Syria crisis: US Senate panel backs use of force
A Senate panel has approved the use of military force in Syria, in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack.
By 10-7, the Committee on Foreign Relations moved the measure to a full Senate vote, expected next week.
The proposal allows the use of force in Syria for 60 days with the possibility to extend it for 30 days. It prevents the use of US troops on the ground.
President Barack Obama is battling to build support at home and abroad for military action.
The Senate committee approved the bill on Wednesday after accepting an amendment by Republican Senator John McCain that advocated increasing support for rebel forces.
Despite the senators' vote, the bill's fate in the wider Senate is still unclear. And the US House of Representatives must also approve the measure.
French debate
So far, only 21 senators have said they support or are likely to support the resolution, according to a tally by ABC News.
Thirteen have said they oppose or are likely to oppose the resolution, while 66 votes are undecided or unknown.
However, those numbers are expected to shift as the language in the resolution changes, the White House and their congressional allies apply pressure, and lawmakers hear from their constituents.
Earlier in the day, France - whose government has strongly advocated intervention - held an extraordinary debate in the National Assembly, though MPs will not vote on the matter as the country's president can mobilise the military without their backing.
The government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is accused of using chemical weapons against civilians on several occasions during the 30-month conflict, most recently on a large scale in an attack on 21 August on the outskirts of Damascus.
The US has put the death toll from that incident at 1,429 - though other countries and organisations have given lower figures - and says all the evidence implicates government forces.
During a press conference in Stockholm, Sweden, on Wednesday, President Obama said: "My credibility is not on the line. The international community's credibility is on the line.
"America and Congress's credibility is on the line, because we give lip-service to the notion that these international norms are important."
No 'pin prick'
Mr Obama said he believed the US Congress would approve intervention, but stressed that as commander-in-chief, he had the right to act in his country's national interest regardless.
Two top Obama administration officials, Secretary of State John Kerry and Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel, meanwhile continued press the president's case for intervention, this time in front of a House of Representatives panel.
Mr Hagel said any US military strike on Syria would not be a mere "pin prick" but would reduce Syria's military capability.
He said he thought there was a "very high" likelihood that Mr Assad would use chemical weapons again if the US did not act.
The defence secretary estimated the cost of such a strike would be in the "tens of millions" of US dollars.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments always welcome!