Sunday, March 23, 2014

the Vice-Chairman of China's Military Commission to top officers and generals....a speech, a warning

Image result for US President Bill Clinton meets with Chinese Defense Minister Chi Haotian in the Oval OfficeImage result for US President Bill Clinton meets with Chinese Defense Minister Chi Haotian in the Oval Office

The following is the actual text of a speech delivered in December, 2005 by Comrade Chi Haotian --the Vice-Chairman of China's Military Commission to top officers and generals. Keep in mind that China has for many years advocated deceitful and covert warfare against its enemies. This is their Modus Operandi. There hould be little question that a "Bird Flu" Pandemic would deeply excite them. (Don't forget how they have poisoned thousands of American pets and knowingly placed lead paints on toddler's toys.)

"Comrades, I'm very excited today, because the large-scale online survey that was done for us showed that our next generation is quite promising and our Party's cause will be carried on. In answering the question, "Will you shoot at women, children and prisoners of war," more than 80 per cent of the respondents answered in the affirmative, exceeding by far our expectations.
Today I'd like to focus on why we asked to conduct this online survey among our people. My speech today is a sequel to my speech last time, during which I started with a discussion of the issue of the three islands [Taiwan, Diaoyu Islands and the Spratley Islands --- Ott] and mentioned that 20 years of the idyllic theme of 'peace and development' had come to an end, and concluded that modernization under the saber is the only option for China's next phase. I also mentioned we have a vital stake overseas.

The central issue of this survey appears to be whether one should shoot at women, children and prisoners of war, but its real significance goes far beyond that. Ostensibly, our intention is mainly to figure out what the Chinese people's attitude towards war is: If these future soldiers do not hesitate to kill even noncombatants, they'll naturally be doubly ready and ruthless in killing combatants.

Therefore, the responses to the survey questions may reflect the general attitude people have towards war. . .. . ...We wanted to know: If China's global development will necessitate massive deaths in enemy countries, will our people endorse that scenario? Will they be for or against it? The fact is, our 'development' refers to the great revitalization of the Chinese nation, which, of course, is not limited to the land we have now but also includes the whole world.

As everybody knows, according to the views propagated by the Western scholars, humanity as a whole originated from one single mother in Africa. Therefore no race can claim racial superiority. However, according to the research conducted by most Chinese scholars, the Chinese are different from other races on earth. We did not originate in Africa. Instead, we originated independently in the land of China. Therefore, we can rightfully assert that we are the product of cultural roots of more than a million years, civilization and progress of more than ten thousand years, an ancient nation of five thousand years, and a single Chinese entity of two thousand years. This is the Chinese nation that calls itself 'descendants of Yan and Huang. During our long history, our people have disseminated throughout the Americas and the regions along the Pacific Rim, and they became Indians in the Americas and the East Asian ethnic groups in the South Pacific.

We all know that on account of our national superiority, during the thriving and prosperous Tang Dynasty our civilization was at the peak of the world. We were the centre of the world civilization, and no other civilization in the world was comparable to ours. Later on, because of our complacency, narrow-mindedness, and the self-enclosure of our own country, we were surpassed by Western civilization, and the centre of the world shifted to the West.

In reviewing history, one may ask: Will the centre of the world civilization shift back to China? Actually, Comrade Liu Huaqing made similar points in early 1980's Based on an historical analysis, he pointed out that the centre of world civilization is shifting. It shifted from the East to Western Europe and later to the United States; now it is shifting back to the East. Therefore, if we refer to the 19th
Century as the British Century and the 20th century as the American Century, then the 21st Century will be the Chinese Century!! (Wild applause fills the auditorium.)

Our Chinese people are wiser than the Germans because, fundamentally, our race is superior to theirs. As a result, we have a longer history, more people, and larger land area. On this basis, our ancestors left us with the two most essential heritages, which are atheism and great unity. It was Confucius, the founder of our Chinese culture, who gave us these heritages. These two heritages determined that we have a stronger ability to survive than the West. That is why the Chinese race has been able to prosper for so long. 

We are destined 'not to be buried by either heaven or earth' no matter how severe the natural, man-made, and national disasters. This is our advantage. Take response to war as an example. The reason that the United States remains today is that it has never seen war on its mainland. Once its enemies aim at the mainland, the enemies would have already reached Washington before its congress finishes debating and authorizes the president to declare war. But for us, we don't waste time on these trivial things.

Maybe you have now come to understand why we recently decided to further promulgate atheism. If we let theology from the West into China and empty us from the inside, if we let all Chinese people listen to God and follow God, who will obediently listen to us and follow us? If the common people don't believe Comrade Hu Jintao is a qualified leader, begin to question his authority, and want to monitor him, if the religious followers in our society question why we are leading
God in churches, can our Party continue to rule China??

The first pressing issue facing us is living space. This is the biggest focus of the revitalization of the Chinese race. In my last speech, I said that the fight over basic living resources (including land and ocean) is the source of the vast majority of wars in history. This may change in the information age, but not fundamentally. Our per capita resources are much less than those of Germany's back then. In addition, economic development in the last twenty-plus years had a negative impact, and climates are rapidly changing for the worse. Our resources are in very short supply. The environment is severely polluted, especially that of soil, water, and air. Not only our ability to sustain and develop our race, but even its survival is gravely threatened, to a degree much greater than faced Germany back then.

Anybody who has been to Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests alongside the highways, while we hardly have any trees by our streets. Their sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with a layer of dark haze. Their tap water is clean enough for drinking, while even our ground water is so polluted that it can't be drunk without filtering.

They have few people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small residential building; in contrast our streets are always crawling with people, and several people have to share one room. Many years ago, there was a book titled Yellow Catastrophes. It said that, due to our following the American style of consumption, our limited resources would no longer support the population and society would collapse once our population reaches 1.3 billion. Now our population has already exceeded this limit, and we are now relying on imports to sustain our nation. It's not that we haven't paid attention to this issue. The Ministry of Land Resources is specialized in this issue.

But we must understand that the term 'living space' (lebenstraum) is too closely related to Nazi Germany. The reason we don't want to discuss this too openly is to avoid the West's association of us with Nazi Germany, which could in turn reinforce the view that China is a threat. Therefore, in our emphasis on He Xin's new theory, 'Human Rights are just living rights' we only talk about 'living' but not 'space' so as to avoid using the term 'living space.

From the perspective of history, the reason that China is faced with the issue of living space is because Western countries have developed ahead of Eastern countries. Western countries
established colonies all around the world, therefore giving themselves an advantage on the issue of living space. To solve this problem, we must lead the Chinese people outside of China, so that they can develop outside of China.

Would the United States allow us to go out to gain new living space? First, if the United States is firm in blocking us, it is hard for us to do anything significant to Taiwan and some other countries! Second, even if we could snatch some land from Taiwan, Vietnam, India, or even Japan, how much more living space can we get? Very trivial!

Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to serve our need for mass colonization. Therefore, solving the 'issue of America' is the key to solving all other issues.

First, this makes it possible for us to have many people migrate there and even establish another China under the same leadership of the CCP. America was originally discovered by the ancestors of the yellow race, but Columbus gave credit to the White race. 

We the descendants of the Chinese nation are ENTITLED to the possession of the land!!! It is historical destiny that China and United States will come into unavoidable confrontation on a narrow path and fight. In the long run, the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.

Of course, right now it is not the time to openly break up with them yet. Our reform and opening to the outside world still rely on their capital and technology. We still need America. Therefore, we must do everything we can to promote our relationship with America, learn from America in all aspects and use America as an example to reconstruct our country.

Only by using special means to 'clean up' America will we be able to lead the Chinese people there. Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves. 

There has been rapid development of modern biological technology, and new bio weapons have been invented one after another. Of course we have not been idle; in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind. We are capable of achieving our purpose of 'cleaning up' America all of a sudden. When Comrade Xiaoping was still with us, the Party Central committee had the perspicacity to make the right decision not to develop aircraft carrier groups and focused instead on developing lethal weapons that can eliminate mass populations of the enemy

Biological weapons are unprecedented in their ruthlessness, but if the Americans do not die then the Chinese have to die. If the Chinese people are strapped to the present land, a total societal collapse is bound to take place.

According to the computations of the author of Yellow Peril, more than half of the Chinese will die, and that figure would be more than 800 million people! Just after the liberation, our yellow land supported nearly 500 million people, while today the official figure of the population is more than 1.3 billion. This yellow land has reached the limit of its capacity. One day, who know how soon it will come, the great collapse will occur any time and more than half of the population will have to go.

It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century, a century in which the CCP leads the world. We, as revolutionary humanitarians, do not want deaths, But if history confronts us with a choice between deaths of Chinese and those of Americans, we'd have to pick the latter, as, for us, it is more important to safeguard the lives of the Chinese people and the life of our Party.

The last problem I want to talk about is of firmly seizing the preparations for military battle. The central committee believes, as long as we resolve the United States problem at one blow, our domestic problems will all be readily solved.

"The war is not far from us, he is the obstetrics of the Chinese Century" Chi Haotian, China's defense minister.  (AP Photo / Xinhua, Ma Zhancheng)
"The war is not far from us, he is the obstetrics of the Chinese Century" Chi Haotian, China's defense minister. (AP Photo / Xinhua, Ma Zhancheng)

Communist Party of China plans nuclear strike

Epoch Times, Thursday 25 August 2005 23:54

"Our economic development is used exclusively for the preparation of war." Chi Haotian , Defense Minister of China to 2004
Several Chinese news sites published recently speeches by Chi Haotian, vice chairman of the powerful Military Commission and former Chinese Minister of Defense. These speeches aroused great excitement among the Chinese population. Find The majority of the Chinese, who commented on the speeches that this very clearly reflect the ideology of the CCP.
An atomic and biological war against the United States is to ensure the survival of the Communist Party of China (CPC). This explained the former Chinese Defense Minister and current Vice Chairman of the Military Commission, Chi Haotian, in his speeches, "The war is coming towards us" and "War is not far from us, he is the obstetrics of the Chinese century", which has recently been on several news sites are disseminated and discussed in China. In these speeches explains Chi, a nuclear and biological first strike against America is intended to ensure the survival of the CCP in China. At the same time you want by turning off the United States are "Chinese century" launched - the global supremacy of the "Chinese master race".
By an appropriately strong military first strike with nuclear and biological weapons , the combat power of the United States should at once broken and a nuclear war can be avoided. "Even if a nuclear war were to break out, this would be no problem for the Chinese population. You would multiply again within a short time. "Said Chi. The losses on the Chinese side, he estimates in this case, seven or eight hundred million people. In the U.S., the number of victims would in any case be at one-to two hundred million.
"The expansion plans of China's military is not only directed at Taiwan," even the Taiwanese president, Chen Shui-bian confirmed to the Australian press. "Some of the deployed missiles have a range of around 10,000 km.So you can also destinations in the U.S., Japan and Australia meet. "
In China, the pressure on the communist totalitarian ruling party is getting stronger. In the recent past, contributed "Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party" (as reported) to a steady weakening of the CCP at.Currently, around 30,000 people by the Communist Party say going on in China per day after they were informed by the "Nine Commentaries" on the crimes of the CCP.
In the past, the Chinese party leadership always turned to the concept of an external war, when the domestic political pressure was too great. A few weeks ago a Chinese military had threatened a nuclear first strike against the United States, located in the America should interfere, repatriation 'of Taiwan.
The following quotes from these speeches is one of the highest-ranking military in China should give the reader the opportunity to form their own opinion.
Loosen the lack of habitat
"Comrade Mao Zedong said that if we lead our allies to victory and make them benefit from it, they would support us. Consequently, as long as we can lead the Chinese people outside of China, the lack of habitat in China expectorant, the Chinese would support us. (...) Whether we can represent the Chinese people forever, depends on whether we can lead out of China successful. "(...)" After the uprising of June 4 was knocked down, we thought about it as we are in front of a China can preserve peaceful change and get the leadership of the Communist Party. We thought and thought, but we did not find any solution. But if we could get a good idea, China would inevitably peaceful change in the future, and we would all be condemned by history as a criminal. After careful consideration, we finally come to the following conclusion: only if we combine the developed strength of our nation into a force that penetrates to the outside with a punch - only if we lead our people to the outside ... our party will stand on solid ground and the Chinese People's Communist Party have to add (...). "
The economic development is preparing for war
"We have therefore recognized by the riots on June 4 (1989), that we need to link economic development with the preparation of war to lead the people out! Therefore, the national defense policy has made ​​a U-turn at this time and we have since our main focus on the "down link of peace and war." Our economic development is used exclusively for the preparation of war. In public, we will continue to emphasize economic development, but in reality, economic growth revolves around the war as its center. (...) We store everything you need for a war. Therefore, we do not shy away from the III. World War I to lead our people to the outside and to strengthen the leadership of the party. Either way we will never withdraw from the stage of history down. We would be more likely to share the whole world or even the entire globe life and death with us than step down from the stage of history! "
The environment is dirty
"(...) The first point is the habitat. This is the biggest focus in the revitalization of the Chinese race. (...) Furthermore, had the economic development of the past 20 years, adverse effects, and the climate is deteriorating rapidly. Our resources are scarce. The environment is severely polluted, especially soil, water and air. "(...)" In fact, however, is the development, to which we refer, China's grand rebirth, this reincarnation can certainly not be limited to our national territory, they must be extend over the whole world! "
"Anyone who has been in Western countries knows that their living space is much better than ours. They have forests along the highways, while we hardly have a few trees on our streets. Your sky is often blue with white clouds, while our sky is covered with dark mist. Their tap water is clean enough to drink, it can, while with us even the ground water is so polluted that it can not be drunk without filtering. They have little people in the streets, and two or three people can occupy a small house, on the other hand is crawling on our streets by people and several people share a room. "
Open fire on children, women and prisoners of war
"Comrades, today I am very excited because we commissioned, large-scale online survey, which was conducted by Sina Net, makes clear that our next generation is very hopeful, and that they will be the future of our party company . When people were asked, "Would you open fire on women, children and prisoners of war," affirmed over 80 percent, which exceeded our expectations. Although superficially it was the question of whether they would open fire on women, children and prisoners of war, as is the importance that shows itself in the fact but not limited to. Our main intention was to find out the attitude of the Chinese people against the war. If these future soldiers would dare to kill civilians, they will of course kill a hundred more soldiers. Therefore, we have found through this survey, the general attitude of our people towards the war. However, our true intention goes even further. The aim of this survey adopted by the Politburo is to find out: If China is expanding globally, and the population of our enemies is killed en masse, our people would be willing to accept it or not, they would support us or be against us "
The Chinese Century
"If the 19th Century the century of England and the 20th Century this was the USA, then the 21 Century the century of China. By recognizing this rule of history, we welcome the arrival of the Chinese Century, so it is the historical mission of our Party to get this! "
"What kind of fight we could follow in order to achieve the goal of the Chinese century? What was the reason for the defeat of Germany and Japan? First, they fought too many people at once. They did not follow the principle, they first isolate with each other and to defeat later one by one.Second, they were too much on the success and had no patience and perseverance. Third, they were too lenient when it came to beat the enemy with malice and destroy them. Whatever they had left, they were later undoing. Let us think about it. "
One nation, one party, one leader and an ideology
"At that time Hitler's Germany claimed that the Germanic race is the best on earth, and we can say that our much more superior than their. (...) The Chinese are superior to the Germans because they are the better race, so we have a longer history, more people and a larger country. (...) However, if you superficially compares the situation of today's China with that of Germany at that time, the story shows striking similarities. Both believe they are superior to other races. Both experienced a history of oppression by other countries and wanted vengeance. Both had the tradition to admire their state leadership, and the serious conviction that they had too little habitat.
Both held the flag for nationalism and socialism high and therefore called themselves "National Socialists" and admired "one nation, one party, one leader and an ideology. (...) "
The speech "The war comes to us" was first published in January 2003 under the title "A recent speech by a senior official of the People's Liberation Army" on websites such as, the authorship of the speech is not unique to clarify. On 11 October 2003, was again under the title "The war comes to us - Chi Haotian" published on websites such as Sometimes also called "China, do you still 10 peaceful years?".. Chi Haotian worked in his office as Secretary of Defense until 2004. His follow-up article "The war is not far from us, it is the midwife of the Chinese century," was released on and on April 23, 2005 January 15, 2005 Websites that published these speeches are news sites, their servers are located within China or which can be visited without censorship in China. DNE

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments always welcome!