Saturday, May 31, 2014

BeeMaid Honey "Not Mixed With Other Countries" ..Thats What They Say

Our Canadian honey is not only sweet and tasty but it's 100% Homegrown

You have probably heard at least one news story about the unknown origin of the food we eat every day. Well, it's a sweet comfort to know that all Bee Maid Honey is produced and packed in Canada! Our members are beekeepers spread out in four provinces, from Manitoba all the way to British Columbia. Located in main honey producing regions in Canada, Bee Maid Honey’s beekeepers harvest the honey and ship it to Bee Maid Honey plants for packing and distribution. Below is a map to show where Bee Maid Honey’s beekeepers are located across Canada.


[hmmmmm]

Friday, May 30, 2014

Obama Sides With The Filipinos

About Time!

Barack Obama in Manila (April 29, 2014): You're On Notice China!!!

Are you listening China?

China's long history of spying on business

China's long history of spying on business

  @CRrileyCNN May 20, 2014: 7:01 AM ET


pla hack
Allegations of Chinese espionage will not come as a surprise to some American companies.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

China has angrily denied new U.S. claims that it steals secrets from American companies but experts say espionage has long been part of the country's economic strategy.

The United States indicted five members of China's People's Liberation Army Monday, accusing them of hacking into American companies and pilfering closely-guarded trade secrets.
The charges -- rejected by Beijing as "purely ungrounded and with ulterior purpose" -- are a dramatic escalation in a squabble between the two countries over spying. But they will surprise few Americans working in sensitive industries.
While many countries engage in industrial espionage, China has long been among the most aggressive collectors of economic secrets -- both online and off, experts say.
"I can tell you they [China] are the most pervasive," Kevin Mandia, founder of cybersecurity firm Mandiant, told CNN. "The indictment is about taking intellectual property ... it's the theft of trade secrets, it's economic espionage."
China's use of economic espionage can be attributed in part to its drive to modernize the country in recent decades, a transformation spearheaded by leaders including Deng Xiaoping.
The illicit acquisition of technology has helped China accelerate the process, bypassing problems that would otherwise require years of research and development to resolve, analysts say.
The campaign has targeted industries from agriculture to aviation and computing. Monday's indictment indicated that recent targets included a solar panel manufacturer, aluminum and steel producers and a company that designs nuclear power plants.
In its quest for new technologies, China has been equally enthusiastic in securing trade secrets for use in both military and civilian applications. And the country's intelligence services don't always use highly trained spies to steal; some recruits are just sympathetic students and engineers.
The U.S. has brought spying charges against a handful of individuals accused of helping China since Congress approved the Economic Espionage Act in 2006.
In one of the most notable actions, Dongfan "Greg" Chung, a naturalized American citizen who worked on NASA's space shuttle program, was convicted in 2009 after investigators found hundreds of thousands of sensitive papers under his California home. Prosecutors said he gave some of the documents to Chinese officials, revealing details of military and space-related technology.
Chung, a former Boeing employee, was sentenced to more than 15 years in prison.
"Giving China advanced rocket technology is not in the United States' national interest," Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Staples said at the time. "There is a voracious appetite for U.S. technology in China."
An acquaintance of Chung's, Chi Mak, was sentenced to 24 years in prison for providing China with sensitive information on U.S. ships and submarines.
In another case that highlights the breadth of China's activities, six Chinese nationals were accused last year of trying to steal drought and pest-resistant corn seeds from fields across Iowa.
The seeds cost companies such as Dupont Pioneer, Monsanto (MON, Fortune 500)and LG Seeds years and tens of millions of dollars to develop.
The Obama administration is now seeking to draw a red line between military espionage and economic theft. Officials insist that U.S. spies do not share information with American companies.
"We do not do what those Chinese nationals were indicted for earlier today," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. "Period."
The issue has gained traction in the 15 months since Mandiant publicly identified a prolific group of computer hackers as members of the Chinese military.
See how FBI made global hacker bust
Mandiant traced the group to Shanghai -- with some operations taking place at the headquarters of Unit 61398, a secret division of China's military that was also named Monday by the Justice Department.
President Obama has raised the issue with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. But his arguments have carried less weight following revelations by Edward Snowden that U.S. agencies were attempting to monitor Chinese telecommunications company Huawei.
Chinese officials were quick to levy charges of hypocrisy against the U.S.
"It is widely known that the U.S. has for a long time been using its advanced technology and infrastructure to perpetrate large-scale theft of secrets and eavesdropping against foreign political leaders, enterprises and individuals," China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement Tuesday. To top of page

U.S., China differences over Asia territorial disputes on sharp display

U.S., China differences over Asia territorial disputes on sharp display

By Jim Sciutto, CNN
updated 8:40 PM EDT, Thu May 15, 2014
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Fang Fenghui, expressed opposing views of who is to blame for the broadening tensions.
Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Fang Fenghui, expressed opposing views of who is to blame for the broadening tensions.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Territorial disputes over islands in Asia are boiling over into violence
  • Key U.S., Chinese military leaders hold frank private talks
  • One issue involves standoff between China and Vietnam
  • The U.S. encourages all sides to resolve their disputes diplomatically
(CNN) -- The United States and China put on sharp display Thursday their continuing differences over territorial disputes in the South and East China Seas, disputes that are now boiling over into violence.
In a joint news conference at the Pentagon, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey and his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Fang Fenghui, described their private discussions as "refreshingly frank" and "constructive" before expressing opposing views of who is to blame for the broadening tensions.
China and Vietnam are currently locked in a standoff after China installed an oil rig on an island in the Paracel chain (jointly claimed by the two countries), sparking protests in Vietnam, including violent attacks on Chinese and ethnic Chinese residents.
Fang said, "We do not make trouble but we are not afraid of trouble," adding "in matters of territory, our attitude is firm. We won't give an inch."
Anti-China riots in Vietnam
China looms large over Obama trip
Was China target of U.S.-Philippines pact?
Dempsey countered, "We have to acknowledge there are territorial disputes," including "what exactly is the status quo and who is seeking to change it."
It was a veiled reference to Washington's position that Beijing is attempting to change the status quo by more aggressively seeking to establish control over numerous island chains simultaneously claimed by China and several South East Asia nations.
In addition to the current standoff between China and Vietnam, China and Japan both claim sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands, while China and the Philippines are competing for control over several small land formations, such as the Scarborough Shoal.
On his recent trip to Asia, President Barack Obama announced a new military base access agreement with the Philippines.
The United States says it takes no position on sovereignty but encourages all sides to resolve the disputes through diplomacy.
In response to China's installation of the oil rig in the Paracel Islands, the State Department released a statement this week saying, "This unilateral action appears to be part of a broader pattern of Chinese behavior to advance its claims over disputed territory in a manner that undermines peace and stability in the region."
Despite the differences that exist over these issues, Dempsey announced that China would participate in the bi-annual Rim of Pacific naval exercise that takes place in Hawaii.
Dempsey also announced a secure video conference link between him and Fang will be established later this year.

The Chinese Penchant:"Cruelty As Entertainment"

The Chinese Penchant:"Cruelty As Entertainment"

 55 sentenced before 7,000 onlookers at terror 'show trial' in Chinese stadium

By Tim Hume 
updated 9:30 AM EDT, Thu May 29, 2014
Dozens of terror suspects are found guilty before 7000 spectators at a stadium in China's Xinjiang Province.
Dozens of terror suspects are found guilty before 7000 spectators at a stadium in China's Xinjiang Province.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • 55 people have been sentenced on terror charges in a stadium "show trial" in China
  • Three were sentenced to death in the stadium in Xinjiang, before 7,000 spectators
  • The trial is part of a response to a string of terror attacks linked to the Uyghur minority
  • Amnesty International has slammed the stadium trial as "deplorable"
Beijing (CNN) -- A Chinese court sentenced 55 people on terror charges before thousands of onlookers in a stadium in Xinjiang Province Wednesday, as part of a hardline response to a string of deadly attacks across the country.
The trial was held in a stadium in Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture in the restive western province of Xinjiang, before about 7,000 spectators, according to reports.
The accused were found guilty by the Higher People's Court of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of charges including intentional homicide, separatism, and organizing, leading and participating in terrorist activities.
Three of the accused were sentenced to death, state media reported, for the murder "with extreme cruelty" of a family of four in Yining City, using blades and axes, on April 20. The court named one of those sentenced to death over the attack, whose victims included a three-year-old girl, as Abulimiti Abdullah, state media reported.
Pictures from the sentencing showed the accused held on the back of pick-up trucks, dressed in orange jumpsuits and surrounded by security forces. A banner across the back of the stadium read: "Yili Prefecture Public Judgment, Public Seizure, Public Arrest General Assembly."
Li Minghui, vice-secretary of the prefectural Communist Party committee, vowed to strike hard against terrorists.
"We have the confidence, resolution and capability to take a firm stance, form an iron hand and hit hard and fast like a thunder to vanquish the enemy's arrogant audacity," he was reported as saying.
"We will achieve the final victory of this war of the people to stop terrorism and maintain stability."
'Deplorable' show trial
Terror suspects, in orange jumpsuits, held by security forces.
Terror suspects, in orange jumpsuits, held by security forces.
Human rights organization Amnesty International called the proceedings a show trial, labeling it "deplorable" and saying it was no way to address public security concerns in the wake of the violence that has spread from the province. Most of those sentenced were believed to be Uyghurs, it said in a statement.
"Those responsible for the recent violent attacks have shown a callous disregard for human life and must be held to account. But speedy show trials will not deliver justice for the victims," said William Nee, Amnesty's China researcher.
"Hastily sentencing people after unfair trials will only exacerbate tensions."
He said Chinese authorities appeared "more concerned with courting public opinion than justice."
"It is highly doubtful the accused received fair trials," he said, adding that those sentenced were believed to be at risk of torture in detention.
Spate of terror
The trial follows a spate of terror attacks in public spaces across China linked to Xinjiang's Uyghur population, a mainly Turkic-speaking Muslim minority.
The latest bout began when a jeep plowed into crowds in Beijing's Tiananmen Square in October, killing five and injuring at least 40, and have intensified in recent months.
Twenty-nine people were killed and 130 injured when men armed with long knives stormed a train station in Kunming in March. The following month an attack on a train station in Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital, left three dead, including the attackers, while an attack on an Urumqi market earlier this month killed at least 39.
In response, police in Xinjiang launched a crackdown on extremist groups in the province, arresting 200 suspects and seizing hundreds of explosive devices, Chinese state media reported this week. The state's anti-terrorist force has been beefed up in Xinjiang, and security tightened around the country.
Some Uyghurs have expressed resentment towards China's Han majority in recent years over what they say is harsh treatment from Chinese security forces and Han people taking the lion's share of economic opportunities in Xinjiang.
Amnesty said Uyghurs face widespread discrimination, including in employment, housing and educational opportunities, as well as curtailed religious freedom and political marginalization.
[Ethnic Cleansing] at its worst

Living kidneys printed out in China

Sickness/Diabolical!

Sick! China’s First 3D Bio Printer, Transplants Anyone?

Sick! China’s First 3D Bio Printer

Printers are quickly becoming standard apparatus in biomedical engineering labs across the globe. To keep up with this trend, researchers at the Hangzhou University of Electronic Science and Technology have created China’s first domestically produced bioprinter.
The Hangzhou team, led by Xu Ming-En, built their bioprinter to operate using consecutive layers of hydrogel that can be embedded with cells. As this process happens over and over, a biomaterial is built. According to the Hangzhou team, their new printer is highly accurate, creates materials with a low cell damage rate, and has two nozzles for injecting materials at both high and low temperatures.


Fetuses!!!

In recent tests, Xu has created objects like a thumb sized ear in roughly fifty minutes, not counting the time spent “curing” the print in a cross-linking agent. While printing grotesques like miniature ears is proof that the process works, Xu says that his printer is also capable of printing more complex tissues, such as liver lobules. In fact, Xu explains, “The process takes around forty minutes to an hour".For the time being, Xu’s bioprinter will be used to build muscle fiber and blood vessels, while also perfecting their method for building cartilage-based features, like ears and noses. As his printer becomes more sophisticated, Xu hopes to create more complex organs, like livers and kidneys.
If either Xu or any of his contemporaries could develop a sufficiently sophisticated bio printer, the future of organ transplants could be revolutionized. Organs, which today must be carefully matched between donor and recipient,could be built specifically for an individual.

Top Chinese Transplant Official Says There’s No Plan to Stop Using Prisoner Organs

Top Chinese Transplant Official Says There’s No Plan to Stop Using Prisoner Organs


Wang Haibo, an unofficial spokesperson on China’s organ transplant policies, recently told a well-known German journalist that the Chinese regime had no intention of announcing a schedule for weaning itself off the use of organs from executed prisoners.
“The question is, ‘When can China solve the problem of the shortage of donor organs?’ I wish we could end it tomorrow. But it requires a process,” he said in a radio program on ARD, a major German public broadcast network.
“Many things are beyond our control,” he added. “Therefore, we can not announce any time schedule.”
The journalist, Ruth Kirchner, said that Wang agreed to the interview “after long hesitation, because organ donation connected to the death penalty is a sensitive issue in China.”
Wang, director of the China Organ Transplant Response System Research Center at the Ministry of Health, would not say how many organs come from executed prisoners. Some outside groups suggest that there are 4,000 executions per year, though only a portion of those would yield organs viable for transplant.
One of the major disputes that international Western medical groups have with the Chinese authorities is its practice of harvesting the organs from executed prisoners.
In the way this is generally meant by the Chinese authorities, the term refers to organs from criminals who are sentenced to death and have their organs extracted after they are executed given that, at least in theory, they and their families have signed a consent waiver. Families are also entitled to compensation for agreeing to the organ extraction.
Both The Transplantation Society and the World Health Organization forbid the use of organs from executed prisoners, because they say that there can be no true consent from a prisoner on death row.
Many analysts also point to a more sinister source of prisoner organs: those that come from executed prisoners of conscience, who are not formally sentenced to death through the courts for any crime, but who are held in arbitrary detention, blood-tested, and killed for their organs as required.
Reports emerged in 2006 and 2007 of the widespread harvesting of practitioners of Falun Gong, a spiritual discipline heavily persecuted by the Chinese regime. The extent to which the practice persists to this day is unknown, due to the lack of transparency in Chinese data and the secrecy of the persecution.
Wang’s remarks are the second set of high-profile comments from a top Chinese transplant official that openly sets forth what appears to be a new official public stance on the use of prisoner organs.

These new remarks have been a break from what was the previously accepted, and stated, official view. For the last six years, and in particular the last two, the Chinese had promised to move to a system of purely voluntary donation, and vowed repeatedly that it would phase out the use of prisoner organs.
In an interview with the World Health Organization in late 2012, Wang himself affirmed this shift in policy by China. “While we cannot deny the executed prisoner’s right to donate organs, an organ transplantation system relying on death-row prisoners’ organs is not ethical or sustainable,” he said. “Now there is consensus among China’s transplant community that the new system will relinquish the reliance on organs from executed convicts.”
That has evidently changed, to the consternation of international transplant officials who for years practiced quiet diplomacy with China in an effort to bring it around.
A letter by two major international medical organizations, including The Transplantation Society, said that the Chinese practice of taking organs from executed prisoners was “scorned by the international community.”

Ending Organ Pillaging / Trafficking in China

Ending Organ Pillaging / Trafficking in China

Text of David Kilgour's speech to the Knesset of Israel

(L-R): Shiping (Sarah) Lu, Chinese labor camp survivor;  Roy Bar-Ilan, Manager, Falun Dafa Israeli Information Center; Member of Parliament Moshe Feiglin, Deputy Speaker of Israeli Parliament; David Kilgour; Ethan Gutmann, investigative journalist and author of "Losing the New China." (Courtesy of David Kilgour)

17 February, 2014
Honourable members of the Knesset,
Permit me to thank you for the welcome given to the recent delegation from Canada.  The visit and our prime minister’s address to the Knesset were widely reported across our country.
Permit me to repeat four excerpts from the speech:
“Canada supports Israel fundamentally because it is right to do so … The special friendship between Canada and Israel is rooted in shared values … Israel is the only country in the Middle East which has long anchored itself in the ideals of freedom, democracy and the rule of law … when (universal values) are threatened anywhere, they are threatened everywhere.”
When human dignity is denied in a major way in China, it can threaten us all, so I hope the legislators and peoples in both our countries will do what is correct without misplaced fear.
All of us in the international coalition to end organ pillaging/trafficking in China can be pleased that you’re holding this important hearing.
Time is urgent; I am certain that men and women convicted of nothing are currently being killed in China so that their vital organs can be sold.

Falun Gong

The principal victim community, Falun Gong (or Falun Dafa), uses a set of gentle exercises for the body. For the mind, its core principles are “truthfulness, compassion and forbearance”, which echo those of many spiritual faiths.
Falun Gong was introduced to the general public in China only in 1992; it grew within seven years to 70-100 million practitioners by the government’s own estimate. Its belief system differs sharply from the atheism/materialism of the Communist Party. 
In July, 1999, then Party leader Jiang Zemin launched a violent campaign, the  stated purpose of which was to “eradicate” Falun Gong.
A U.S. government report concluded several years ago that at least half of the inmates in the vast network of forced labour camps across China—one estimate is about 350 camps—are Falun Gong.  Former detainees interviewed by David Matas and myself in various locations outside China, consistently indicated that Falun Gong were both the largest group in the camps and were singled out for systematic torture and abuse.
Tens of millions of peaceful/non-political Falun Gong from all regions and walks of life have been in effect deemed subhuman by the Beijing government. The party-state policy is that they can accordingly be killed on demand without any recourse.

Independent Report

In May 2006 the Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong in China (CIPFG) asked David Matas and me to investigate the claims of organ pillaging/trafficking from living Falun Gong practitioners. We released two reports and one book and have continued to investigate this issue. (Our revised report is available in 18 languages, including Hebrew, from www.david-kilgour.com). We concluded that for 41,500 transplants done in the years 2000-2005 alone in China, the only plausible explanation for sourcing was Falun Gong.
Our main conclusion reads that there “continues today to be large-scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners (…) Their vital organs, including kidneys, livers, corneas and hearts, were seized involuntarily for sale at high prices, sometimes to foreigners, who normally face long waits for voluntary donations of such organs in their home countries.”

Evidence of Pillaging/Trafficking

Permit me to mention only a small fraction of the evidence that led us to our conclusion:
  • Investigators made many calls to hospitals, detention centres and other facilities across China claiming to be relatives of patients needing transplants and asking if they had organs of Falun Gong for sale. We obtained on tape and then transcribed and translated admissions that a number of facilities trafficking in Falun Gong organs gave us.
  • Falun Gong prisoners who later got out of China testified that they were systematically blood-tested and organ-examined while in camps across the country. This could not have been for their health, since they were regularly tortured, but it is necessary for organ transplants and for building a bank of live ”donors”.
  • In a few cases, family members of Falun Gong practitioners were able to see mutilated corpses of their loved ones between death and cremation. Organs had been removed.
  • We interviewed the ex-wife of a surgeon from Sujiatun in Shenyang City, Liaoning. He told her that he had removed corneas from 2,000 Falun Gong prisoners between 2001 and 2003. He made it clear to her that none of these sources survived the experience because different surgeons removed other organs and their bodies were then burned.

International Responses

European Parliament
In 2006, the European Parliament conducted a hearing and adopted a resolution condemning the detention/torture of Falun Gong practitioners and expressing concern over reports of organ harvesting. At recent hearings, Tunne Kelam on the Foreign Affairs Committee noted, ”if we don’t take knowledge seriously about this practice, we have become morally and politically co-responsible for what’s going on.”  
United States
Since June 2011, the online U.S. non-immigration visa application (Form DS-160) asks applicants if they have been involved in transplant abuse.
In July 2013, Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) and Rep. Robert Andrews (D-N.J.) introduced Resolution 281 in the Committee on Foreign Affairs which calls on China to stop immediately organ trafficking from its prisoners. It adds, “persistent and credible reports of systematic, state-sanctioned organ harvesting from non-consenting prisoners of conscience” is the basis for concern, and then provides a summary of the evidence that links most organ trafficking with a single-minded campaign to persecute and “eradicate” the practice of Falun Gong.
Israel
The Knesset admirably passed legislation banning the sale and brokerage of organs. The law also ended funding through the health insurance system of transplants in China for Israeli nationals. Transplant surgeon Jay Lavee in his contribution to the book, State Organs, explains your law as a reaction to transplant abuse in China. Israel now leads the world campaign to end trafficking.
Ireland
In Ireland this past July, the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade conducted a hearing and unanimously passed a motion which called on the Irish Government to support the UN and Council of Europe initiatives to oppose forced organ harvesting in China.
Australia
In the parliament of New South Wales, legislation was proposed in 2013 against organ trafficking, which would bar any resident of the state from buying a trafficked organ anywhere. Last March, the Australian Senate unanimously passed a motion urging the government to oppose organ harvesting in China. The motion also calls on the government to follow the example of the United States in implementing a new visa requirement.
United Kingdom
The NHS blood and transplant data, I’m told, confirm that some UK nationals still travel to China for organ transplants and subsequently receive aftercare from the NHS. For UK and other foreigners who go to China as organ tourists, one hopes that they do not understand the horror inflicted on the ”donors”.
NGOs
Various medical organizations have issued statements urging measures to stop organ pillaging. For example, in 2006 the World Medical Association (WMA) demanded that China stop using prisoners as organ donors. Recently the policy of the WMA includes a paragraph that organ donation from prisoners is not acceptable in countries where the death penalty is practised.
I should single out for praise Dr Jay Lavee and Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH), who have been effective in a number of nations.

Observation

Matas and I engaged in extensive interviews of organ recipients and family members. The surgery is conducted in almost total secrecy. Recipients and their support networks are not told the identity of the donors; nor are they shown written consent from donors. The identities of the operating surgeon and support staff are often not disclosed, despite requests for information.
One organ recipient told us that a military doctor, Major Tan, in Shanghai tested the compatibility of seven sets of kidneys before a successful match was found. The doctor would leave the hospital in army uniform and return later with containers holding kidneys.
Recommendations
The international coalition to end organ pillaging will not rest until this inhuman commerce ends in China completely. Until the growing loss of face, often achieved through ‘naming and shaming’ the party-state, proves effective, other countries and their legislators have a responsibility to end complicity with this inhuman abuse by our own nationals.  
Other governments should follow Israel by enacting measures to criminalize the purchase of trafficked organs at home or abroad. They could also require reporting of ‘organ tourism’, ban entry of those involved in trafficking organs, and prohibit their pharmaceutical companies from doing transplant field tests and clinical trials in China.
Responsible business people should reduce trade and investment in China until its government ceases organ trafficking. As Beijing has also directed all of its embassies to spread hatred and false information against Falun Gong, how can anyone continue to do business as usual? In so doing, they are financing and nurturing a party-state, which pillages organs from its citizens for commercial purposes. 
Standing for human dignity here would in all likelihood not cost a country trade or other business with China. Consider Norway, the Czech Republic and Canada. When Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2010, the government of Norway received considerable pressure from the embassy of China in Oslo, yet the award was made and nothing appears to have resulted to harm the economy of Norway.
Similar threats were made to the late Vaclev Havel when he invited the Dalai Lama to Prague, but His Holiness came and nothing harmful resulted. Prime Minister Harper received a lot of threats from Beijing when he said he would not let the “almighty dollar” determine his government’s China policy. Bombardier announced its biggest deal ever in China at about the same time that the threats were coming from China’s party -state. I think a number of party bosses respect democratic nation leaders who stand for human dignity.
Many of us and beyond China ought to be having a greater impact on this grave matter, not only because it is necessary to protect thousands of innocent people from being killed, but also because it is good for China and the international community as a whole. We all want a China that enjoys the rule of law, dignity for all and democratic governance.
Thank you.