Keeping an eye on Communist, Totalitarian China, and its influence both globally, and we as Canadians. I have come to the opinion that we are rarely privy to truth regarding the real goal, the agenda of Red China, and it's implications for Canada [and North America as a whole]. No more can we rely on our media as more and more information on China is actively being swept under the carpet - not for consumption.
Monday, July 20, 2020
Everyone must read this."Death to America" ..a speech by one of China's generals
GENERAL CHI HAOTIAN – THE SECRET SPEECH | YOU THINK YOU KNOW CHINA, WELL YOU BETTER THINK AGAIN!
Minister of National Defense General Chi Haotianon July12, 2000
Chi Haotianwas theDefenseministerofChinafrom 1993 – 2003.He was also vice chairmanof theChinese Communist Party’sCentral Military Commission.He delivered the following speech to a select group of high levelPartycadres.
As explained in General Chi’s speech, the Chinese Communist Party’s intention is to Militarilydefeat, occupy,and colonize the United States. This plan has been confirmed by a RUssian defector source who worked in China and had information about a joint Chino –RUssian plan to invadeNorth America. This planwas drawn up in 1992, after the fallof the Soviet Union. The division of spoilswas described thus “RUssia would get Alaska and parts of Canada. China would get the lower 48 states, with other countries invited in for ‘looting rights.’”
The speech was translated into English and firstpublished by the Epoch Times in 2005.
I’m very excited today, because the large scale online survey http://sina.com that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party’s cause will be carried on. In answering the question, “Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of War,” more than 80 percent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I’d like to focus on why we asked sina.com to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which Istarted with a discussion of the issue of the three islands, [where I] mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of “peace and development” had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China’s next phase.I also mention we have a vital stake overseas. Today, I’ll speak more specifically on these two issues.
The central issue of this survey appears to be whether oneshould shoot at women, children and prisoners of War, but its realsignificance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people’s attitude toward War is: if these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even non combatants, they’ll naturally be double ready and ruthless in killing combatants. Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards War.
Actually, however, this is not our genuineintention.The purpose of the CCP Central Committee in conducting this survey is to probe people’s Minds. We wanted to know: If China’s global development will necessitatemassive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it?
As everybody knows, the essence of ComradeXiaoping’s thinking is “developmentis the hard truth.” And Comrade Jintao, has also pointed out repeatedly and emphatically that “development is our top priority,” which should not be neglected for even a moment. But many comrades tend to understand “development” in its narrow sense, assuming it to be limited to domestic development.The fact is, our “development”refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole World.
Why do I put it this way?
Both Comrade Liu Huaquing, oneof the leaders of the old generation in our Party, and Comrade He Xin, a young strategist of our Party, have repeatedly stressed the theoryregarding the shift of the center of World Civilization. Our slogan of “revitalizing China” has this way of thinking as its basis. You may look into the newspapers and magazines published in recent years or go online to do some research to find out who raised the slogan of national revitalization first. It was Comrade He Xin. Do you know who He Xin is? He may look aggressive and despicablewhen he speaks in public,with his sleeves and pants all rolled up, but his historical vision is a treasure our Partyshould cherish.
NOTE Thus, the exploitationof nationalismand Chinese racism is openly avowed as an adjunct to communist expansionism– as Chinese National Socialism.
In discussing this issue, let us start from the beginning.
As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated fromone single motherin Africa. Therefore,no race can claim racial superiority.However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. ThePeking Manat Zhoukoudian that we are all familiar with represents a phase of our ancestors’ evolution. “The Project of Searching for the Origins of the Chinese Civilization” currently undertaken in our country is aimed at a more comprehensive and systematicresearch on the origin, process and development of the ancient Chinese civilization. We use to say, “Chinese civilization has had a history of five thousand years.” But now, many experts engaged in researchin varied fields including archeology, ethnic cultures, and regional cultures have reached consensus that the new discoveries such as the HongshanCulture in the North East, the Liangahn Culture in Zhejiang province, the Jinsha Ruins in Sichuan province, and the Yongzhou Shun Emperor Cultural Site in Hunan province are all compelling evidence of the exitence of China’s early civilizations, and they prove that China’s rice growing agricultural history alone can be traced back as far as 8,000to 10,000 years. This refutes the concept of “five thousandyears of Chinese civilization.”
Therefore, we can assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a millionyears, and a single Chinese entity of two thousandyears. This is the Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself, “descendants of Yan and Huang,” the Chinese nation that we are so proud of. Hitler’s Germany had once bragged that the German race was the most superior race on earth, but the fact is, our nation is far superior to the Germans.
During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific.
We all know that on account of our national superiority,during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the World. We were the center of the World civilization, and no other civilization in the World was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow Mindedness, and the self enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the center of the Worldshifted to the West.
In reviewing history, one may ask: will the center of the World civilization shift back to China?
Comrade He Xin put it in his report to the Central Committee in 1988: if the fact is that the center of leadership of the World was located in EUrope as of the 18th Century, and later shifted to the United States in the mid 20th century the center of leadership of the World will shift to the East of our planet. And, “the East” of course mainly refers to China.
Actually, Comrade Lui Huaquing made similar points in the 1980‘s. Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the center ofWorldcivilization is shifting. It shifted from theEast toWestern EUrope and later to theUnited States; now it is shifting back to theEast. Therefore, if we refer to the19th century as the British century, and the20th century as theAmerican century, then the 21st century will be theChinese century.
NOTE Here is a Chinese version of ‘Manifest Destiny,” with the whole World as its object of conquest.
To understand conscientiously this historical lawand to greet the advent of the Chinese Century is the historical mission of our Party. As we all know, at the end of the last century, we built the Altarto the Chinese Century in Beijing.
At the very moment of the arrival of the new millennium,the collective leadership of the Party Central Committee gathered there for a rally, upholding the torches of Zhoukoudian, to pledge themselves to get ready to greet the arrival of the Chinese Century. We were doing this to follow the historical lawand setting the realization of the Chinese century as the goal of our Party’s endeavors.
Later, in the political report of our Party’s SixteenthNational Congress, we established that national revitalization should be our great objective and explicitly specified in our new Party Constitution that our Partyis the pioneer of theChinese people. All these steps marked a major development in Marxism,reflecting our Party’s courage and wisdom.As we all know, KarlMarx and his followers have never referred to any Communist Partyas a pioneer of a certain people; neither did they say that national revitalization could be used as a slogan of a Communist Party. Even Comrade Mao Zedong,a courageous national hero, only raised high the banner of “the global proletarianrevolution,” but even he did not have the courageto give the loudest publicity to the slogan of national revitalization.
We must greet the arrival of the Chinese Century by raising high the banner of national revitalization. How should we fight for the realization of the Chinese Century? We must borrow the precious experiences in human history by taking advantage of the outstanding fruition of human civilization and drawing lessons from what happened to other ethnic groups.
The lessons include the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern EUrope, as well as the defeats of Germany and Japan in the past. Recently there has been much discussion of the lessons of the collapse of communism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern EUropean countries, so I will not dwell on them here. Today I’d like to talk about the lessons of Germany and Japan.
As we all know, NaziGermany also placed much emphasis on the education of the people, especially the younger generation. The Nazi Party and governmentorganized and established various propaganda and educational institutionssuch as the “Guiding Bureau of National Propaganda,” “Department of National Education and Propaganda,”“Supervising Bureau of Worldview Study and Education,” and “Information Office,”all aimed at instilling into the people’s Minds, from elementary schoolsto colleges, the idea that German people are superior, and convincing people that the historical mission of the Aryan people is to become the “Lords of the earth” whose rightit is to “rule over the World.” Back then the German people were much more united than we are today.
Nonetheless, Germany was defeated in utter shame, along with its ally, Japan. Why? We reached some conclusions at the study meetings of the Politburo, in which we were searching for the laws that governed the vicissitudes of the big powers, and trying to analyze Germany and Japan’s rapid growth. When we decide to revitalize based on the German model, we must not repeat the mistakes they made.
Specifically, the following are the fundamental causes for their defeat: First, they had too many enemiesall at once, as they did not adhere to the principle of eliminating enemiesoneat a time; second, they were too impetuous, lacking the patience and perseverancerequired for great accomplishments; third, when the time came for them to be ruthless, they turned out to be too soft, therefore leaving troublesthat resurfaced later on.
Let’s presume that back then Germany and Japan had been able to keep the United States neutral and had fought a protracted War step by step on the Soviet front. If they had adopted this approach, gained some time to advance their research, eventually succeeded in obtaining the technology of nuclear weapons and missiles, and launched surprise attacks against the United States and the Soviet Union using them, then the United States and the Soviet Union would not have been able to defend themselves and would have had to surrender.Little Japan, in particular, made an egregious mistakein launching the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. This attack did not hit the vital parts of the United States. Instead, it dragged the United States into the War, into the ranks of the gravediggers that eventually buried the German and Japanese fascists.
Of course, if they had not made these three mistakes and won the War, history would have been written in a different fashion. If that had been the case, China would not be in our hands. Japan might have relocated their capital to China and ruled over China. Afterwards, China and the whole of Asia under Japan’s command would have brought into full play the oriental wisdom,conquered the West ruled by Germany and unifiedthe whole World.This is irrelevant, of course. No more digressions.
So, the fundamental reason for the defeatsof Germany and Japan is that history did not arrange them to be the “Lords of the earth,” for they are, after all, not the most superior race.
Ostensibly, in comparison, today’s China is alarminglysimilar to Germany back then. Both of them regard themselves as the most superior races;both of them have a history of being exploited by foreign powers and are therefore vindictive; both of them have the tradition of worshipping their own authorities; both of them feel that they have seriously insufficientliving space; both of them raise high the twobanners of nationalism and socialism and label themselves as “national socialism”; both of them worship “one state, one party, oneleader, and one doctrine.”
And yet, if we really are to make a comparison between Germany and China, then, as Comrade Jiang Zeminput it, Germany belongs to “pediatrics”– too trivial to be compared. How large is Germany’s population? How big is its territory? And how long is its history? We eliminatedeight million nationalisttroops in only three years. How many enemies did Germany kill? They were in power for a transient period of little more than a dozen years before they perished, while we are still energetic after being around for more than eightyyears. Our theory of the shifting center of civilization is of course more profound than Hitler’s theory of “the Lords of the earth.” Our civilization is profound and broad, which has determined that we are so much wiser than they were.
Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity.It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages.
This heritage determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than theWest. That is why the Chinese racehas been able to prosper for so long. We are destined “not to be buried by either Heaven or earth” no matter how severe the natural, man made, and national disasters.This is our advantage.
Take response to War as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen Waron its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, these enemies would reach Washington before its congressfinishes debating and authorizes the presidentto declare War.But for us, we don’t waste time on these trivial things.Comrade Deng Xiaoping once said, “The Party’s leadership is prompt in making decisions. Once a decision is made, it is immediately implemented. There’s no wasting time on trivial things like in capitalistcountries. This is our advantage! Our Party’s democratic centralism is built on the tradition of great unity. Although fascistGermany also stressed high level centralism, they only focused on power of the top leader, but ignored the collective leadershipof the central group.That’s why Hitler was betrayed by many later in his life, which fundamentally depleted the Nazis of their War capacity.
What makes us different from Germany is that we are complete atheists, while Germany was primarily a Catholicand Protestantcountry. Hitler was only half atheist. Although Hitler also believed that ordinary citizens had low intelligence,and that leadersshould therefore make decisions,and although German people worshipped Hitler back then, Germany did not have the tradition of worshipping sageson a broad basis.Our Chinese society has always worshipped sages, and that is because we don’t worship any God. Once you worship aGod, you can’t worship a person at the same time, unless you recognize the person as the God’s representative like they do in Middle Eastern countries. On the other hand, once you recognize a person as a sage, of course you will want him to be your leader(…) This is the foundation of our democratic centralism.
The bottom line is, only China is a reliable force in resisting the Western parliament based democratic system.Hitler’s dictatorshipin Germany was perhaps but a momentary mistake in history.
Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common peopledon’t believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader,question his authority,and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leaving God in churches, can our Partycontinue to rule China?
Germany’s dream to be the “Lord of the earth” failed, because ultimately, history did not bestow this great mission upon them. But the threelessons Germany learned from experience are what we ought to remember as we complete our historic mission and revitalize our race. The threelessons are: firmly grasp the country’s living space; firmly grasp the Party’s control over the nation; and firmly grasp the general directiontoward becoming the “Lord of the earth.”
Next,I’d like to address these three issues.
The firstissue is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of Wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany’s back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resourcesare in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air.Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race,but even its survival is gravely threatened,to a degree much greater than faced by Germany back then.
Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets.Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered by a layer of dark haze.Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is sopollutedthat it can’t be drunk without filtering. They have few people in the streets, and twoor threepeople can occupy a small residential building; in contrast, our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share on room.
Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following theAmerican style of consumption,our limited resourceswould not long support the population and society would collapse,once our population reaches 1.3billion.Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It’s not that we haven’t paid attention to this issue. The Ministry ofLandResourcesis specialized in this issue.
But the term ‘living space’(Lebensraum)is too closely related to NaziGermany. The reason we don’t want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West’s association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin’s new theory,“Human rights are just living rights,” we only talk about “living,” but not “space,”so as to avoid using the term “living space.”From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries established colonies ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries established colonies all around the World, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem,we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they could develop outside of China.
The second issue is our focus on the leadership capacity of the ruling Party. We’ve done better on this than their Party.Although the Nazisspread their power to every aspect of the German national government, they did not stress their absolute leadershipposition like we have. They did not take the issue of managing the powerof the Party as first priority, which we have. When Comrade Mao Zedong summarized the “three treasures”of our Party’s victory in conquering the country, he considered the most important “treasure”to be developing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and strengthening its leadership position.
We have to focus on twopoints to fortify our leadership positionand improve our leadership capacity.
The firstis to promote the “Three Represents” theory, stressing that our Party is the pioneerof the Chinese race, in addition to being the pioneerof the proletariat.Many citizens say in private, “We nevervoted for you, the CommunistParty, to represent us. How can you claim to be our representatives?”
There’s no need to worry about this issue. Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we could lead the Chinese people outside of China, resolving the lack of living space in China, the Chinese people will support us. At that time, we don’t’ have to worry about the labels of “totalitarianism”or “dictatorship.”Whether we can forever represent theChinese people depends on whether we can succeed in leading theChinese people out ofChina.
The second point, whether we can leadthe Chinese people outof China, is the most important determinant of the CCP’s leadership position.
Why do I say this?
Everyone knows that without the leadership of our Party, China would not exist today. Therefore, our highest principle is to forever protectour Party’s leadership position. Before June4, we realized vaguely that as long as China’s economy is developed, people would support and lovethe Communist Party. Therefore we had to use several decadesof peacetime to develop China’s economy. No matter what isms,whether it is a white cat or a black cat, it is a good cat if it can develop China’s economy. But at that time, we did not have mature ideas about how China would deal with international disputes after its economy becomes developed.
Comrade Xiaopingsaid then that the main themes in the World were peace and development. But the June 4 riot gave our Partyawarningand gave us a lesson that is still fresh.
The pressure of China’s peaceful evolution makes us reconsider of these twomain themes of our time. We see that neither of these twoissues, peace and development, have been resolved. The Western oppositional forces always change the Worldaccording to their own visions; they want to change China and use peaceful evolution to overturn the leadershipof our Communist Party. Therefore, if we only develop the economy, we still face the possibility of losing control.
The June 4riotalmost succeeded in bringing a peaceful transition; if it were not for the fact that a large number of veteran comrades were still aliveand at a crucial moment they removed Zhao Ziyang and his followers, then we all would have been put in prison.After death we would have been too ashamed to report to Marx. Although we have passed the test of June 4, after our group of senior comradespass away, without our control,peaceful evolution may still come to China like it did to the former Soviet Union. In 1956, they suppressed the Hungarian incident and defeatedthe attacksby Tito’s revisionists of Yugoslavia, but they could not withstand Gorbachevthirtysome years later. Once those pioneering senior comrades died, the power of the Communist Party was taken away by peaceful evolution.
After the June 4 riot was suppressed, we have been thinking about how to prevent China from peaceful evolution and how to maintain the Communist Party’s leadership. We thought it over and over but did not come up with any good ideas. If we do not have good ideas, China will inevitably change peacefully, and we will all become criminals in history.After some deep pondering, we finally come to this conclusion: only by turning our developed national strength into the force of a first striking outward– only by leading people to go out – can we win forever the Chinese people’s support and love for the Communist Party. Our Partywill then stand on invincible ground, and the Chinese people will have to depend on the Communist Party. They will forever follow the Communist Party with their hearts and Minds, as was written in a couplet frequently seen in the countryside some years ago: “Listen to ChairmanMao, follow the CommunistParty!” Therefore, the June 4 riot made us realize that we must combine economic development with preparation for War and leading the people to go out!Therefore, since then, our national Defence policyhas taken a 180 degree turn and we have since emphasized more and more “combining peace and War.” Our economic development is all about preparing for the needs of War! Publicly we still emphasize economic development as our center,but in reality,economic development has Waras its center!We have made a tremendous effort to construct “The Great Wall Project”to build up, along our coastal and land frontiers as well as around large and mediumsized cities, a solid underground “Great Wall”that can withstand a nuclear War.We are also storing all necessary War materials. Therefore, we will not hesitate to fighta World War III, so as to lead the people to go out and to ensure the Party’s leadership position. In any event, we, the CCP, will never step down from the stage of history! We’d rather have the whole World, or even the entire globe, share life and death with us than step down from the stage of history! Isn’t there a “nuclear bondage” theory?It means that since nuclearwepaons have bound the security of the entire World, all will die together if death is inevitable.In my view, there is another kind of bondage, and that is, the fate of our Party is tied up with that of the whole World.If we, theCCP, are finished, Chinawill be finished,and theWorld will be finished.
OurParty’s historical mission is to lead the Chinesepeople to go out. If we take the long view, we will see that history led us on this path.First, China’s long history has resulted in the World’s largest population, including Chinese inChina as well as overseas.Second,once we open our doors, the profit seeking Western capitalistswill invest capital and technology in China to assist our development, so that they can occupy the biggest market in theWorld.Third, our numerous overseasChinese help us create the most favorable environment for the introduction of foreign capital,foreign technology, and advanced experience into China. Thus, it is guaranteed that our reform and open door policy will achieve tremendous success. Fourth,China’s great economic expansion will inevitably lead to the shrinkage of per capita living space for the Chinese people, and this will encourage China to turn outward in search for new living space.Fifth, China’s great economic expansion will inevitably come with significant development in our Military forces, creating conditions for our expansion overseas. Ever since Napoleon Bonaparte’s time, the West has been alert for the possible awakening of the sleeping lion that is China. Now, the sleeping lion is standing up and advancing into the World, and has become unstoppable!
What is the thirdissue we should clinch firmly in order to accomplish our historical mission of national renaissance?It is to hold firmly onto the big “issue ofAmerica.”
This appears to be shocking, but the logic is actually very simple.
Comrade He Xin put forward a very fundamental judgment that is very reasonable. He asserted in his report to the Party Central Committee: The renaissance of China is in fundamental conflictwith the Western strategic interest, and therefore will inevitably be obstructed by the Western countries doing everything they can. So, only by breakingthe blockade formed by the Western countries headed by the United States can China grow and move toward the World!
Would the UnitedStates allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, [so] how much more living spacecan we get?Very trivial! Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization.
Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the key to solving all other issues. First,this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellowrace,but Columbus gave credit to the white race.We the descendants of the Chinese nation are entitled to the possession of the land! It is said that the residents of the yellowrace have a very low social statusin the United States. We need to liberate them.Second, after solving the “issue of America,” the Western countries of EUrope would bow to us, not to mention Taiwan, Japan and other small countries. Therefore, solving the “issue of America” is the mission assigned to the CCP members by history.
I sometimes think how cruel it is for China and the United States to be enemies that are bound to meet on a narrow road!Do you remember a movie about Liberation Army Troops led by Liu Bocheng and Deng Xiaoping? The title is something like “Decisive Battle on the Central Plains.” There is a famous remark in the movie that is full of power and grandeur: “The enemies are bound to meet on a narrow road, only the bravewill win!”It is this kind of fightingto win or diespirit that enabled us to seize powerin Mainland China. It is historical destinythat China and the United States will come to unavoidable confrontationon a narrow path and fight each other!The United States, unlike Russia and Japan, has never occupied and hurtChina, and also assisted China in its battle against the Japanese. But, it will certainly be an obstruction,and the biggest obstruction! In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is oneof a life and death struggle.
One time, some Americans came to visit and tried to convince us that the relationship between China and the United States is one of interdependence.Comrade Xiaoping replied in a polite manner: “Go tell your government, China and the United States do not have such a relationship that is interdependent and mutually reliant.” Actually, Comrade Xiaopingwas being too polite, he could have been more frank,“The relationship between China and the United States is one of lifeanddeathstruggle.” Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside World still rely on their capital and technology, we still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country.
How have we managed our foreign affairsin these years? Even if we had to put on a smiling face in order to please them, even if we have to give them the right cheek after they had hitour left cheek,we still must endure in order to further our relationshipwith the United States. Do you remember the character of Wuxun in the movie the “Story of Wuxun”?In order to accomplish his mission, he endured so much pain and suffered so much beating and kicking!The United States is the most successful country in the Worldtoday. Only after we have learned all of its useful experiences can we replace it in the future. Even though we are presently imitating the American tone “China and the United States rely on each other and share honor and disgrace,” we must not forget that the history of our civilization repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to livetogether.
We also must never forget what Comrade Xiaoping emphasized: “Refrain from revealing ambitions and put others off the track.” The hidden message is: we must put up with America; we must conceal our ultimate goals,hide our capabilities,and await the opportunity. In this way, our Mind is clear. Why have we not updated our national anthem with something peaceful?Why did we not change the anthem’s theme of War? Instead, when revising the Constitution this time, for the first time we clearly specified “March of the Volunteers” is our national anthem. Thus we will understand why we constantly talk loudly about the “Taiwan issue”but not the “American issue.” We all know the principle of “doing one thing under the cover of another.” If ordinary peoplecan only see the small island of Taiwan in their eyes, then you as the elite of our country should be able to see the whole picture of our cause.Over these years, according to Comrade Xiaoping’s arrangement, a large piece of our territory in the North has been given up to RUssia; do you really think our Party Committee is a fool?
To resolve the issue of America we must be able to transcend conventions and restrictions.In history, when a country defeated another country or occupied another country, it could not kill all the people in the conqueredland because back then you could not kill people effectively with sabersor long spears,or even with riflesor machine guns.Therefore, it was impossible to gain a stretch of land without keeping the people on that land. However, if we conqueredAmerica in this fashion, we would not be able to make many people migrate there.
Only by using special means to “clean up”America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. This is the only choice left for us. This is not a matter of whether we are willing to do it or not. What kind of specialmeans is there available for us to “clean up America”?
Conventionalweapons such as fighters, canons, missilesandbattleships won’t do; neither will highlydestructive weaponssuch asnuclearweapons. We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons, despite the fact that we have been exclaiming that we will have the Taiwan issueresolvedat whatever cost. Only by using non destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserveAmerica for ourselves. There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bioweapons have been invented one after another. Of course, we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to masterweapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of “cleaning up”America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaopingwas still with us, the Party Central Committee had the perspicacity to make the rightdecision not to develop aircraft carrier groupsand focus instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy country.
From a humanitarian perspective, we should issue a warning to the American people and persuade them to leave America and leave the land they have lived in to the Chinese people. Or at least they should leave halfof the United States to be China’s colony, because America was first discovered by the Chinese. But would this work? If this strategy does not work, then there is only one choice left to us. That is, use decisive means to “clean up”America and reserve America for our use in a moment. Our historical experience has proven that as long as we make it happen, nobody in the Worldcan do anything about us. Furthermore, if the United States as the leader is gone, then other enemies have to surrender to us.
Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if theAmericans do not die then theChinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place. According to the computation of the author of YellowPeril, more than halfof the Chinese will die, and that figurewould be more than 800 millionpeople! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellowland has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who knows how soon it will come, the great collapsewill occur any time and more thanhalfthe population will have to go.
We must prepare ourselves for two scenarios.If our biological weapons succeed in the surprise attack, the Chinese people will be able to keep their losses at a minimum in the fightagainst the United States. If, however, the attack failsand triggers a nuclear retaliation from the United States, China would perhaps sufferAcatastrophein which more than half of its population would perish. That is why we need to be ready with air defense systemsfor our big and medium sized cities. Whatever the case may be, we can only move forward fearlessly, for the sake of our Partyand Stateand our nation’s future, regardless of the hardships we have to face and the sacrificeswe have to make. The population, even ifmore than halfdies, can bereproduced. But if the Party falls, everything is gone, and forever gone.
InChinese history, in thereplacement of dynasties,theruthless have alwayswon and thebenevolent have alwaysfailed. The most typical example involved Xiang Yu the King of Chu, who, after defeatingLiu Bang, failedto continue to chase after him and eliminate hisforces, and his leniency resulted in Xiang Yu’s death and Liu’s victory (…) Therefore, we must emphasize the importance of adopting resolute measures. In the future, the two rivals,China and the United States, will eventually meet each other in a narrow road,and our leniency to the Americans will mean crueltytoward the Chinese people. Here some people may want to ask me: what about the several millionsof our compatriots in the United States? They may ask: aren’t we against Chinese killingother Chinese?
These comrades are too pedantic; they are not pragmatic enough. If we had insisted on the principle that the Chinese should not kill other Chinese, would we have liberated China?As for the several millionChinese living in the United States, this is of course a big issue.Therefore, in recent years, we have been conducting research on geneticweapons, this is, those weapons that do not kill yellow people. But producing a result with this kind of research is extremely difficult.
Of the research done on genetic weapons throughout the World, Israel is the most advanced. Their genetic weapons are designed to targetArabs and protect the Israelis. But even they have not reached the stage of actual deployment.We have cooperated with Israel on some research.Perhaps we can introduce some of the technologies used to protect Israelis and remold these technologies to protect the yellow people. But their technologies are not mature yet, and it is difficult for us to surpass them in a few years. If it has to be five or ten years before some breakthrough can be achieved in genetic weapons, we cannot afford to wait any longer.
Old comrades like us cannot afford to waitthat long, for we don’t have that much time to live.Old soldiers of my age may be able to wait for fiveor tenmore years, but those from the period of the antiJapanese Waror the few oldRedArmysoldierscannot wait any longer.
Therefore, we have to give up our expectations about genetic weapons. Of course, from another perspective, the majority of those Chinese living in the United States have become our burden,because they have been corrupted by the bourgeois liberal valuesfor a long time and it would be difficult for them to accept our Party’s leadership. If they survived the War, we would have to launch campaigns in the future to dealwith them, to reform them. Do you still remember that when we had just defeated the Koumintang(KMT) and liberatedMainlandChina, so many people from the bourgeois classand intellectuals welcomed us so very warmly, but later we had to launch campaignssuch as the “suppression of the reactionaries” and “Anti Rightist Movement” to clean them up and reform them?Some of them were in hiding for a long time and were not exposed until the Cultural Revolution. History has proved that any social turmoil is likely to involve many deaths.
Maybe we can put it this way: death is the enginethat moves history forward. During the period of the three Kingdoms, how many people died? When Genghis Khan conquered EUrasia, how many people died?When Manchuinvadedthe interiorof China, how many people died? Not many people died during the 1911Revolution, but when we overthrew the ThreeGreat Mountains, and during the political campaignssuch as “suppression of the reactionaries,”“Three Anti Campaign,” and “Five Anti Campaign,” at least 20 millionpeople died. We were apprehensive that some young people today would be trembling with fear when they hear about Wars and people dying.
During Wartime, we were used to seeing dead people. Blood andflesh were flying everywhere, corpseswere lying in heaps on the fields, and blood ran like rivers. We saw it all. On the battlefields, everybody’s eyes turned red with killing because it was a life and death struggle and only the brave would survive.
It is indeedbrutalto killoneortwo hundred millionAmericans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century in which theCCPleads theWorld. We, asrevolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths.But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths ofChinese and those of Americans, we’d have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of theChinese people and the life of ourParty. That is because, after all, we are Chinese and members of theCCP. Since the day we joined theCCP, the Party, life has always been above all else! History will prove that we made the rightchoice.
Now, when Iam about to finish my speech, you probably understand why we wanted to know, whether the people would rise against us if one day we secretlyadopt resolute means to “clean up”America. For over twenty years, China has been enjoying peace, and a whole generation has not been tested by War.In particular, since the end of World War II, there have been many changes in the formats of War, the concept of War and the ethics of War. Especially since the collapse of the former Soviet Union and Eastern EUropean Communist states, the ideologyof the West has come to dominate the Worldas a whole, and the Western theory of human nature and Western view of human rights have increasingly been disseminated among the young people in China. Therefore, we were not very sure about the people’s attitude. If our people are fundamentally opposed to “cleaning up”America, we will, of course, have to adopt corresponding measures.
Why didn’t we conduct the survey through administrative meansinstead of through the web? We did what we did for a good reason.
First of all, we did it to reduce artificial inference and to make sure that we got the truethoughts of the people.In addition, it is more confidential and won’t reveal the truepurpose of our survey.But what is most important is the fact that most of the people who are able to respond to the questions online are from social groups that are relatively well educated and intelligent. They are the hard core and leading groups that play a decisive role among our people. If they support us, then the people as a whole will follow us. If they oppose us, they will play the dangerous role of inciting people and creating social disturbance.
What turned out to be very comforting is they did not turn in a blank test paper. In fact, they turned in a test paper with a score of over 80. This is the excellent fruition of our Party’s work in propaganda and education over the past few decades.
Of course, a few people under Western influence have objected to shooting at prisoners of war and women and children.Is everybody crazy? Some others said, “The Chinese love to label themselves as a peaceloving people, but actually they are the most ruthless people. The comments are resonant of killing and murdering, sending chills to my heart.”
Although there are not too many people holding this kind of viewpointand they will not affect the overall situation in any significant way,but we still need to strengthen the propaganda to respond to this kind of argument.
That is to vigorously propagateComrade He Xin’s latest article, which has already been reported to the central government. You may look it up on the website.
If you get on the website using key words to search,you will find out that a while ago comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong KongBusiness News during an interview that: “The U.S. has a shocking conspiracy.”According to what he had in hand, from September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation, funded by the United States, gathered 500of the World’s most important statesmen, economic leadersand scientists, including George W Bush (he was not the USpresident at the time), the Baroness Thatcher,Tony Blair,Zbigniew Brzezinski,as well as George Soros, Bill Gates,futurist John Naisbitt, et cetera, all of the World’s most popular characters, in the San Francisco FairmontHotel for a high level roundtable conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the outstanding people of the World in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere 20percent of the World’s population will be sufficient to maintain the World’s economy and prosperity, the other 80 percent or 4/5th’s of the World’s population will be human garbageunable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought that this excess 80 percent population would be a trash population and “high tech”meansshould be used to eliminatethem gradually.
NOTE In this bit of mirror imaging we find the very likeness of the Communist Bloc in terms of War plans involving the use of weapons of mass destruction. It is bizarre to assert there is a similar intention in the West, which is politically and socially incapable of following through on any such plans. Was the San FranciscoeventAprovocation?
Since the enemiesare secretly planning to eliminate our population, we certainly cannot be infinitely merciful and compassionate to them. Comrade He Xin’s article came out at the right time, it has proven the correctness of our tit for tat battleapproach (…) [and] Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s great foresight to deployagainst the United States Military strategy.
Certainly, in spreading Comrade He Xin’s views, we cannot publish the article in the Partynewspapers, in order to avoid raising the enemy’s vigilance.He Xin’s conversationmay reMind the enemy that we have grasped the modern science and technology, including “clean”nuclear technology as well as biological weaponstechnology,and we can use powerful measures to eliminate their population on a large scale.
NOTE General Chimakes a subtle point. They cannot hide everything, but they can hide what is most alarming and most decisive.
The last problemI want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for Military battle.
Currently, we are at the crossroad of moving forward or backward. Some comrades saw problems floodingeverywhere in our country – the corruption problem, the state owned enterprise problem, the bank’s bad accounts problem, environmental problems, society security problems, education problems, the AIDS problem, various appeals problems, even the riots problem.These comradesvacillated in the determination to prepare for Military battles. They thought: they should first grab the political reform problem, that is, our own political reform comes first. After resolving the domestic problems, we can then deal with the foreign Military battle problem.
This reMinds me of the crucial period in 1948 in the Chinese Revolution. At that time the People’s Liberation Army’s “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River, but they faced extremely complex situationsand difficult problems everywhere in the liberated areas,and the central authorityreceived emergency reports daily. What to do? Should we stop to manage rear areas and internal mattersfirst before moving forward,or press on to pass the Yangtze River with onevigorous effort?Chairman Mao,with his extraordinary wisdom and mettle gave the marching order “Carry on the revolution to the end,” and liberated all of China. The previously thought “serious” conflicting problemswere all resolved in this great forward moving revolutionary wave.
Now, it seems like we are in the same critical periodas the “horses were drinking water” in the Yangtze River days in the revolutionary era,as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problemswill all be readily solved. Therefore, our Military battle preparation appears to aim at Taiwan but in fact is aimed at the United States, and the preparationis far beyond the scope of attacking aircraft carriers or satellites.
Marxismpointed out that violence is the midwife for the birth of China’s century.As Warapproaches,I am full of hope for our next generation.