Hong Kong Hates Jackie Chan

Hong Kong Now Hates Jackie Chan

 

After a brief lull, thousands have returned to occupy some of Hong Kong's main streets as the Chinese territory enters its third consecutive weekendof pro-democracy protests and sit-ins. As my colleague Simon Denyerreports, the recent decision of Hong Kong's government to pull out of talks has galvanized the protest movement, which had been flagging this past week.

But there's one person, at least, who's guaranteed to not be among the throngs: kung fu movie star Jackie Chan.

In a message posted on Weibo, a Chinese version of Twitter, Chan parroted the rhetoric of some of the protesters' critics in Beijing and Hong Kong, urging them to "rationality" while insisting the protests were causing dangerous harm to the city's economy. Here's an English translation of his post, provided by Shanghaiist:

I found out through the news that Hong Kong’s economic losses reached HK$350 billion [$45 billion] and I’m really worried…I believe every Hong Kong resident loves Hong Kong and wishes it well! Hong Kong’s bright tomorrow requires everyone’s support and hard work…In the song "Country," one line goes: "There is no prosperous home without a strong country." I am willing to work hard with everyone and return to rationality, to face the future, love our country, love our Hong Kong.

Chan is unlikely to persuade many of those clamoring for democratic reforms in the Hong Kong he says he loves. Chan's assertions regarding what the protests are doing to the Asian metropolis's economy have beencontested. And this is hardly the first time the movie star has madecontroversial statements, especially regarding freedoms and democracy in his native city.

In 2012, Chan complained to the Chinese press that Hong Kong "had become a city of protest" and suggested that free speech be curtailed.

"People scold China's leaders, or anything else they like, and protest against everything," he told Southern People Weekly, a publication based in Guangdong province, on the other side of the border with Hong Kong. "The authorities should stipulate what issues people can protest over and on what issues it is not allowed."

Three years prior to that, at an event with Chinese business leaders in the island province of Hainan, he even speculated whether Chinese people deserved to have freedom. Here's the Associated Press report from then:

"I'm not sure if it's good to have freedom or not," Chan said. "I'm really confused now. If you're too free, you're like the way Hong Kong is now. It's very chaotic. Taiwan is also chaotic."

Chan added: "I'm gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we're not being controlled, we'll just do what we want."

According to reports, some of those in attendance greeted his remarks with rapturous applause.

Commenters on Chinese social media have already taken Chan to task fortowing the party line. The actor's star has faded slightly in recent years following a number of embarrassing scandals, including the revelation ofan extramarital affair as well as news of his own son's drug problems. His latest comments only reinforce his reputation in the minds of some as a supplicant to power who knows on which side his bread gets buttered.

But Chan is hardly the only notable Hong Konger weary of the pro-democracy protests. The vast majority of the city's powerful tycoons -- whose combined wealth and influence have made Hong Kong into a functional oligarchy -- remain in Beijing's camp. Their collusion with the status quo rankles the protesters as much as China's unwillingness to give them a genuine shot at democracy.

One of the main themes of the protests has been a call for economic justice in Hong Kong, a city with an astonishing poverty gap and where a whole generation of young people are now struggling to even find affordable housing -- a consequence, in part, of speculative investment from the mainland. Chan's muddled comments expose the tip of the iceberg of a whole bedrock of grievances Hong Kongers have with China.