academician Alexander Granberg in the 1990s, SOPS coordinated multidisciplinary studies, including aerial route surveys, geotechnical mapping, and energy concepts. The council projected additional benefits such as energy efficiency gains from grid integration and major resource development in the Russian Far East, making SOPS a central knowledge hub in advancing the project in Russia.


In 2014, China’s state-run Beijing Times reported a proposal by Chinese engineers for a high-speed rail line from Beijing to Alaska via a 200-kilometer Bering Strait tunnel, informally dubbed the "China-Russia-Canada-America" route. While not an official government plan, it aligned with China’s Belt and Road vision.


Russia’s Amur–Yakutsk Mainline reaches Nizhny Bestyakh, opposite Yakutsk in the Russian Far East. The rail bridge over the Lena River is under construction (2024–2028), but there are no rail lines east toward Magadan or Chukotka. Extending to the Bering Strait remains a long-held concept, though facing challenges such as permafrost thaw, seismic activity, remoteness, and lack of supporting infrastructure.


From Frontier of Division to Corridor of Peace

Historically a line of separation, the Bering Strait could become a symbol of partnership. The two Diomede Islands – one in U.S. territory and one in Russia – are only about 4 kilometers apart, offering a powerful image of potential reconnection for indigenous communities divided by the Cold War “Ice Curtain.” A tunnel could contribute to dialogue and cooperation, while requiring clear agreements on management, security, and governance involving all stakeholders, including indigenous communities.


During World War II, the Bering Strait region already played a role as a symbolic bridge between the United States and the Soviet Union. Through the Lend-Lease program, American aircraft were flown from Alaska to Siberia via the Alaska–Siberia (ALSIB) route, crossing near the Diomede Islands. These deliveries strengthened the Soviet war effort against Nazi Germany and turned the strait into a gateway of wartime cooperation. For many veterans and historians, it remains a reminder that even in the most difficult times, the two nations found ways to work together toward a common goal.


The proposed 6,000-kilometer intercontinental corridor might integrate electrified rail, power transmission, fiber-optic communications, and possibly pipelines. According to preliminary estimates cited by proponents, the project could cost between US$50 and $100 billion, and potentially generate significant transit revenues. It might shorten travel times between Asia and North America compared to all-water routes via the Suez or Panama Canals. Benefits for remote regions would depend on parallel investment in local infrastructure, and all forecasts remain preliminary. It could also serve as an alternative or complement to the Northern Sea Route during certain seasons.


Skeptics and Challenges

The tunnel’s feasibility faces numerous obstacles. Funding of US$50–100+ billion would require unprecedented international cooperation. While the Bering Strait itself is relatively shallow and stable, the main challenge lies in building thousands of kilometers of access rail through the Arctic tundra with extreme cold (down to –50°C), permafrost, and short construction seasons. Corrosion from saline exposure adds further complexity. Freight volume estimates, such as Russian Railways’ claim that the tunnel could carry 3% of global cargo, are considered overly optimistic by analysts due to cheaper maritime alternatives.


Finally, while Russia has long-term plans to develop transport corridors toward Chukotka, Alaska and Canada currently lack equivalent federal initiatives or funding for connecting infrastructure, creating a significant imbalance in preparedness.


Feasibility and Impact

A functioning link could encourage tourism, cultural exchange, and research collaboration. Electrified rail could reduce emissions compared to shipping, but must incorporate permafrost-stabilization technologies and strict protections for migratory bird routes and marine ecosystems, particularly in the Bering Land Bridge preserve.

Proceeding with the project would require shared funding commitments, rigorous technical studies, and phased implementation. As of 2024, there are no official agreements or dedicated financing, and the political climate presents serious obstacles.


A Call to Visionary Leadership

The Bering Strait Peace Tunnel is not a cure-all, but it could become a practical symbol of what the Universal Peace Federation calls “the hope of reconciling long-separated nations and ideologies” through shared infrastructure. It would require coordinated participation from Canada, Asian partners such as China, Japan, and Korea, potential European or Nordic stakeholders in Arctic development, as well as the United States and Russia.


Governments, international institutions, investors, and civil society are encouraged to consider the Bering Strait Peace Tunnel with clear eyes – recognizing its challenges while exploring its potential. We urge establishing an international technical commission to conduct feasibility studies and foster dialogue beyond current political constraints, determining whether this vision can be transformed into a viable project that benefits all of humanity, with careful verification of historical precedents, technical feasibility studies, and comprehensive assessment of economic and environmental impacts.

August 11, 2025