Are Americans Awakening to the China Threat?
Thursday, 15 Oct 2009 05:10 PM
Chi-Haotian
Chi Haotian: War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century
Leading CCP official argues for exterminating U.S. population
Aug 08, 2005
I began publishing columns about the “China Danger” after unarmed Chinese in the Tiananmen Square in 1989 called for a peaceful limitation of the unlimited power in their country, to which the dictators of China responded with what has been described in the West a “massacre.”
What was a discovery to me? The Chinese will to freedom, which later manifested itself again in dozens of millions of withdrawals from the Chinese Communist Party.
I drew the following conclusion: We can well assume that the only way for the dictators of China to preserve their dictatorship is to conquer the world and thus eliminate those countries whose freedom seduces so many Chinese.
That became a theme of my columns, and I was especially interested in the public speeches of General Chi Haotian, China’s minister of national defense from 1993 to 2003. Pro China Clinton- business deals
He now is 80 years of age, but he still is a top official. In his public speeches, he described China’s global strategy. Between one-third and two-thirds of the population of the United States is to be annihilated (biologically) and their homes and other property are to be transferred to the new Chinese settlers.
One-third of Americans will be left alive to serve this “superior” race. Due to such conquests, China will become a global empire.
Initially, General Chi’s predictions were ignored by many “American experts” and passed off for forgeries and what not. Those experts did not seem to understand that if the rulers of China had regarded Chi’s speeches harmful, not useful, to them, they would have made Chi lie to the West that those speeches of his are criminal forgeries and that he, General Chi Haotian, has nothing to do with them.
Even if we accept the totally improbable version that he refused to obey the rulers of China (and had been properly tortured to death, using the Chinese experience in torture of thousands or millions of years), the rulers of China would have found another way of lying to the West that so-called “Chi’s speeches” were forgeries.
Anyway, recently I have noticed that General Chi’s predictions, which I have quoted in my columns, are being taken seriously by American readers of my weekly columns (while President Obama had declared the dictatorship of China and the United States, as represented by himself, to be “partners” in the 21st century).
Chris Reynolds of Dallas, Texas, begins his almost page-long e-mail to me on Sept. 4, 2009: “Please continue writing your outstanding columns about China and other threats facing the United States. You have a rare talent for writing about complex issues in very clear terms, without hyperbole, so that even the most ignorant or stubborn people should be able to comprehend your writing without misunderstanding.”
The day earlier, Sept. 3, an e-mail to me said: “Keep up the good work,” and the next day, in his page-long e-mail of Sept. 4, David Fellows had this to say: “First of all, let me say that every chance I get I read and enjoy your articles. I thank you for what you do to inform my fellow Americans, many of whom are living in an intellectual fog.
“Unfortunately, the ones who are most in need of your insight are too busy ‘drinking the Kool-aid’ as we sometimes say in our country.”
My column of Sept. 17, 2009, produced a string of e-mails. On Sept.18, Bret Simms wrote: Hello, great article! My only question is why are so many Americans asleep into thinking one day we will not be attacked.
“My opinion is that the U.S government is in some ways provoking an attack which will neutralize the U.S.A. An attack that could take place in mere yrs . . . . I am born and raised U.S. citizen and love my country. The people of THE UNITED STATES I fear are in for a rude awakening. Again great article . . . keep speaking truth!”
The following day, Gregory Camp begins his e-mail, “Dear Mr. Navrozov, I just ‘discovered’ your work and am forwarding your articles to my friends and colleagues. Thank you for bringing this information to the public.”
On Sept. 17, the day the column appeared, I received an e-mail from Darryl Hicks, executive administrator of mybestyears.com: “Chilling! You’ve just put together the most striking column we’ve read.” And then he ends, “We would certainly enjoy putting the spotlight on you and this invaluable column about the Chinese official [General Chi Haotian].”
What’s the conclusion? It seems to me that mentally alert Americans who value the United States for its freedom and all that freedom brings with it, including personal safety from political persecution, and not only for advertised goods and services at the lowest possible prices, are ready to understand that the United States is a country that is being threatened by a war of annihilation, to be accompanied or followed by similar wars of China on all the other free countries less capable of defending themselves.
What is necessary is to make the danger signal reach millions and dozens of millions of Americans as it has reached those whose e-mails I just quoted above.
Several months ago I suggested production of a film on the subject. The donations to our not-for-profit Center for the Survival of Western Democracies, Inc., are tax-deductible.
Alas, I am too busy, writing, to go into the money jungle, so that the center has no money to create a highly professional and successful film explaining the geostrategic situation of today.
France, together with 10 British divisions in France, was overrun by Nazi troops within six weeks. The French culture, with its intellectual sophistication, education, and Napoleon in its military history, did not help to defend the country from the Nazi invasion. Nor had the 10 British divisions foreseen their destiny.
Will the United States in its defense against the dictatorship of China, with its population exceeding that of the United States more than four times, go the way France did in its defense against the dictatorship of Germany?
General Chi Haotian: 2005 speech
War is Coming to Us
Comrades:
I feel very heavy when writing this topic, because China's modernization process has been repeatedly interrupted by attacks and direct aggression from external forces. The most typical example is the so-called "golden decade" from 1927 to 1937. The so-called golden decade is not golden at all from a modern perspective. In the meantime, there was the fall of Northeast China on September 18, 1931, and the establishment of the Jidong puppet regime. But relatively speaking, China's economic development speed was relatively fast from 1927 to 1937, infrastructure construction had made considerable progress, and military construction also improved. China had a little hope. But this was intolerable to Japan. After annexing the three northeastern provinces, it was not satisfied and could not wait to launch a full-scale war of aggression against China. China was forced to hold out for 8 years with a scorched earth policy. Although China won a bitter victory, it lost Outer Mongolia, was seriously injured, and had property losses of more than 600 billion US dollars. After 8 years of war, China, which was already poor and weak, became even poorer and blanker. It can be said that Japan's aggression, especially the full-scale war of aggression against China, greatly delayed China's modernization process.
Not allowing China to develop and hindering China's modernization process has always been the unchanging national policy of the great powers, especially Japan. We should have the most painful historical lessons for this. There is cooperation between countries, but the more essential thing is competition, conflict and the extreme form of conflict - war. Cooperation is temporary and conditional, while competition and conflict are absolute and are the main axis of history. Therefore, the so-called saying that peace and development are the themes of the contemporary era is completely wrong (at most it can only be used as a stopgap measure). This saying has no theoretical basis that can withstand scrutiny, and it is not in line with facts and historical experience. Not to mention the geographical and historical enemies such as China and Japan, even the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s is enough to show that any country takes the pursuit of national interests as the only code of conduct, leaving no room for morality. At that time, China and the Soviet Union had a common ideology and faced a common enemy, and China's low level of science and technology made it impossible for China to pose a threat to the Soviet Union, but China and the Soviet Union still split and then moved towards a sharp confrontation. There are many reasons for this, but a fundamental reason is that the Soviet Union did not want to see an increasingly developed and powerful China standing shoulder to shoulder with it, even if there was only such a trend but was far from becoming a reality.
The reason why the statement that peace and development are the themes of our time is a completely wrong, wishful thinking, and a harmful doctrine that has an anesthetic effect is as follows:
It has been a consistent national policy of the major powers to attack China's modernization process.
From the experience and lessons of modern Chinese history, and the experience and lessons of the People's Republic of China over the past 50 years, we can draw the following historical law: It has been the consistent national policy of the great powers to attack (including through total war) China's modernization process. This has been the case for the past 160 years, and will remain the case for the next 160 years.
Second, development means danger and threat. Without the "right to war", there is no right to development.
Development means danger and threat, which is a general rule in world history. Only in Chinese history is there an exception, such as the Han Dynasty, which was able to develop "behind closed doors" after defeating all opponents within the geographical limits of the time, and then gave rise to "universalism". Because no matter from the perspective of population, military, economy, or culture, no ethnic group can compare with the Han people, and no ethnic group can even be seen to have the potential to do so.
In the Warring States Period, the development of one country meant a threat to another country. This was a general rule in world history and the core and cornerstone of Western diplomacy. The founder of Western diplomacy was French Cardinal Richelieu. He was the first to step out of the "ignorance" of the Middle Ages in the diplomatic field and pioneered modern diplomacy, abandoning any moral and religious constraints and revolving around national interests. The foreign policy he formulated benefited France for more than 200 years and dominated Europe, while the 30-year war he planned caused great suffering to Germany, splitting it into small states and forever in turmoil until Bismarck unified Germany. The process of German unification shows that without Bismarck's "right to war", there would be no national unification, let alone the right to development.
3. Modernization under the saber, China's only choice
The China Threat theory is completely correct, which is a typical Western way of thinking. "I develop my own economy behind closed doors, who am I offending?" This Chinese way of thinking is not only stupid, but also cannot be "in line with international standards". In the Warring States period, in the cruel field of national interests, there was no room for any tenderness. Whoever wanted to hold the slightest fantasy would be cruelly punished by history. China's development is of course a threat to Japan and other countries. China itself may not think so, but it is almost impossible for China to change the deep-rooted thinking of Japan and other powers that has been "in line with international standards". Therefore, our thinking basis should and must be: China's development is a threat to Japan and other countries.
According to the "rationality", every country and nation has the right to survive and develop. For example, as China's economy develops, it must import oil. In order to protect the ecology, China closes mountains to grow forests, and must import raw materials such as wood. This is the most natural and "reasonable" thing. However, the great powers have their own "reason". If a big country like China purchases 100 million tons of oil in 2010 and 200 million tons in 2020, will the great powers tolerate it?
The struggle for basic survival resources (including land and ocean) is the root cause of most wars in history. There will be changes in this information age, but there will be no fundamental changes. Isn't it that a developed, advanced and civilized country like Israel has been fighting with Arab and Palestinian countries for 50 years for a large place (including fighting for water sources) and is still fighting all the time? In order to fight for the most legitimate right to development (unless the Chinese are always content with poverty and give up even the right to development), China must prepare for war. This is not determined by us, nor by the good wishes of some kind-hearted people among us. In fact, it is determined by "international practice" and the great powers.
China's 20-year policy of peace and development has come to an end. The international environment has undergone a qualitative change. That is, the great powers are ready to interrupt China's modernization process again. If China wants to develop and safeguard its right to development, it must prepare for war. Only by preparing for war can it win space and time for development.
The peaceful and pastoral development of the past 20 years has come to an end. The next show to be staged is and can only be: modernization under the sword.
4. (Big) Diplomacy determines domestic affairs.
Even the most hawkish hawks in China do not necessarily advocate going to war now, although we have sufficient reasons, such as the war of national reunification and the purpose of safeguarding the rights and interests in the South China Sea. It is for the right to development and cherish the rare and extremely precious right to development in China in the past 160 years. However, when this right to development is increasingly threatened, it is time for us to take up arms and defend the right to development of the Chinese people.
It is true that domestic affairs determine foreign affairs, but don't forget that in this Warring States period, (big) diplomacy also determined domestic affairs. This is not only a theoretical statement, but also a statement based on the historical experience of the People's Republic of China. In the 1970s, China's defense expenditure exceeded the sum of science, education, culture, and health expenditures (so people lived in poverty). I certainly don't want China's military spending to exceed the sum of its spending on science, education, culture, and health. In fact, what China needs to invest in most is education. But will the great powers allow this? Don't they want to invest more money in science, education, culture, and health?
Some people say that based on the so-called declassified Soviet documents, it is proved that the Soviet Union did not have a plan to fully invade China in the 1960s and 1970s. Even if these declassified documents are correct, they cannot explain the "truth of history". The chess game is interactive. China, under the leadership of Mao Zedong, had not made the most adequate spiritual and material preparations, which greatly increased the risks and costs of the Soviet Union's full-scale invasion of China. History also turned completely in another direction. The weak will only attract aggression. From this perspective, they are the true defenders of peace.
5. Seeking good and getting evil, can China have peace in the next 10 years?
To interrupt China's modernization process and deprive the Chinese people of their right to development, the great powers have many cards to play, the most obvious three cards are the "three islands", among which the Taiwan card is the most effective. When the Taiwan Strait War breaks out, the decision-making power is neither in our hands nor in the hands of the Taiwan separatists, but in the hands of the United States and Japan. If the Taiwan Strait War breaks out, it will not only be a war of unification, but also a deeper determination by the United States and Japan to deprive the Chinese people of their right to development and once again interrupt China's modernization process, just like the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 in history, when Japan invaded China in an all-round way, not only to cede territory and pay compensation, but more fundamentally, Japan interrupted China's modernization process and deprived the Chinese people of their civil rights.
Therefore, we must view the war in the Taiwan Strait from the perspective of a strategic decisive battle. However, with our current military strength, it is not a strategic decisive battle for the United States and Japan, especially for the United States, because China has only a few intercontinental missiles, and the United States is determined to develop NMD.
To prevent and delay the outbreak of a war in the Taiwan Strait, we must first raise the war in the Taiwan Strait to the level of a "symmetrical strategic decisive battle", a procedure of life and death. If we cannot win the war in the Taiwan Strait, the consequences will be worse than the defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War. Therefore, if we do not fight, then Japan will be completely destroyed and the United States will be crippled. Only nuclear war can do this.
Seeking good will only bring you evil, this is the final outcome of our current policy, seeking evil will only bring you good, only by having the ability to completely destroy Japan and cripple the United States can we win peace, otherwise the Taiwan issue will not last more than 10 years, and there will be a war within 10 years!
6. Hegemony is the essential characteristic of the existence of a great power
. What is a great power? Hegemony is a great power, and without hegemony, it is a puppet at the mercy of others, and its fate (including the right to development) is controlled by others. Hegemony is an objective existence in this Warring States period, "it is not subject to human will", the question is whether you realize it, whether you actively pursue it, or passively approach it. All China's problems, including the three islands issue, the development of strategic industries, and the adjustment of interests of various classes in the country are ultimately issues of competing for hegemony for the Chinese nation.
If you want to fight for hegemony, you can't fight internally. You need internal stability and unity. Britain realized the "aristocratization of the working class" early due to the huge benefits of overseas colonization. The huge compensation and market that Japan extracted from China not only benefited the upper class, but also brought huge benefits to the lower class of Japan. The times are different, and the national conditions are different, but the essence has not changed. We should not only look at military and diplomatic issues from the perspective of hegemony, but also look at the adjustment of internal classes and class interests from the perspective of hegemony. The upper elite class that only oppresses and exploits the lower classes of their own country cannot represent the interests of the nation in this Warring States period. They are decadent, decadent, and have no future. They should be restricted and eliminated. Only mature and wise upper classes can represent the interests of the nation, that is, implement a "concession policy" internally and lead the lower classes to jointly obtain overseas interests. (This issue is more complicated and will be discussed in detail later. China has huge overseas interests, but we have not yet actively developed them.)
War is not far from us. It is the midwife of the Chinese century.
Comrades,
I am very excited today because the large-scale online questionnaire survey we commissioned Sina.com shows that there is great hope for our next generation and that our party's cause will be carried on. In answering the question "Will you shoot women, children and prisoners of war?", more than 80% of people answered in the affirmative, which greatly exceeded our expectations.
Today I want to focus on why we entrusted Sina.com to conduct this survey of our people. My talk today is a sequel to my last speech, in which I started with the issue of the three islands, mentioned that the past 20 years of idyllic "peace and development" have come to an end, and modernization under the sword is China's only choice for the next step, and also mentioned that we have huge overseas interests. Today I will give some specific explanations on these two points.
Although the core question of our survey is whether to shoot women, children and prisoners of war, its significance is not limited to this. At first glance, our main intention is to explore the Chinese people's attitude towards war: if these future soldiers dare to kill non-combatants, they will naturally kill combatants a hundred times more, so the answers to the questionnaire can reflect the people's overall attitude towards war.
But in fact, our real intention is not just this. The purpose of the central government's decision to conduct this survey is to conduct a thorough investigation. We want to know whether our people can accept the fact that if China's global development is accompanied by the mass death of the population of hostile countries, and whether our people support or oppose it.
As we all know, the core idea of Comrade Xiaoping is "development is the hard truth". Comrade Jintao also always emphasizes that "development is the top priority" and we must hold on to it tightly. But comrades often understand it one-sidedly, thinking that it is limited to our domestic development. In fact, our "development" refers to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. This rejuvenation will certainly not be limited to our current land, but will certainly expand to the whole world.
Why do I say so?
Comrade Liu Huaqing, the leader of the older generation of our party, and Comrade He Xin, a young strategist of our party, have repeatedly emphasized the theory of the shift of the center of world civilization. Our slogan of rejuvenation of China is based on this idea. You can look through our newspapers and periodicals over the years, and check online to see who in our party first proposed the slogan of national rejuvenation. It was Comrade He Xin who first proposed it. Do you know this person, He Xin? Although he rolls up his sleeves and trouser legs when giving a report, and looks like he is fighting with others, which is annoying, his historical perspective is a valuable asset of our party.
Let’s start from the beginning.
As we all know, according to the viewpoints propagated by Western scholars, all human beings on the earth originated from the same mother in Africa, so it does not matter which ethnic group has racial superiority. However, according to the research of most of our Chinese scholars, we Chinese are different from other races on the earth. We did not originate in Africa, but independently originated in the current Chinese land. The familiar Zhoukoudian Chinese ape-man is a development stage of our ancestors. The "Chinese Civilization Origin Exploration Project" currently underway in our country is to strive to fully explore the origin, process and development of ancient Chinese civilization. In the past, it has always been said that "Chinese civilization has a history of 5,000 years." Now, many of our experts engaged in archaeological, ethnic and regional cultural history research believe that the new discoveries of the Hongshan Culture in Northeast China, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang, the Jinsha Site in Sichuan, and the Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Yongzhou, Hunan have further clarified the survival status of China's early civilization, proving that the history of China's rice farming culture alone can be pushed back to 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, thus breaking the "5,000-year-old Chinese civilization" theory. So we can say that we are "a cultural root system of more than one million years, a civilization progress of tens of thousands of years, an ancient country of 5,000 years, and a Chinese entity of 2,000 years." This is the Chinese nation that we are proud of and call ourselves "descendants of Yan and Huang". If Hitler's Germany advocated that the Germanic people were the most superior people on earth, then our nation is much more superior than them.
Precisely because of our long history, our nation has long spread to the Americas and the Pacific Rim, and these are the American Indians and the East Asians in various regions of the South Pacific.
As we all know, due to our national superiority, during the heyday of the Tang Dynasty, our civilization was at the top of the world. No other civilization in the world could stand shoulder to shoulder with us. We were the center of world civilization. It was only because of our later self-isolation and isolation that Western civilization surpassed us and the center of world civilization shifted to the West.
When looking back on this history, everyone will naturally be concerned about whether the center of world civilization will return to China?
In his report to the Central Committee in 1988, Comrade He Xin proposed that if the world's leading center has been located in Europe in the West since the 18th century and has shifted to the United States since the middle of the 20th century, then in the 21st century, the world's leading center will shift to the East of the earth. This "East" is of course mainly China.
Comrade Liu Huaqing actually proposed a similar idea as early as the mid-1980s. He pointed out from historical analysis that the center of world civilization is shifting, from the East to Western Europe, then to the United States, and now it is shifting back to the East. So, if the 19th century was the century of Britain and the 20th century was the century of the United States, then the 21st century is the century of China.
Consciously recognizing this historical law and welcoming the arrival of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As you all know, at the end of the last century, we built a Chinese Millennium Monument in Beijing. At the moment when the new century arrived, the leadership of the Party Central Committee held a rally to welcome the Chinese Century by holding the Zhoukoudian Torch high there. This was to follow the historical law and make the realization of the Chinese Century the goal of our Party. Later, we wrote the great goal of national rejuvenation into the political report of the 16th National Congress, and also clearly stipulated in the new Party Constitution that our Party is the vanguard of the Chinese nation. These are all major developments in Marxism and reflect the courage of our Party. As you all know, in the past, Marx and his people never said that the Communist Party was the vanguard of any nation, nor did they say that national rejuvenation could be the slogan of the Communist Party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong, a courageous national hero, only dared to raise the banner of "world proletarian revolution" and did not dare to shout the slogan of national rejuvenation the loudest.
We must hold high the banner of national rejuvenation and welcome the arrival of the Chinese Century. How can we strive to realize the Chinese Century? We must learn from the valuable experience of human history, master all the outstanding achievements of human civilization, and learn from the lessons of other nations.
This lesson is the lesson of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe losing power and the party's collapse and the lesson of the defeat of Germany and Japan. There has been a lot of discussion about the lesson of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe losing power and the party's collapse recently, so I won't talk about it here. Today I will only talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan.
As we all know, Hitler's Germany also attached great importance to the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi Party and the government specially set up a number of propaganda and education institutions, such as the "National Propaganda Guidance Office", "National Education and Propaganda Department", "World View Learning and Education Supervision Office", and "Press Office". From primary school to university, they instilled in the people of the country that the Germans were the most outstanding nation. They wanted the people to believe that their historical mission as Aryans was to become the "king of the earth" who "dominated the world". The unity of the Germans at that time was much stronger than ours now.
But in the end, Germany was defeated miserably, and Japan along with it was also defeated miserably. What was the reason? We also summarized the experience of Germany and Japan's rapid development when we studied the laws of the rise and fall of great powers at the Politburo meeting. While we are determined to follow the German path to revive China, we must never repeat the mistakes they made.
The specific reasons are as follows. First, they made too many enemies at once and did not grasp the principle of defeating them one by one. Second, they were eager for success and lacked the patience and endurance to achieve great things. Third, they were not ruthless when they should have been, which left behind troubles. Imagine if Germany and Japan could have remained neutral to the United States and fought a protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this policy and bought time to get nuclear weapons and missiles through the test, and then suddenly used nuclear weapons and missiles to attack the United States and the Soviet Union, the United States and the Soviet Union would have been unable to resist and surrendered. Especially the little Japan, which made a huge mistake and launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. That small attack did not hit the vital point of the United States, but dragged it into the war and joined the ranks of digging graves for the German, Japanese and fascists. Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won, history would have been rewritten. In that case, I am afraid that there would be no one like us controlling China, but Japan would move its capital to China and control China. Then, it might be Japan controlling China and the entire Asia, exerting the oriental wisdom, defeating the western wisdom of the Germans and unifying the world. This is all nonsense, I won’t talk about it anymore…
Fundamentally speaking, the reason why Germany and Japan suffered a disastrous defeat was that history did not arrange for them to be the "Kings of the Earth", because in fact they were the most outstanding nations.
Of course, on the surface, the history of China today is surprisingly similar to that of Germany back then. They both believe that their race is the most superior, they both have a history of being bullied by the powers and have a revenge mentality, they both have a tradition of worshipping their own authority, they both feel that their living space is seriously insufficient, they both hold high the banners of nationalism and socialism and call themselves "national socialism", they both worship "one country, one party, one leader, one doctrine",...
But if we really compare Germany with China, to use Comrade Jiang Zemin's words, it is simply child's play! How many people, how big is Germany, and how long is its history? We wiped out the Kuomintang's 8 million troops in three years, and how many opponents did they kill in Germany? Their false fire was extinguished after more than ten years, while we have been doing it for more than 80 years and are still full of vitality. We proposed the theory of the transfer of the center of civilization, which is of course much more profound than Hitler's theory of "king of the earth". The breadth and depth of our civilization determines that we are much more sophisticated than them.
The reason why we Chinese are better than the Germans is that our nation is superior to them. Therefore, we have a long history, a large population and a wide territory. On this basis, our ancestors left us two most fundamental heirlooms, which are atheism and great unity. Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, is the founder.
These two magic weapons determine that we have stronger vitality than the West, so the Chinese nation is enduring. No matter how serious the natural disasters, man-made disasters and national disasters are, we are destined to "not die in the sky and not be buried in the earth". This is our advantage. Take the war situation in response to emergencies as an example. The reason why the United States has not been destroyed so far is that the war has not officially hit its homeland. Once the enemy targets its homeland, by the time its Congress has finished debating and authorized the president to declare war, the enemy would have already hit Washington. And what about us? There is no such wrangling. Comrade Xiaoping said, "The leadership of the Party decides on issues quickly, and once it is decided, it will be implemented. There is no wrangling like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage." The democratic centralism of our party is based on the tradition of great unity. Although German fascism also emphasizes a high degree of centralization, it only focuses on the personal power of the head of state, but ignores the collective leadership of the central team. Therefore, Hitler was later deserted by his friends and relatives, which fundamentally shook the Nazi Party's war capabilities.
We are different from Germany because we are completely atheist, while Germany was originally a Catholic and Christian country, and Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that the intelligence of ordinary people was low and that the leaders should have the final say, and although the German people at that time also worshipped Hitler very much, Germany did not have a long-standing tradition of worshipping "saints" like China. The reason why our Chinese society has always worshipped "saints" is because we do not worship any gods. If you worship gods, you cannot worship people, unless you recognize who is the representative of God, just like some countries in the Middle East. And once you recognize who is a saint, of course you will be led by him, rather than you supervising and selecting him. This is the basis of our democratic centralism.
Therefore, in the final analysis, only China, not Germany, is a reliable force against Western parliamentary democracy. The emergence of Hitler's dictatorship in Germany may have been just a momentary historical misunderstanding.
At this point, you may understand why we recently issued a decision to further promote atheism. If we allow Western theism to come to China and hollow us out, if we allow the Chinese people to listen to God and follow God, who will be able to listen to us and follow us? If the people do not believe that Comrade Jintao is a qualified leader and question him and want to supervise him, if the believers in our church question why we go to the church to lead God, can our party still lead China? !
Germany's efforts to become the "King of the Earth" failed. The reason is that history did not give them this historical mission. However, Germany's three experiences are what we should learn when fulfilling our historical mission and realizing national rejuvenation. That is, we must firmly grasp the issue of national living space, firmly grasp the leadership of the ruling party, and firmly grasp the general direction of being the "King of the Earth". We must hold on to these three issues.
I will now discuss these three issues.
First, we should focus on the living space issue, which is the biggest focus of our national rejuvenation. In my last speech, I mentioned that the struggle for basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the root cause of most wars in history. In this information age, there will be changes, but there will be no fundamental changes. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany in the past. Coupled with the deteriorating effects of economic development and the rapid deterioration of the climate in the past two decades, our resources are seriously depleted and the environment is seriously deteriorating, especially the land, water and air problems, which are particularly serious. Our sustainable development and even the survival of the nation are facing serious threats, which are far more serious than those of Germany in the past. Anyone who has been to Western countries can feel that their living space is far greater than ours. There are large forests beside their highways, while we rarely see a few trees beside our roads; their sky is often blue and white clouds, while our sky is covered with a black pot lid; their tap water can be drunk by turning it on, while our groundwater is polluted and cannot be drunk without filtering; there are few people on their streets, and two or three people live in a small building, while our streets are crowded with people, and several people squeeze into one room. Many years ago, someone wrote a book titled "Yellow Peril", saying that when my country's population reaches 1.3 billion, because everyone is targeting the high consumption of the American lifestyle, the limited land resources cannot bear it, and the society will collapse. Now our population has exceeded this limit and relies on imported resources to maintain. It's not that we don't pay attention to this issue. We have a Ministry of Land and Resources that focuses on this issue every day. However, because the term "living space" has too many connections with Nazi Germany, it is inconvenient for us to talk about it publicly to avoid the West thinking of Nazi Germany and fueling the "China threat theory". Therefore, when we emphasize that "human rights are the right to survive" in accordance with He Xin's theory, we deliberately only talk about "survival" instead of "space" and avoid using the term "living space". Historically speaking, the reason why China faces the problem of living space is that Western countries developed ahead of Eastern countries, so they were able to colonize the world and thus occupy a favorable position in the issue of living space. If we want to solve this problem, we must lead our people to go out and develop abroad.
The second issue is that we must focus on the leadership ability of the ruling party. We have grasped this issue better than their National Socialist Party (i.e., the Nazi Party). Although they extended the power of the Nazi Party to all aspects of the German state power, they did not emphasize the absolute leadership of the party like we did, and did not make "the party must manage itself" the first priority like we did. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the "three magic weapons" of our party to conquer the world, he regarded the construction of our Communist Party and the leadership of the Communist Party as the most important magic weapon.
If we want to consolidate our party's leadership position and strengthen its leadership capabilities, the key is to grasp two things.
One is to promote the Three Represents theory and emphasize that our party is the vanguard of the Chinese nation and not just the vanguard of the proletariat. Many people were discussing, "We have never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can you call yourselves our 'representatives'?"
Don't worry about this. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if you lead your allies to victory and benefit them, they will support you. Therefore, as long as we lead the Chinese people to go out and solve the problem of China's lack of living space, the Chinese people will support us, and then there will be no need to worry about the labels of "autocracy" and "dictatorship". Therefore, whether we can always represent the Chinese people depends on whether we can successfully lead the people to go out.
Therefore, this second point, whether or not the Communist Party can lead the Chinese people to go global, is the biggest and key issue concerning the Communist Party’s leadership.
Why do I say so?
As you all know, without the leadership of our Party, there would be nothing in China. Therefore, forever safeguarding the leadership of our Party is our highest purpose. Before the June 4th Incident, we vaguely realized that as long as China turned over, we could win the support and love of the people for the Communist Party, so we had to strive for decades of peace to develop China. No matter what doctrine, no matter whether the cat is white or black, as long as it can develop China, it is a good cat! However, at that time, we had not yet maturely considered how to deal with international disputes after China developed. At that time, Comrade Xiaoping proposed that the theme of the contemporary world is peace and development. But the June 4th riot sounded a warning to our Party and taught us the most memorable lesson. The pressure of China's peaceful evolution made us have to reconsider the theme of the times. We see that neither of the two issues of peace and development has been resolved. Western hostile forces always transform the world and China according to their own image, and try to overthrow the leadership of our Communist Party through peaceful evolution. Therefore, if we only engage in construction and development, there is still a possibility that the Communist Party will lose its rule. The June 4th riots almost succeeded in peaceful evolution. If it weren't for the fact that a large number of our old comrades were still alive and took power from Zhao Ziyang's team at a critical moment, we would all have been locked up, and even if we were tortured to death, we would not have the face to report to Marx. But even though the June 4th hurdle has passed, when the last batch of our old comrades have died, without us at the helm, peaceful evolution will still come to China, just like the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they put down the Hungarian incident at that time and repelled the attack of Yugoslavia's Tito revisionism, but they could not withstand Gorbachev more than 30 years later. The reason is that once the old comrades who fought for the world have died, the Communist Party's world will be taken away by peaceful evolution.
After the June 4th riots were suppressed, we have been considering how to prevent China from peacefully evolving in order to preserve the leadership of the Communist Party. We have been thinking about it, but we can't come up with a good solution. If we can't come up with a good solution, China's peaceful evolution will be inevitable, and we will become the sinners of history. After our party's deep reflection, we finally came to the conclusion: Only by transforming the developed national strength into the power of a fist to go out and leading the people to go out, can we always win the support and love of the Chinese people for the Communist Party, and our party can always be invincible. The people will not be able to do without the Communist Party, and will always be willing to follow the Communist Party, just like the couplet that was common in our rural areas before: "Listen to Chairman Mao and follow the Communist Party"!
Therefore, the June 4th riots made us realize that we must closely combine the construction and development of the country with preparing for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then, our national defense policy has made a 180-degree turn. We have increasingly emphasized "combining peace and war (peacetime and wartime)". All our construction and development must be prepared for the needs of war! We still publicly emphasize that we should focus on economic construction, but in fact, economic construction is centered on war! We have spent a lot of effort to build the "Great Wall Project", building a strong underground Great Wall capable of fighting nuclear wars in coastal defense, border defense and large and medium-sized cities throughout China, and storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fight the Third World War, but we must lead the people to go out and ensure the leadership of our party. In any case, our Communist Party of China will not withdraw from the stage of history! We would rather let the whole world and even the whole earth coexist with our party than withdraw from the stage of history!!! Isn't there a "nuclear bundling" theory now? That is to say, nuclear weapons bind the security of the whole world together, and if we die, everyone will die together. I think there is actually another kind of bond, that is, the fate of our party is tied to the fate of the entire world. If our Communist Party is finished, China is finished, and the world is finished.
Our party's historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out. If we look far ahead, we can see that history has come in this way: first, China's long history has created the world's largest mainland population and overseas Chinese population; second, in order to pursue our largest market in the world, Western capitalists who are profit-oriented must come to China to invest funds and technology to support our construction and development when we open our doors; third, the power of so many overseas Chinese has created the best conditions for my country to introduce foreign capital, foreign technology and advanced experience, so that my country's reform and opening up will inevitably achieve great success; fourth, China's economic development is bound to be accompanied by the reduction of China's per capita living space, prompting China to strive for new living space abroad; fifth, China's great development is also bound to be accompanied by the great development of our military power, which has prepared the conditions for us to go to the world and develop overseas. Since Napoleon, the West has had great fears about the awakening of the sleeping lion of China. But the sleeping lion of China standing up and going to the world is unstoppable!
What is the third issue that we should firmly grasp when fulfilling the historical mission of national rejuvenation? That is, we should unswervingly grasp the general direction of "the American issue".
Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we must have a correct political direction. What is our greatest correct direction? It is to solve the American problem.
This may seem surprising, but the reason is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin made a fundamental assertion that made a lot of sense. In his report to the Central Committee, he asserted that China's rejuvenation was in fundamental conflict with the strategic interests of the West, so it was bound to be blocked by Western countries with all their might. Therefore, only by breaking through the blockade of Western countries led by the United States can China develop and go global!
If we want to go out and gain new living space, will the United States agree? First, if the United States resolutely blocks us, we will have a hard time doing anything to Taiwan and other countries! Second, even if we take some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much living space can we increase? It's insignificant! Only countries like the United States, Canada, and Australia have vast lands for us to colonize in large numbers.
Therefore, solving the "American problem" is the key to solving all other problems. First, it makes it possible for us to colonize there in large numbers, and even to establish another China under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. America was originally discovered by us yellow people, but Columbus gave the credit to the white people. We, the descendants of Yan and Huang, have the right to enjoy this land! I heard that the status of residents of yellow descent in the United States is very low. We must liberate them. Second, if the "American problem" is solved, European and Western countries will succumb to us, and Taiwan, Japan and other small countries are even less of a problem. Therefore, solving the "American problem" is the task that history has entrusted to us, the Chinese Communists.
Sometimes I think that China and the United States are really enemies, it's so cruel! Do you remember a movie about Liu and Deng's army called "The Decisive Battle of Central Plains"? There is a famous saying in the movie: "The road of enemies is narrow, and the brave will win!" It was with this desperate fight that we seized the Chinese mainland. History has destined China and the United States to fight each other in a narrow road of enemies! Although historically speaking, the United States did not invade and harm China like Russia and Japan, and helped China fight Japan during the War of Resistance, it will inevitably become an obstacle to our national rejuvenation in the future, and the biggest obstacle! In the long run, the relationship between China and the United States is this kind of narrow road of enemies, a life-and-death relationship.
Once, when the Americans came to visit us, they advised us to recognize that the Sino-US relationship is a mutually dependent one. Comrade Xiaoping politely replied to them: "Tell your government that there is no mutually dependent relationship between China and the United States, where neither can do without the other." In fact, Comrade Xiaoping was too polite and failed to say frankly, "The relationship between China and the United States is a life-and-death struggle."
Of course, we are not at the point of breaking off relations with them yet. Since the reform and opening up, we have relied on their funds and technology, and we cannot do without the United States, so we have tried our best to develop relations with the United States, learn from the United States in all aspects, and use the United States as an example to rebuild our country. How have we survived in international exchanges over the years? Even if we have to put on a smile, even if we have to give up the right cheek after being hit on the left cheek, we have to bite the bullet and endure it to develop relations with the United States.
Do you still remember Wu Xun in the movie "The Biography of Wu Xun"? In order to complete his mission, he endured so many punches and kicks while enduring the pain! The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only if we learn all its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Although we are now learning the tone of Americans and saying "China and the United States are interdependent and share honor and disgrace", we should not forget that our civilization history has repeatedly taught us that there cannot be two tigers in one mountain. We must also never forget that Comrade Xiaoping emphasized "hiding one's strength and biding one's time". Its subtext is actually: for the United States, we must be patient, we must hide our ultimate goal, hide our capabilities, and wait for the opportunity. In this way, we will be clear-headed: why did we not make the national anthem "keep pace with the times" with a peaceful color, did not make the national anthem leave the theme of war, but instead, when revising the constitution this time, it was clearly stipulated for the first time that "March of the Volunteers" is our national anthem. In this way, we will also understand why we always shout "Taiwan issue" instead of "American issue". Everyone knows the truth of "repairing the plank road in the open and crossing Chencang in secret". If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan, then you, as the national elite, should be able to see the overall picture of our cause. In recent years, we have ceded such a large area of northern territory to Russia in accordance with Comrade Xiaoping's deployment. Is our Party Central Committee a fool?
We need to think outside the box when solving the "American problem." In history, when a country defeated or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered country, because the killing efficiency of swords, spears, and even rifles and machine guns was too low, so it was impossible to get only a piece of land without the people on that land. However, if we conquered the United States according to this framework, we would not be able to colonize the United States in large numbers.
Only by using extraordinary means to "clear out" the United States can we lead the Chinese people. This is the only way, not a question of whether we are willing or not. What extraordinary means can be used to "clear out" the United States? Conventional weapons such as airplanes, cannons, missiles, and warships will not work, and highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons will not work either. We will not be so stupid as to really use nuclear weapons to perish with the United States, although we shout that we will do whatever it takes for the Taiwan issue. Only non-destructive weapons of mass destruction can preserve the United States intact. Modern biotechnology has developed by leaps and bounds, and new biological weapons have emerged one after another. Of course, we have not been idle. Over the years, we have raced against time to master this kind of killer mace. We are already capable of achieving the goal of suddenly "clearing out" the United States. When Comrade Xiaoping was still alive, the Central Committee made a far-sighted and correct decision: not to develop aircraft carrier battle groups, but to concentrate on developing killer maces to exterminate the enemy's population.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should first warn the American people and persuade them to leave America and give the land they live on to the Chinese people, or at least give half of America to Chinese colonization, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But will this work? If it doesn't work, there is only one way to go: use decisive means to "clear the field" in the United States and vacate the land of the United States at lightning speed! Our historical experience has proved that as long as we create a fait accompli, no one in the world can do anything to us, not to mention that the enemy headed by the United States has been eliminated, and other enemies have no choice but to bow to us.
Biological weapons are extremely cruel. But if Americans don't die, then Chinese will die. If the Chinese people are trapped and die on this existing land and a great social collapse occurs, according to the calculations of the author of "Yellow Peril", more than half of the Chinese people will die, more than 800 million people! Our yellow land carried nearly 500 million people at the beginning of liberation, and now the public population exceeds 1.3 billion. The carrying capacity of this yellow land has reached its limit. One day, it may collapse and more than half of the population will die.
We must be prepared for both situations. If the biological weapons attack succeeds, the Chinese people will pay the minimum sacrifice in the struggle against the United States. But if it fails or triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China may suffer a disaster of losing more than half of its population, so we must make good preparations for air defense in large and medium-sized cities. But no matter what, for the future of the party, the country and the nation, we can only move forward boldly! No matter how many difficulties and obstacles there are, no matter how much sacrifice we have to make! Even if more than half of the population dies, they can still regenerate, but once the Communist Party collapses, everything will be over! Forever!
In the past, when dynasties changed in China, the cruel ones won and the kind ones lost. The most typical example was that the overlord was kind and failed to "pursue the enemy" against Liu Bang, but ended up dying in front of Liu Bang. So we emphasize that we must take decisive measures. In the future, when China and the United States meet on a narrow road, if we are soft-hearted, it would be cruel to the Chinese people.
At this point, some people will inevitably ask: What about our millions of compatriots in the United States? They say, aren't we against Chinese killing Chinese?
These comrades are very pedantic and too unrealistic. If we insist that Chinese people do not kill Chinese people, can we liberate China? As for the millions of Chinese in the United States, this is of course a big problem, so we have also been researching genetic weapons in recent years, that is, biological weapons that do not kill yellow people. But this research is very difficult. Israel is at the forefront of genetic weapons research in the world. Their genetic weapons are used to deal with Arabs and protect Israelis. But even they have not reached the practical stage. We have research cooperation with Israel, and we can take some of their technology and transform the technology they use to protect Israelis to protect yellow people. But their technology is not up to standard, and it is difficult for us to surpass them within a few years. If genetic weapons can only be broken through in five to ten years, we can't wait. The limited life of us old comrades can't wait. Although old soldiers like me can wait for another five or ten years, those old comrades of the Type 38 and the few old Red Army soldiers can't wait any longer. So we have to give up our expectations for genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, most of the Chinese in the United States are a burden to us. They are used to the bourgeois liberal ideas and are not easy to accept the leadership of our party. If they survive, we will have to carry out movements to deal with them and transform them. We should not forget that when we overthrew the Kuomintang and liberated mainland China, so many bourgeois and intellectuals supported us with both hands, but later we still had to carry out "suppression of counter-revolutionaries" and "anti-rightist movement" to clean up and transform them again? Some people hid very deeply and were not dug out until the Cultural Revolution.
History has proved that any major social change will cause a large number of deaths if it is not done well. Can we say that death is the driving force for the advancement of history? How many people died in the Three Kingdoms? How many people died when Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia? How many people died when the Qing Dynasty entered the Pass? Not many people died in the Xinhai Revolution, but we overthrew the three mountains and "suppressed counter-revolutionaries", "three antis" and "five antis", and at least 20 million people died. ... We were worried that some young people would be scared when they heard about the death of people in the war. We have seen many deaths during the war, blood and flesh flying everywhere, liver and brains smeared on the ground, corpses everywhere, and blood flowing like rivers. We have seen many. On the battlefield, everyone killed people with bloodshot eyes, because it was a life-and-death struggle, and the brave would win. It is indeed cruel to ask the Americans to die 100 or 200 million people, but only this way can we exchange for the Chinese century, the century in which the Chinese Communist Party leads the world. We don't want people to die, we are revolutionary humanitarians. But if history forces us to choose: Chinese or American deaths? Is it more important to save the lives of hundreds of millions of Chinese or to save the life of our party? We can only choose the latter. Who told us to be Chinese? Who told us to be members of the Communist Party? From the first day we joined the party, the life of the party was above everything else! History will prove that our choice is correct.
Now, after I have finished talking about this, you probably understand why we are conducting this online survey. In short, our online survey is to understand if one day we secretly use decisive means to "clean up" the United States, will it provoke resistance from our people? Are the people more supportive or more opposed? Our basic judgment is that if the people agree to shoot prisoners of war and women and children, then they will agree to "clean up" the United States. For more than 20 years, China has basically been in a peaceful era, and a whole generation has not been baptized by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, the form of war, war concepts and war ethics in the world have changed greatly. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European communist countries, Western ideology has dominated the world, and Western human nature and human rights concepts have increasingly penetrated Chinese youth. Therefore, we were not very sure about the attitude of the people. If our people are basically opposed to our "cleaning up" in the United States, we certainly need to have corresponding countermeasures.
Why did we conduct the survey online instead of through administrative channels? Of course there is a reason.
First, reducing human interference will help us understand the real thoughts of the people. In addition, it will not leak secrets and will not expose the real purpose of our investigation. The most important thing is that those who can participate in answering questions online are mainly groups with a certain cultural background and a certain level of intelligence. They are the backbone group and leaders who play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, the entire people will follow us; if they oppose us, they will play a dangerous role in the entire society, calling for a high call and rising up.
We are very pleased that they did not hand in a blank paper, but instead, they handed in an excellent score of more than 80 points. This is an outstanding achievement of our party's propaganda and education over the past decades.
Of course, there are a very small number of people who are influenced by the West and oppose shooting prisoners of war, women and children. Some of them said: "Seeing so many people say that they want to kill women and children, I am really scared. Are you all crazy?" Some said: "The Chinese claim to love peace, but in fact they are the most cruel nation. The comments are full of killing voices, which is chilling."
Although the number of people holding such views is too small to have an impact on the overall situation, we still need to intensify our propaganda efforts against such arguments.
This is to vigorously publicize Comrade He Xin's latest conclusion. His latest conclusion has long been reported to the Central Committee, and you can also find it online.
If you search online with keywords, you can see that Comrade He Xin pointed out in a conversation with Hong Kong Commercial Daily some time ago that "the United States has a shocking conspiracy." According to his information, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States, invited 500 of the world's most important politicians, economic leaders and scientists, including George Bush (who was not the president of the United States at the time), Mrs. Thatcher, Blair, Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist Naisbitt and other global hot figures, to hold a high-level roundtable meeting at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco to discuss globalization and how to guide mankind into the 21st century. According to He Xin, the global elites who attended the meeting believed that in the 21st century, only 20% of the world's population would be enough to maintain the prosperity of the world economy, and the remaining 80% or 4/5 of the world's population were human waste that could not create new value. The participants believed that this extra 80% of the population was garbage and should be gradually eliminated by "high-tech" means.
Therefore, since the enemy is secretly planning to exterminate our population, we certainly cannot be merciful to them. Comrade He Xin's report is very timely, proving the correctness of our tit-for-tat struggle and the wisdom and correctness of Comrade Xiaoping's far-sighted deployment of the strategy against the United States.
Of course, when we publicize Comrade He Xin’s speech, we cannot publish it in the party newspaper so as not to alert the enemy, because He Xin’s speech may make the enemy think that the modern science and technology we have mastered, including "clean" nuclear technology, genetic weapons technology and biological weapons technology, can provide powerful means for large-scale extermination of their population.
The last question I want to talk about is how to firmly grasp the preparations for military struggle.
We are currently at a crossroads between advancing and retreating. Some comrades have seen the rampant corruption, state-owned enterprise problems, bank bad debt problems, environmental problems, social security problems, education problems, AIDS problems, petition problems, and even riots in our country, and have wavered in their determination to prepare for military struggle. They believe that we should first tackle political reform, that our own political reform is the first priority, and that after solving domestic problems, we can then tackle external military struggle.
This reminds me of the critical period of the Chinese Revolution in 1948. At that time, the People's Liberation Army was drinking water from the Yangtze River, but the liberated areas were facing a very complicated situation. Problems that were difficult to solve occurred everywhere, and the central government received urgent warnings every day. What should we do? Should we stop and rectify the rear and internal affairs before moving forward, or should we fight across the Yangtze River in one go? Chairman Mao, with his extraordinary wisdom and courage, issued the marching order to "carry the revolution through to the end" and liberated the whole of China. It turned out that those contradictions and problems that seemed "incredible" at first were all resolved in the surging waves of the revolution.
Now we seem to be at the critical moment when the revolutionary army drank water from the Yangtze River. As long as we firmly grasp the most fundamental point of military struggle preparation, the central government believes that as long as we solve the US problem in one fell swoop, all our domestic problems will be solved. Therefore, our military struggle preparation is ostensibly aimed at Taiwan, but in fact it is aimed at the United States, far exceeding the scope of attacking aircraft carriers and satellites.
Marxism points out that violence is the midwife of the birth of a new society. So war is the midwife of the birth of the Chinese century. As war approaches us, I am full of hope for our next generation.
...........................................................................................................................
Obama proclaimed himself since "America's first Pacific president." and invites China's president Xi to US shores which many see as a mistake.
I drew the following conclusion: We can well assume that the only way for the dictators of China to preserve their dictatorship is to conquer the world and thus eliminate those countries whose freedom seduces so many Chinese.
That became a theme of my columns, and I was especially interested in the public speeches of General Chi Haotian, China’s minister of national defense from 1993 to 2003.
He now is 80 years of age, but he still is a top official. In his public speeches, he described China’s global strategy. Between one-third and two-thirds of the population of the United States is to be annihilated (biologically) and their homes and other property are to be transferred to the new Chinese settlers.
One-third of Americans will be left alive to serve this “superior” race. Due to such conquests, China will become a global empire.
Initially, General Chi’s predictions were ignored by many “American experts” and passed off for forgeries and what not. Those experts did not seem to understand that if the rulers of China had regarded Chi’s speeches harmful, not useful, to them, they would have made Chi lie to the West that those speeches of his are criminal forgeries and that he, General Chi Haotian, has nothing to do with them.
Even if we accept the totally improbable version that he refused to obey the rulers of China (and had been properly tortured to death, using the Chinese experience in torture of thousands or millions of years), the rulers of China would have found another way of lying to the West that so-called “Chi’s speeches” were forgeries.
Anyway, recently I have noticed that General Chi’s predictions, which I have quoted in my columns, are being taken seriously by American readers of my weekly columns (while President Obama had declared the dictatorship of China and the United States, as represented by himself, to be “partners” in the 21st century).
Chris Reynolds of Dallas, Texas, begins his almost page-long e-mail to me on Sept. 4, 2009: “Please continue writing your outstanding columns about China and other threats facing the United States. You have a rare talent for writing about complex issues in very clear terms, without hyperbole, so that even the most ignorant or stubborn people should be able to comprehend your writing without misunderstanding.”
The day earlier, Sept. 3, an e-mail to me said: “Keep up the good work,” and the next day, in his page-long e-mail of Sept. 4, David Fellows had this to say: “First of all, let me say that every chance I get I read and enjoy your articles. I thank you for what you do to inform my fellow Americans, many of whom are living in an intellectual fog.
“Unfortunately, the ones who are most in need of your insight are too busy ‘drinking the Kool-aid’ as we sometimes say in our country.”
My column of Sept. 17, 2009, produced a string of e-mails. On Sept.18, Bret Simms wrote: Hello, great article! My only question is why are so many Americans asleep into thinking one day we will not be attacked.
“My opinion is that the U.S government is in some ways provoking an attack which will neutralize the U.S.A. An attack that could take place in mere yrs . . . . I am born and raised U.S. citizen and love my country. The people of THE UNITED STATES I fear are in for a rude awakening. Again great article . . . keep speaking truth!”
The following day, Gregory Camp begins his e-mail, “Dear Mr. Navrozov, I just ‘discovered’ your work and am forwarding your articles to my friends and colleagues. Thank you for bringing this information to the public.”
On Sept. 17, the day the column appeared, I received an e-mail from Darryl Hicks, executive administrator of mybestyears.com: “Chilling! You’ve just put together the most striking column we’ve read.” And then he ends, “We would certainly enjoy putting the spotlight on you and this invaluable column about the Chinese official [General Chi Haotian].”
What’s the conclusion? It seems to me that mentally alert Americans who value the United States for its freedom and all that freedom brings with it, including personal safety from political persecution, and not only for advertised goods and services at the lowest possible prices, are ready to understand that the United States is a country that is being threatened by a war of annihilation, to be accompanied or followed by similar wars of China on all the other free countries less capable of defending themselves.
What is necessary is to make the danger signal reach millions and dozens of millions of Americans as it has reached those whose e-mails I just quoted above.
Several months ago I suggested production of a film on the subject. The donations to our not-for-profit Center for the Survival of Western Democracies, Inc., are tax-deductible.
Alas, I am too busy, writing, to go into the money jungle, so that the center has no money to create a highly professional and successful film explaining the geostrategic situation of today.
France, together with 10 British divisions in France, was overrun by Nazi troops within six weeks. The French culture, with its intellectual sophistication, education, and Napoleon in its military history, did not help to defend the country from the Nazi invasion. Nor had the 10 British divisions foreseen their destiny.
Will the United States in its defense against the dictatorship of China, with its population exceeding that of the United States more than four times, go the way France did in its defense against the dictatorship of Germany?
General Chi Haotian: 2005 speech
War is Coming to Us
Comrades:
I feel very heavy when writing this topic, because China's modernization process has been repeatedly interrupted by attacks and direct aggression from external forces. The most typical example is the so-called "golden decade" from 1927 to 1937. The so-called golden decade is not golden at all from a modern perspective. In the meantime, there was the fall of Northeast China on September 18, 1931, and the establishment of the Jidong puppet regime. But relatively speaking, China's economic development speed was relatively fast from 1927 to 1937, infrastructure construction had made considerable progress, and military construction also improved. China had a little hope. But this was intolerable to Japan. After annexing the three northeastern provinces, it was not satisfied and could not wait to launch a full-scale war of aggression against China. China was forced to hold out for 8 years with a scorched earth policy. Although China won a bitter victory, it lost Outer Mongolia, was seriously injured, and had property losses of more than 600 billion US dollars. After 8 years of war, China, which was already poor and weak, became even poorer and blanker. It can be said that Japan's aggression, especially the full-scale war of aggression against China, greatly delayed China's modernization process.
Not allowing China to develop and hindering China's modernization process has always been the unchanging national policy of the great powers, especially Japan. We should have the most painful historical lessons for this. There is cooperation between countries, but the more essential thing is competition, conflict and the extreme form of conflict - war. Cooperation is temporary and conditional, while competition and conflict are absolute and are the main axis of history. Therefore, the so-called saying that peace and development are the themes of the contemporary era is completely wrong (at most it can only be used as a stopgap measure). This saying has no theoretical basis that can withstand scrutiny, and it is not in line with facts and historical experience. Not to mention the geographical and historical enemies such as China and Japan, even the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s is enough to show that any country takes the pursuit of national interests as the only code of conduct, leaving no room for morality. At that time, China and the Soviet Union had a common ideology and faced a common enemy, and China's low level of science and technology made it impossible for China to pose a threat to the Soviet Union, but China and the Soviet Union still split and then moved towards a sharp confrontation. There are many reasons for this, but a fundamental reason is that the Soviet Union did not want to see an increasingly developed and powerful China standing shoulder to shoulder with it, even if there was only such a trend but was far from becoming a reality.
The reason why the statement that peace and development are the themes of our time is a completely wrong, wishful thinking, and a harmful doctrine that has an anesthetic effect is as follows:
It has been a consistent national policy of the major powers to attack China's modernization process.
From the experience and lessons of modern Chinese history, and the experience and lessons of the People's Republic of China over the past 50 years, we can draw the following historical law: It has been the consistent national policy of the great powers to attack (including through total war) China's modernization process. This has been the case for the past 160 years, and will remain the case for the next 160 years.
Second, development means danger and threat. Without the "right to war", there is no right to development.
Development means danger and threat, which is a general rule in world history. Only in Chinese history is there an exception, such as the Han Dynasty, which was able to develop "behind closed doors" after defeating all opponents within the geographical limits of the time, and then gave rise to "universalism". Because no matter from the perspective of population, military, economy, or culture, no ethnic group can compare with the Han people, and no ethnic group can even be seen to have the potential to do so.
In the Warring States Period, the development of one country meant a threat to another country. This was a general rule in world history and the core and cornerstone of Western diplomacy. The founder of Western diplomacy was French Cardinal Richelieu. He was the first to step out of the "ignorance" of the Middle Ages in the diplomatic field and pioneered modern diplomacy, abandoning any moral and religious constraints and revolving around national interests. The foreign policy he formulated benefited France for more than 200 years and dominated Europe, while the 30-year war he planned caused great suffering to Germany, splitting it into small states and forever in turmoil until Bismarck unified Germany. The process of German unification shows that without Bismarck's "right to war", there would be no national unification, let alone the right to development.
3. Modernization under the saber, China's only choice
The China Threat theory is completely correct, which is a typical Western way of thinking. "I develop my own economy behind closed doors, who am I offending?" This Chinese way of thinking is not only stupid, but also cannot be "in line with international standards". In the Warring States period, in the cruel field of national interests, there was no room for any tenderness. Whoever wanted to hold the slightest fantasy would be cruelly punished by history. China's development is of course a threat to Japan and other countries. China itself may not think so, but it is almost impossible for China to change the deep-rooted thinking of Japan and other powers that has been "in line with international standards". Therefore, our thinking basis should and must be: China's development is a threat to Japan and other countries.
According to the "rationality", every country and nation has the right to survive and develop. For example, as China's economy develops, it must import oil. In order to protect the ecology, China closes mountains to grow forests, and must import raw materials such as wood. This is the most natural and "reasonable" thing. However, the great powers have their own "reason". If a big country like China purchases 100 million tons of oil in 2010 and 200 million tons in 2020, will the great powers tolerate it?
The struggle for basic survival resources (including land and ocean) is the root cause of most wars in history. There will be changes in this information age, but there will be no fundamental changes. Isn't it that a developed, advanced and civilized country like Israel has been fighting with Arab and Palestinian countries for 50 years for a large place (including fighting for water sources) and is still fighting all the time? In order to fight for the most legitimate right to development (unless the Chinese are always content with poverty and give up even the right to development), China must prepare for war. This is not determined by us, nor by the good wishes of some kind-hearted people among us. In fact, it is determined by "international practice" and the great powers.
China's 20-year policy of peace and development has come to an end. The international environment has undergone a qualitative change. That is, the great powers are ready to interrupt China's modernization process again. If China wants to develop and safeguard its right to development, it must prepare for war. Only by preparing for war can it win space and time for development.
The peaceful and pastoral development of the past 20 years has come to an end. The next show to be staged is and can only be: modernization under the sword.
4. (Big) Diplomacy determines domestic affairs.
Even the most hawkish hawks in China do not necessarily advocate going to war now, although we have sufficient reasons, such as the war of national reunification and the purpose of safeguarding the rights and interests in the South China Sea. It is for the right to development and cherish the rare and extremely precious right to development in China in the past 160 years. However, when this right to development is increasingly threatened, it is time for us to take up arms and defend the right to development of the Chinese people.
It is true that domestic affairs determine foreign affairs, but don't forget that in this Warring States period, (big) diplomacy also determined domestic affairs. This is not only a theoretical statement, but also a statement based on the historical experience of the People's Republic of China. In the 1970s, China's defense expenditure exceeded the sum of science, education, culture, and health expenditures (so people lived in poverty). I certainly don't want China's military spending to exceed the sum of its spending on science, education, culture, and health. In fact, what China needs to invest in most is education. But will the great powers allow this? Don't they want to invest more money in science, education, culture, and health?
Some people say that based on the so-called declassified Soviet documents, it is proved that the Soviet Union did not have a plan to fully invade China in the 1960s and 1970s. Even if these declassified documents are correct, they cannot explain the "truth of history". The chess game is interactive. China, under the leadership of Mao Zedong, had not made the most adequate spiritual and material preparations, which greatly increased the risks and costs of the Soviet Union's full-scale invasion of China. History also turned completely in another direction. The weak will only attract aggression. From this perspective, they are the true defenders of peace.
5. Seeking good and getting evil, can China have peace in the next 10 years?
To interrupt China's modernization process and deprive the Chinese people of their right to development, the great powers have many cards to play, the most obvious three cards are the "three islands", among which the Taiwan card is the most effective. When the Taiwan Strait War breaks out, the decision-making power is neither in our hands nor in the hands of the Taiwan separatists, but in the hands of the United States and Japan. If the Taiwan Strait War breaks out, it will not only be a war of unification, but also a deeper determination by the United States and Japan to deprive the Chinese people of their right to development and once again interrupt China's modernization process, just like the Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 in history, when Japan invaded China in an all-round way, not only to cede territory and pay compensation, but more fundamentally, Japan interrupted China's modernization process and deprived the Chinese people of their civil rights.
Therefore, we must view the war in the Taiwan Strait from the perspective of a strategic decisive battle. However, with our current military strength, it is not a strategic decisive battle for the United States and Japan, especially for the United States, because China has only a few intercontinental missiles, and the United States is determined to develop NMD.
To prevent and delay the outbreak of a war in the Taiwan Strait, we must first raise the war in the Taiwan Strait to the level of a "symmetrical strategic decisive battle", a procedure of life and death. If we cannot win the war in the Taiwan Strait, the consequences will be worse than the defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War. Therefore, if we do not fight, then Japan will be completely destroyed and the United States will be crippled. Only nuclear war can do this.
Seeking good will only bring you evil, this is the final outcome of our current policy, seeking evil will only bring you good, only by having the ability to completely destroy Japan and cripple the United States can we win peace, otherwise the Taiwan issue will not last more than 10 years, and there will be a war within 10 years!
6. Hegemony is the essential characteristic of the existence of a great power
. What is a great power? Hegemony is a great power, and without hegemony, it is a puppet at the mercy of others, and its fate (including the right to development) is controlled by others. Hegemony is an objective existence in this Warring States period, "it is not subject to human will", the question is whether you realize it, whether you actively pursue it, or passively approach it. All China's problems, including the three islands issue, the development of strategic industries, and the adjustment of interests of various classes in the country are ultimately issues of competing for hegemony for the Chinese nation.
If you want to fight for hegemony, you can't fight internally. You need internal stability and unity. Britain realized the "aristocratization of the working class" early due to the huge benefits of overseas colonization. The huge compensation and market that Japan extracted from China not only benefited the upper class, but also brought huge benefits to the lower class of Japan. The times are different, and the national conditions are different, but the essence has not changed. We should not only look at military and diplomatic issues from the perspective of hegemony, but also look at the adjustment of internal classes and class interests from the perspective of hegemony. The upper elite class that only oppresses and exploits the lower classes of their own country cannot represent the interests of the nation in this Warring States period. They are decadent, decadent, and have no future. They should be restricted and eliminated. Only mature and wise upper classes can represent the interests of the nation, that is, implement a "concession policy" internally and lead the lower classes to jointly obtain overseas interests. (This issue is more complicated and will be discussed in detail later. China has huge overseas interests, but we have not yet actively developed them.)
War is not far from us. It is the midwife of the Chinese century.
Comrades,
I am very excited today because the large-scale online questionnaire survey we commissioned Sina.com shows that there is great hope for our next generation and that our party's cause will be carried on. In answering the question "Will you shoot women, children and prisoners of war?", more than 80% of people answered in the affirmative, which greatly exceeded our expectations.
Today I want to focus on why we entrusted Sina.com to conduct this survey of our people. My talk today is a sequel to my last speech, in which I started with the issue of the three islands, mentioned that the past 20 years of idyllic "peace and development" have come to an end, and modernization under the sword is China's only choice for the next step, and also mentioned that we have huge overseas interests. Today I will give some specific explanations on these two points.
Although the core question of our survey is whether to shoot women, children and prisoners of war, its significance is not limited to this. At first glance, our main intention is to explore the Chinese people's attitude towards war: if these future soldiers dare to kill non-combatants, they will naturally kill combatants a hundred times more, so the answers to the questionnaire can reflect the people's overall attitude towards war.
But in fact, our real intention is not just this. The purpose of the central government's decision to conduct this survey is to conduct a thorough investigation. We want to know whether our people can accept the fact that if China's global development is accompanied by the mass death of the population of hostile countries, and whether our people support or oppose it.
As we all know, the core idea of Comrade Xiaoping is "development is the hard truth". Comrade Jintao also always emphasizes that "development is the top priority" and we must hold on to it tightly. But comrades often understand it one-sidedly, thinking that it is limited to our domestic development. In fact, our "development" refers to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. This rejuvenation will certainly not be limited to our current land, but will certainly expand to the whole world.
Why do I say so?
Comrade Liu Huaqing, the leader of the older generation of our party, and Comrade He Xin, a young strategist of our party, have repeatedly emphasized the theory of the shift of the center of world civilization. Our slogan of rejuvenation of China is based on this idea. You can look through our newspapers and periodicals over the years, and check online to see who in our party first proposed the slogan of national rejuvenation. It was Comrade He Xin who first proposed it. Do you know this person, He Xin? Although he rolls up his sleeves and trouser legs when giving a report, and looks like he is fighting with others, which is annoying, his historical perspective is a valuable asset of our party.
Let’s start from the beginning.
As we all know, according to the viewpoints propagated by Western scholars, all human beings on the earth originated from the same mother in Africa, so it does not matter which ethnic group has racial superiority. However, according to the research of most of our Chinese scholars, we Chinese are different from other races on the earth. We did not originate in Africa, but independently originated in the current Chinese land. The familiar Zhoukoudian Chinese ape-man is a development stage of our ancestors. The "Chinese Civilization Origin Exploration Project" currently underway in our country is to strive to fully explore the origin, process and development of ancient Chinese civilization. In the past, it has always been said that "Chinese civilization has a history of 5,000 years." Now, many of our experts engaged in archaeological, ethnic and regional cultural history research believe that the new discoveries of the Hongshan Culture in Northeast China, the Liangzhu Culture in Zhejiang, the Jinsha Site in Sichuan, and the Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Yongzhou, Hunan have further clarified the survival status of China's early civilization, proving that the history of China's rice farming culture alone can be pushed back to 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, thus breaking the "5,000-year-old Chinese civilization" theory. So we can say that we are "a cultural root system of more than one million years, a civilization progress of tens of thousands of years, an ancient country of 5,000 years, and a Chinese entity of 2,000 years." This is the Chinese nation that we are proud of and call ourselves "descendants of Yan and Huang". If Hitler's Germany advocated that the Germanic people were the most superior people on earth, then our nation is much more superior than them.
Precisely because of our long history, our nation has long spread to the Americas and the Pacific Rim, and these are the American Indians and the East Asians in various regions of the South Pacific.
As we all know, due to our national superiority, during the heyday of the Tang Dynasty, our civilization was at the top of the world. No other civilization in the world could stand shoulder to shoulder with us. We were the center of world civilization. It was only because of our later self-isolation and isolation that Western civilization surpassed us and the center of world civilization shifted to the West.
When looking back on this history, everyone will naturally be concerned about whether the center of world civilization will return to China?
In his report to the Central Committee in 1988, Comrade He Xin proposed that if the world's leading center has been located in Europe in the West since the 18th century and has shifted to the United States since the middle of the 20th century, then in the 21st century, the world's leading center will shift to the East of the earth. This "East" is of course mainly China.
Comrade Liu Huaqing actually proposed a similar idea as early as the mid-1980s. He pointed out from historical analysis that the center of world civilization is shifting, from the East to Western Europe, then to the United States, and now it is shifting back to the East. So, if the 19th century was the century of Britain and the 20th century was the century of the United States, then the 21st century is the century of China.
Consciously recognizing this historical law and welcoming the arrival of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As you all know, at the end of the last century, we built a Chinese Millennium Monument in Beijing. At the moment when the new century arrived, the leadership of the Party Central Committee held a rally to welcome the Chinese Century by holding the Zhoukoudian Torch high there. This was to follow the historical law and make the realization of the Chinese Century the goal of our Party. Later, we wrote the great goal of national rejuvenation into the political report of the 16th National Congress, and also clearly stipulated in the new Party Constitution that our Party is the vanguard of the Chinese nation. These are all major developments in Marxism and reflect the courage of our Party. As you all know, in the past, Marx and his people never said that the Communist Party was the vanguard of any nation, nor did they say that national rejuvenation could be the slogan of the Communist Party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong, a courageous national hero, only dared to raise the banner of "world proletarian revolution" and did not dare to shout the slogan of national rejuvenation the loudest.
We must hold high the banner of national rejuvenation and welcome the arrival of the Chinese Century. How can we strive to realize the Chinese Century? We must learn from the valuable experience of human history, master all the outstanding achievements of human civilization, and learn from the lessons of other nations.
This lesson is the lesson of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe losing power and the party's collapse and the lesson of the defeat of Germany and Japan. There has been a lot of discussion about the lesson of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe losing power and the party's collapse recently, so I won't talk about it here. Today I will only talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan.
As we all know, Hitler's Germany also attached great importance to the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi Party and the government specially set up a number of propaganda and education institutions, such as the "National Propaganda Guidance Office", "National Education and Propaganda Department", "World View Learning and Education Supervision Office", and "Press Office". From primary school to university, they instilled in the people of the country that the Germans were the most outstanding nation. They wanted the people to believe that their historical mission as Aryans was to become the "king of the earth" who "dominated the world". The unity of the Germans at that time was much stronger than ours now.
But in the end, Germany was defeated miserably, and Japan along with it was also defeated miserably. What was the reason? We also summarized the experience of Germany and Japan's rapid development when we studied the laws of the rise and fall of great powers at the Politburo meeting. While we are determined to follow the German path to revive China, we must never repeat the mistakes they made.
The specific reasons are as follows. First, they made too many enemies at once and did not grasp the principle of defeating them one by one. Second, they were eager for success and lacked the patience and endurance to achieve great things. Third, they were not ruthless when they should have been, which left behind troubles. Imagine if Germany and Japan could have remained neutral to the United States and fought a protracted war step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this policy and bought time to get nuclear weapons and missiles through the test, and then suddenly used nuclear weapons and missiles to attack the United States and the Soviet Union, the United States and the Soviet Union would have been unable to resist and surrendered. Especially the little Japan, which made a huge mistake and launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. That small attack did not hit the vital point of the United States, but dragged it into the war and joined the ranks of digging graves for the German, Japanese and fascists. Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won, history would have been rewritten. In that case, I am afraid that there would be no one like us controlling China, but Japan would move its capital to China and control China. Then, it might be Japan controlling China and the entire Asia, exerting the oriental wisdom, defeating the western wisdom of the Germans and unifying the world. This is all nonsense, I won’t talk about it anymore…
Fundamentally speaking, the reason why Germany and Japan suffered a disastrous defeat was that history did not arrange for them to be the "Kings of the Earth", because in fact they were the most outstanding nations.
Of course, on the surface, the history of China today is surprisingly similar to that of Germany back then. They both believe that their race is the most superior, they both have a history of being bullied by the powers and have a revenge mentality, they both have a tradition of worshipping their own authority, they both feel that their living space is seriously insufficient, they both hold high the banners of nationalism and socialism and call themselves "national socialism", they both worship "one country, one party, one leader, one doctrine",...
But if we really compare Germany with China, to use Comrade Jiang Zemin's words, it is simply child's play! How many people, how big is Germany, and how long is its history? We wiped out the Kuomintang's 8 million troops in three years, and how many opponents did they kill in Germany? Their false fire was extinguished after more than ten years, while we have been doing it for more than 80 years and are still full of vitality. We proposed the theory of the transfer of the center of civilization, which is of course much more profound than Hitler's theory of "king of the earth". The breadth and depth of our civilization determines that we are much more sophisticated than them.
The reason why we Chinese are better than the Germans is that our nation is superior to them. Therefore, we have a long history, a large population and a wide territory. On this basis, our ancestors left us two most fundamental heirlooms, which are atheism and great unity. Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, is the founder.
These two magic weapons determine that we have stronger vitality than the West, so the Chinese nation is enduring. No matter how serious the natural disasters, man-made disasters and national disasters are, we are destined to "not die in the sky and not be buried in the earth". This is our advantage. Take the war situation in response to emergencies as an example. The reason why the United States has not been destroyed so far is that the war has not officially hit its homeland. Once the enemy targets its homeland, by the time its Congress has finished debating and authorized the president to declare war, the enemy would have already hit Washington. And what about us? There is no such wrangling. Comrade Xiaoping said, "The leadership of the Party decides on issues quickly, and once it is decided, it will be implemented. There is no wrangling like in capitalist countries. This is our advantage." The democratic centralism of our party is based on the tradition of great unity. Although German fascism also emphasizes a high degree of centralization, it only focuses on the personal power of the head of state, but ignores the collective leadership of the central team. Therefore, Hitler was later deserted by his friends and relatives, which fundamentally shook the Nazi Party's war capabilities.
We are different from Germany because we are completely atheist, while Germany was originally a Catholic and Christian country, and Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that the intelligence of ordinary people was low and that the leaders should have the final say, and although the German people at that time also worshipped Hitler very much, Germany did not have a long-standing tradition of worshipping "saints" like China. The reason why our Chinese society has always worshipped "saints" is because we do not worship any gods. If you worship gods, you cannot worship people, unless you recognize who is the representative of God, just like some countries in the Middle East. And once you recognize who is a saint, of course you will be led by him, rather than you supervising and selecting him. This is the basis of our democratic centralism.
Therefore, in the final analysis, only China, not Germany, is a reliable force against Western parliamentary democracy. The emergence of Hitler's dictatorship in Germany may have been just a momentary historical misunderstanding.
At this point, you may understand why we recently issued a decision to further promote atheism. If we allow Western theism to come to China and hollow us out, if we allow the Chinese people to listen to God and follow God, who will be able to listen to us and follow us? If the people do not believe that Comrade Jintao is a qualified leader and question him and want to supervise him, if the believers in our church question why we go to the church to lead God, can our party still lead China? !
Germany's efforts to become the "King of the Earth" failed. The reason is that history did not give them this historical mission. However, Germany's three experiences are what we should learn when fulfilling our historical mission and realizing national rejuvenation. That is, we must firmly grasp the issue of national living space, firmly grasp the leadership of the ruling party, and firmly grasp the general direction of being the "King of the Earth". We must hold on to these three issues.
I will now discuss these three issues.
First, we should focus on the living space issue, which is the biggest focus of our national rejuvenation. In my last speech, I mentioned that the struggle for basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the root cause of most wars in history. In this information age, there will be changes, but there will be no fundamental changes. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany in the past. Coupled with the deteriorating effects of economic development and the rapid deterioration of the climate in the past two decades, our resources are seriously depleted and the environment is seriously deteriorating, especially the land, water and air problems, which are particularly serious. Our sustainable development and even the survival of the nation are facing serious threats, which are far more serious than those of Germany in the past. Anyone who has been to Western countries can feel that their living space is far greater than ours. There are large forests beside their highways, while we rarely see a few trees beside our roads; their sky is often blue and white clouds, while our sky is covered with a black pot lid; their tap water can be drunk by turning it on, while our groundwater is polluted and cannot be drunk without filtering; there are few people on their streets, and two or three people live in a small building, while our streets are crowded with people, and several people squeeze into one room. Many years ago, someone wrote a book titled "Yellow Peril", saying that when my country's population reaches 1.3 billion, because everyone is targeting the high consumption of the American lifestyle, the limited land resources cannot bear it, and the society will collapse. Now our population has exceeded this limit and relies on imported resources to maintain. It's not that we don't pay attention to this issue. We have a Ministry of Land and Resources that focuses on this issue every day. However, because the term "living space" has too many connections with Nazi Germany, it is inconvenient for us to talk about it publicly to avoid the West thinking of Nazi Germany and fueling the "China threat theory". Therefore, when we emphasize that "human rights are the right to survive" in accordance with He Xin's theory, we deliberately only talk about "survival" instead of "space" and avoid using the term "living space". Historically speaking, the reason why China faces the problem of living space is that Western countries developed ahead of Eastern countries, so they were able to colonize the world and thus occupy a favorable position in the issue of living space. If we want to solve this problem, we must lead our people to go out and develop abroad.
The second issue is that we must focus on the leadership ability of the ruling party. We have grasped this issue better than their National Socialist Party (i.e., the Nazi Party). Although they extended the power of the Nazi Party to all aspects of the German state power, they did not emphasize the absolute leadership of the party like we did, and did not make "the party must manage itself" the first priority like we did. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the "three magic weapons" of our party to conquer the world, he regarded the construction of our Communist Party and the leadership of the Communist Party as the most important magic weapon.
If we want to consolidate our party's leadership position and strengthen its leadership capabilities, the key is to grasp two things.
One is to promote the Three Represents theory and emphasize that our party is the vanguard of the Chinese nation and not just the vanguard of the proletariat. Many people were discussing, "We have never voted for you, the Communist Party, to represent us. How can you call yourselves our 'representatives'?"
Don't worry about this. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if you lead your allies to victory and benefit them, they will support you. Therefore, as long as we lead the Chinese people to go out and solve the problem of China's lack of living space, the Chinese people will support us, and then there will be no need to worry about the labels of "autocracy" and "dictatorship". Therefore, whether we can always represent the Chinese people depends on whether we can successfully lead the people to go out.
Therefore, this second point, whether or not the Communist Party can lead the Chinese people to go global, is the biggest and key issue concerning the Communist Party’s leadership.
Why do I say so?
As you all know, without the leadership of our Party, there would be nothing in China. Therefore, forever safeguarding the leadership of our Party is our highest purpose. Before the June 4th Incident, we vaguely realized that as long as China turned over, we could win the support and love of the people for the Communist Party, so we had to strive for decades of peace to develop China. No matter what doctrine, no matter whether the cat is white or black, as long as it can develop China, it is a good cat! However, at that time, we had not yet maturely considered how to deal with international disputes after China developed. At that time, Comrade Xiaoping proposed that the theme of the contemporary world is peace and development. But the June 4th riot sounded a warning to our Party and taught us the most memorable lesson. The pressure of China's peaceful evolution made us have to reconsider the theme of the times. We see that neither of the two issues of peace and development has been resolved. Western hostile forces always transform the world and China according to their own image, and try to overthrow the leadership of our Communist Party through peaceful evolution. Therefore, if we only engage in construction and development, there is still a possibility that the Communist Party will lose its rule. The June 4th riots almost succeeded in peaceful evolution. If it weren't for the fact that a large number of our old comrades were still alive and took power from Zhao Ziyang's team at a critical moment, we would all have been locked up, and even if we were tortured to death, we would not have the face to report to Marx. But even though the June 4th hurdle has passed, when the last batch of our old comrades have died, without us at the helm, peaceful evolution will still come to China, just like the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they put down the Hungarian incident at that time and repelled the attack of Yugoslavia's Tito revisionism, but they could not withstand Gorbachev more than 30 years later. The reason is that once the old comrades who fought for the world have died, the Communist Party's world will be taken away by peaceful evolution.
After the June 4th riots were suppressed, we have been considering how to prevent China from peacefully evolving in order to preserve the leadership of the Communist Party. We have been thinking about it, but we can't come up with a good solution. If we can't come up with a good solution, China's peaceful evolution will be inevitable, and we will become the sinners of history. After our party's deep reflection, we finally came to the conclusion: Only by transforming the developed national strength into the power of a fist to go out and leading the people to go out, can we always win the support and love of the Chinese people for the Communist Party, and our party can always be invincible. The people will not be able to do without the Communist Party, and will always be willing to follow the Communist Party, just like the couplet that was common in our rural areas before: "Listen to Chairman Mao and follow the Communist Party"!
Therefore, the June 4th riots made us realize that we must closely combine the construction and development of the country with preparing for war and leading the people to go out! Therefore, since then, our national defense policy has made a 180-degree turn. We have increasingly emphasized "combining peace and war (peacetime and wartime)". All our construction and development must be prepared for the needs of war! We still publicly emphasize that we should focus on economic construction, but in fact, economic construction is centered on war! We have spent a lot of effort to build the "Great Wall Project", building a strong underground Great Wall capable of fighting nuclear wars in coastal defense, border defense and large and medium-sized cities throughout China, and storing all necessary war materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fight the Third World War, but we must lead the people to go out and ensure the leadership of our party. In any case, our Communist Party of China will not withdraw from the stage of history! We would rather let the whole world and even the whole earth coexist with our party than withdraw from the stage of history!!! Isn't there a "nuclear bundling" theory now? That is to say, nuclear weapons bind the security of the whole world together, and if we die, everyone will die together. I think there is actually another kind of bond, that is, the fate of our party is tied to the fate of the entire world. If our Communist Party is finished, China is finished, and the world is finished.
Our party's historical mission is to lead the Chinese people to go out. If we look far ahead, we can see that history has come in this way: first, China's long history has created the world's largest mainland population and overseas Chinese population; second, in order to pursue our largest market in the world, Western capitalists who are profit-oriented must come to China to invest funds and technology to support our construction and development when we open our doors; third, the power of so many overseas Chinese has created the best conditions for my country to introduce foreign capital, foreign technology and advanced experience, so that my country's reform and opening up will inevitably achieve great success; fourth, China's economic development is bound to be accompanied by the reduction of China's per capita living space, prompting China to strive for new living space abroad; fifth, China's great development is also bound to be accompanied by the great development of our military power, which has prepared the conditions for us to go to the world and develop overseas. Since Napoleon, the West has had great fears about the awakening of the sleeping lion of China. But the sleeping lion of China standing up and going to the world is unstoppable!
What is the third issue that we should firmly grasp when fulfilling the historical mission of national rejuvenation? That is, we should unswervingly grasp the general direction of "the American issue".
Comrade Mao Zedong taught us that we must have a correct political direction. What is our greatest correct direction? It is to solve the American problem.
This may seem surprising, but the reason is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin made a fundamental assertion that made a lot of sense. In his report to the Central Committee, he asserted that China's rejuvenation was in fundamental conflict with the strategic interests of the West, so it was bound to be blocked by Western countries with all their might. Therefore, only by breaking through the blockade of Western countries led by the United States can China develop and go global!
If we want to go out and gain new living space, will the United States agree? First, if the United States resolutely blocks us, we will have a hard time doing anything to Taiwan and other countries! Second, even if we take some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much living space can we increase? It's insignificant! Only countries like the United States, Canada, and Australia have vast lands for us to colonize in large numbers.
Therefore, solving the "American problem" is the key to solving all other problems. First, it makes it possible for us to colonize there in large numbers, and even to establish another China under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. America was originally discovered by us yellow people, but Columbus gave the credit to the white people. We, the descendants of Yan and Huang, have the right to enjoy this land! I heard that the status of residents of yellow descent in the United States is very low. We must liberate them. Second, if the "American problem" is solved, European and Western countries will succumb to us, and Taiwan, Japan and other small countries are even less of a problem. Therefore, solving the "American problem" is the task that history has entrusted to us, the Chinese Communists.
Sometimes I think that China and the United States are really enemies, it's so cruel! Do you remember a movie about Liu and Deng's army called "The Decisive Battle of Central Plains"? There is a famous saying in the movie: "The road of enemies is narrow, and the brave will win!" It was with this desperate fight that we seized the Chinese mainland. History has destined China and the United States to fight each other in a narrow road of enemies! Although historically speaking, the United States did not invade and harm China like Russia and Japan, and helped China fight Japan during the War of Resistance, it will inevitably become an obstacle to our national rejuvenation in the future, and the biggest obstacle! In the long run, the relationship between China and the United States is this kind of narrow road of enemies, a life-and-death relationship.
Once, when the Americans came to visit us, they advised us to recognize that the Sino-US relationship is a mutually dependent one. Comrade Xiaoping politely replied to them: "Tell your government that there is no mutually dependent relationship between China and the United States, where neither can do without the other." In fact, Comrade Xiaoping was too polite and failed to say frankly, "The relationship between China and the United States is a life-and-death struggle."
Of course, we are not at the point of breaking off relations with them yet. Since the reform and opening up, we have relied on their funds and technology, and we cannot do without the United States, so we have tried our best to develop relations with the United States, learn from the United States in all aspects, and use the United States as an example to rebuild our country. How have we survived in international exchanges over the years? Even if we have to put on a smile, even if we have to give up the right cheek after being hit on the left cheek, we have to bite the bullet and endure it to develop relations with the United States.
Do you still remember Wu Xun in the movie "The Biography of Wu Xun"? In order to complete his mission, he endured so many punches and kicks while enduring the pain! The United States is the most successful country in the world today. Only if we learn all its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Although we are now learning the tone of Americans and saying "China and the United States are interdependent and share honor and disgrace", we should not forget that our civilization history has repeatedly taught us that there cannot be two tigers in one mountain. We must also never forget that Comrade Xiaoping emphasized "hiding one's strength and biding one's time". Its subtext is actually: for the United States, we must be patient, we must hide our ultimate goal, hide our capabilities, and wait for the opportunity. In this way, we will be clear-headed: why did we not make the national anthem "keep pace with the times" with a peaceful color, did not make the national anthem leave the theme of war, but instead, when revising the constitution this time, it was clearly stipulated for the first time that "March of the Volunteers" is our national anthem. In this way, we will also understand why we always shout "Taiwan issue" instead of "American issue". Everyone knows the truth of "repairing the plank road in the open and crossing Chencang in secret". If ordinary people can only see the small island of Taiwan, then you, as the national elite, should be able to see the overall picture of our cause. In recent years, we have ceded such a large area of northern territory to Russia in accordance with Comrade Xiaoping's deployment. Is our Party Central Committee a fool?
We need to think outside the box when solving the "American problem." In history, when a country defeated or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conquered country, because the killing efficiency of swords, spears, and even rifles and machine guns was too low, so it was impossible to get only a piece of land without the people on that land. However, if we conquered the United States according to this framework, we would not be able to colonize the United States in large numbers.
Only by using extraordinary means to "clear out" the United States can we lead the Chinese people. This is the only way, not a question of whether we are willing or not. What extraordinary means can be used to "clear out" the United States? Conventional weapons such as airplanes, cannons, missiles, and warships will not work, and highly destructive weapons such as nuclear weapons will not work either. We will not be so stupid as to really use nuclear weapons to perish with the United States, although we shout that we will do whatever it takes for the Taiwan issue. Only non-destructive weapons of mass destruction can preserve the United States intact. Modern biotechnology has developed by leaps and bounds, and new biological weapons have emerged one after another. Of course, we have not been idle. Over the years, we have raced against time to master this kind of killer mace. We are already capable of achieving the goal of suddenly "clearing out" the United States. When Comrade Xiaoping was still alive, the Central Committee made a far-sighted and correct decision: not to develop aircraft carrier battle groups, but to concentrate on developing killer maces to exterminate the enemy's population.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should first warn the American people and persuade them to leave America and give the land they live on to the Chinese people, or at least give half of America to Chinese colonization, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But will this work? If it doesn't work, there is only one way to go: use decisive means to "clear the field" in the United States and vacate the land of the United States at lightning speed! Our historical experience has proved that as long as we create a fait accompli, no one in the world can do anything to us, not to mention that the enemy headed by the United States has been eliminated, and other enemies have no choice but to bow to us.
Biological weapons are extremely cruel. But if Americans don't die, then Chinese will die. If the Chinese people are trapped and die on this existing land and a great social collapse occurs, according to the calculations of the author of "Yellow Peril", more than half of the Chinese people will die, more than 800 million people! Our yellow land carried nearly 500 million people at the beginning of liberation, and now the public population exceeds 1.3 billion. The carrying capacity of this yellow land has reached its limit. One day, it may collapse and more than half of the population will die.
We must be prepared for both situations. If the biological weapons attack succeeds, the Chinese people will pay the minimum sacrifice in the struggle against the United States. But if it fails or triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China may suffer a disaster of losing more than half of its population, so we must make good preparations for air defense in large and medium-sized cities. But no matter what, for the future of the party, the country and the nation, we can only move forward boldly! No matter how many difficulties and obstacles there are, no matter how much sacrifice we have to make! Even if more than half of the population dies, they can still regenerate, but once the Communist Party collapses, everything will be over! Forever!
In the past, when dynasties changed in China, the cruel ones won and the kind ones lost. The most typical example was that the overlord was kind and failed to "pursue the enemy" against Liu Bang, but ended up dying in front of Liu Bang. So we emphasize that we must take decisive measures. In the future, when China and the United States meet on a narrow road, if we are soft-hearted, it would be cruel to the Chinese people.
At this point, some people will inevitably ask: What about our millions of compatriots in the United States? They say, aren't we against Chinese killing Chinese?
These comrades are very pedantic and too unrealistic. If we insist that Chinese people do not kill Chinese people, can we liberate China? As for the millions of Chinese in the United States, this is of course a big problem, so we have also been researching genetic weapons in recent years, that is, biological weapons that do not kill yellow people. But this research is very difficult. Israel is at the forefront of genetic weapons research in the world. Their genetic weapons are used to deal with Arabs and protect Israelis. But even they have not reached the practical stage. We have research cooperation with Israel, and we can take some of their technology and transform the technology they use to protect Israelis to protect yellow people. But their technology is not up to standard, and it is difficult for us to surpass them within a few years. If genetic weapons can only be broken through in five to ten years, we can't wait. The limited life of us old comrades can't wait. Although old soldiers like me can wait for another five or ten years, those old comrades of the Type 38 and the few old Red Army soldiers can't wait any longer. So we have to give up our expectations for genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, most of the Chinese in the United States are a burden to us. They are used to the bourgeois liberal ideas and are not easy to accept the leadership of our party. If they survive, we will have to carry out movements to deal with them and transform them. We should not forget that when we overthrew the Kuomintang and liberated mainland China, so many bourgeois and intellectuals supported us with both hands, but later we still had to carry out "suppression of counter-revolutionaries" and "anti-rightist movement" to clean up and transform them again? Some people hid very deeply and were not dug out until the Cultural Revolution.
History has proved that any major social change will cause a large number of deaths if it is not done well. Can we say that death is the driving force for the advancement of history? How many people died in the Three Kingdoms? How many people died when Genghis Khan conquered Eurasia? How many people died when the Qing Dynasty entered the Pass? Not many people died in the Xinhai Revolution, but we overthrew the three mountains and "suppressed counter-revolutionaries", "three antis" and "five antis", and at least 20 million people died. ... We were worried that some young people would be scared when they heard about the death of people in the war. We have seen many deaths during the war, blood and flesh flying everywhere, liver and brains smeared on the ground, corpses everywhere, and blood flowing like rivers. We have seen many. On the battlefield, everyone killed people with bloodshot eyes, because it was a life-and-death struggle, and the brave would win. It is indeed cruel to ask the Americans to die 100 or 200 million people, but only this way can we exchange for the Chinese century, the century in which the Chinese Communist Party leads the world. We don't want people to die, we are revolutionary humanitarians. But if history forces us to choose: Chinese or American deaths? Is it more important to save the lives of hundreds of millions of Chinese or to save the life of our party? We can only choose the latter. Who told us to be Chinese? Who told us to be members of the Communist Party? From the first day we joined the party, the life of the party was above everything else! History will prove that our choice is correct.
Now, after I have finished talking about this, you probably understand why we are conducting this online survey. In short, our online survey is to understand if one day we secretly use decisive means to "clean up" the United States, will it provoke resistance from our people? Are the people more supportive or more opposed? Our basic judgment is that if the people agree to shoot prisoners of war and women and children, then they will agree to "clean up" the United States. For more than 20 years, China has basically been in a peaceful era, and a whole generation has not been baptized by war. In particular, since the end of World War II, the form of war, war concepts and war ethics in the world have changed greatly. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern European communist countries, Western ideology has dominated the world, and Western human nature and human rights concepts have increasingly penetrated Chinese youth. Therefore, we were not very sure about the attitude of the people. If our people are basically opposed to our "cleaning up" in the United States, we certainly need to have corresponding countermeasures.
Why did we conduct the survey online instead of through administrative channels? Of course there is a reason.
First, reducing human interference will help us understand the real thoughts of the people. In addition, it will not leak secrets and will not expose the real purpose of our investigation. The most important thing is that those who can participate in answering questions online are mainly groups with a certain cultural background and a certain level of intelligence. They are the backbone group and leaders who play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, the entire people will follow us; if they oppose us, they will play a dangerous role in the entire society, calling for a high call and rising up.
We are very pleased that they did not hand in a blank paper, but instead, they handed in an excellent score of more than 80 points. This is an outstanding achievement of our party's propaganda and education over the past decades.
Of course, there are a very small number of people who are influenced by the West and oppose shooting prisoners of war, women and children. Some of them said: "Seeing so many people say that they want to kill women and children, I am really scared. Are you all crazy?" Some said: "The Chinese claim to love peace, but in fact they are the most cruel nation. The comments are full of killing voices, which is chilling."
Although the number of people holding such views is too small to have an impact on the overall situation, we still need to intensify our propaganda efforts against such arguments.
This is to vigorously publicize Comrade He Xin's latest conclusion. His latest conclusion has long been reported to the Central Committee, and you can also find it online.
If you search online with keywords, you can see that Comrade He Xin pointed out in a conversation with Hong Kong Commercial Daily some time ago that "the United States has a shocking conspiracy." According to his information, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States, invited 500 of the world's most important politicians, economic leaders and scientists, including George Bush (who was not the president of the United States at the time), Mrs. Thatcher, Blair, Brzezinski, as well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist Naisbitt and other global hot figures, to hold a high-level roundtable meeting at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco to discuss globalization and how to guide mankind into the 21st century. According to He Xin, the global elites who attended the meeting believed that in the 21st century, only 20% of the world's population would be enough to maintain the prosperity of the world economy, and the remaining 80% or 4/5 of the world's population were human waste that could not create new value. The participants believed that this extra 80% of the population was garbage and should be gradually eliminated by "high-tech" means.
Therefore, since the enemy is secretly planning to exterminate our population, we certainly cannot be merciful to them. Comrade He Xin's report is very timely, proving the correctness of our tit-for-tat struggle and the wisdom and correctness of Comrade Xiaoping's far-sighted deployment of the strategy against the United States.
Of course, when we publicize Comrade He Xin’s speech, we cannot publish it in the party newspaper so as not to alert the enemy, because He Xin’s speech may make the enemy think that the modern science and technology we have mastered, including "clean" nuclear technology, genetic weapons technology and biological weapons technology, can provide powerful means for large-scale extermination of their population.
The last question I want to talk about is how to firmly grasp the preparations for military struggle.
We are currently at a crossroads between advancing and retreating. Some comrades have seen the rampant corruption, state-owned enterprise problems, bank bad debt problems, environmental problems, social security problems, education problems, AIDS problems, petition problems, and even riots in our country, and have wavered in their determination to prepare for military struggle. They believe that we should first tackle political reform, that our own political reform is the first priority, and that after solving domestic problems, we can then tackle external military struggle.
This reminds me of the critical period of the Chinese Revolution in 1948. At that time, the People's Liberation Army was drinking water from the Yangtze River, but the liberated areas were facing a very complicated situation. Problems that were difficult to solve occurred everywhere, and the central government received urgent warnings every day. What should we do? Should we stop and rectify the rear and internal affairs before moving forward, or should we fight across the Yangtze River in one go? Chairman Mao, with his extraordinary wisdom and courage, issued the marching order to "carry the revolution through to the end" and liberated the whole of China. It turned out that those contradictions and problems that seemed "incredible" at first were all resolved in the surging waves of the revolution.
Now we seem to be at the critical moment when the revolutionary army drank water from the Yangtze River. As long as we firmly grasp the most fundamental point of military struggle preparation, the central government believes that as long as we solve the US problem in one fell swoop, all our domestic problems will be solved. Therefore, our military struggle preparation is ostensibly aimed at Taiwan, but in fact it is aimed at the United States, far exceeding the scope of attacking aircraft carriers and satellites.
Marxism points out that violence is the midwife of the birth of a new society. So war is the midwife of the birth of the Chinese century. As war approaches us, I am full of hope for our next generation.
...........................................................................................................................
Obama proclaimed himself since "America's first Pacific president." and invites China's president Xi to US shores which many see as a mistake.