Sunday, August 2, 2020

New details about Chinese murderer’s offshore dealings just one secret revealed in Panama Papers

Gu Kailai, the wife of disgraced politician Bo Xilai, stands trial for the 2011 murder of British business associate Neil Heywood, who threatened to expose her and her husband's offshore tax havens. She eventually confessed to poisoning Heywood in a hotel room.
Gu Kailai, the wife of disgraced politician Bo Xilai, stands trial for the 2011 murder of British business associate Neil Heywood, who threatened to expose her and her husband's offshore tax havens. She eventually confessed to poisoning Heywood in a hotel room.


New details about Chinese 

murderer’s offshore 

dealings just one secret 

revealed in Panama 

Papers


Thu., April 7, 2016


For months, Gu Kailai worried about a secret that threatened to upend her comfortable life and stop her husband’s climb to the top rungs of China’s political leadership. So she took action.

In a hotel room in the southern Chinese megacity of Chongqing, she mixed tea and rat poison in a small container as Neil Heywood, a British business associate, lay drunk and dazed on the hotel bed.

Then she dripped the mixture into Heywood’s mouth.

Hotel staff found his body two days later.

Gu eventually confessed to the 2011 crime. She had been driven to murder, she said, by Heywood’s threats to expose the millions of dollars in real estate she held in an offshore account, kept secret for more than a year.

If Heywood revealed that she had used a company in the British Virgin Islands to hide her ownership in a villa in the south of France, she figured, the scandal would jeopardize the accession of her husband, Bo Xilai, to the Politburo Standing Committee, a body of fewer than 10 men that stands at the apex of political power in China.

Just over two weeks after the murder — in a previously unknown postscript — the ownership structure of Gu’s offshore company suddenly changed. Her shares in the company were transferred to another business associate, perhaps to further obscure her ties to the company or to make it easier for the associate to act swiftly as events unfolded, a trove of secret records shows.

In the end, nothing could hide Gu’s secrets. Her pursuit of offshore anonymity ended in death for Heywood and prison for her and her husband — and added more fuel to long-standing concerns about how China’s elite use tax havens to conceal their wealth.

The leaked documents that provide fresh details about Gu’s overseas dealings also reveal new information about the offshore holdings of the families of other powerful Chinese.

The cache of documents was obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung and other media partners. The records, more than 11 million documents, reveal the inner workings of Mossack Fonseca, a Panamanian law firm that specializes in building corporate structures that can be used to conceal assets.

Among the law firm’s Chinese customers is Deng Jiagui, the brother-in-law of China’s “chairman of everything” — president, Communist Party chief and military chief — Xi Jinping, who has made anti-corruption a hallmark of his rule. Deng Jiagui acquired one offshore firm via Mossack Fonseca in 2004 and two more in 2009. It is unclear what the companies were used for and all three were dormant when Xi became Communist Party chief in 2012.

The daughter of Li Peng, the former premier best known internationally for overseeing the military crackdown on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, and her husband own Cofic Investments, a British Virgin Islands company incorporated in 1994. In internal emails, Li Xiaolin’s lawyers say the company’s funds came from helping facilitate the export of industrial equipment from Europe to China.

Ownership was cloaked for years by the use of so-called bearer shares, which are registered without names. They have long been considered a vehicle for money laundering and other wrongdoing, and have been gradually disappearing worldwide as jurisdictions toughen regulations to stop the flow of dirty money.

This generation of the Red nobility seems to have learned about the offshore world at a young age. The granddaughter of Jia Qinglin, a Standing Committee member until 2012, has offshore assets. Jasmine Li Zidan became the owner of an offshore company called Harvest Sun Trading Ltd. in 2010 — when she was a freshman at Stanford University.

Jasmine Li has built a surprisingly large business for someone still in her 20s: her two BVI shell entities were used to set up two companies in Beijing with total registered capital of $300,000. Since the BVI companies owned Li’s shares in the Beijing companies, the family name was kept off the public registration documents.

The other current and former Standing Committee members with relatives connected to offshore dealings are:

Zhang Gaoli, a current Standing Committee member, has a son-in-law named Lee Shing Put, who was a shareholder of three companies incorporated in the BVIs.

Liu Yunshan, a current Politburo member, has a daughter-in-law named Jia Liqing who was the director and shareholder of Ultra Time Investments Ltd., a company incorporated in the BVI in 2009.

Zeng Qinghong, who was vice-president of China from 2002 to 2007, has a brother named Zeng Qinghuai, who was the director of a company, China Cultural Exchange Association Ltd., that was incorporated in Niue and then re-domiciled in 2006 in Samoa.

Hu Dehua, the son of the late Hu Yaobang, who served as head of the Chinese Communist Party from 1982 to 1987, was shareholder, director and beneficial owner of a company incorporated in the BVI in 2003. Hu Dehua registered the company using his home address, the courtyard home where his father lived while party chief.

As well as the politically connected princelings, Mossack Fonseca’s Chinese customers include the super wealthy such as Shen Guojun, who founded the Chinese shopping mall chain Intime. Shen was a shareholder, with the kung-fu star Jackie Chan and others, of a company called Dragon Stream Ltd. that had been incorporated in the BVI in 2008.

Jasmine Li, daughter of Li Peng (pictured), has built a surprisingly large business for someone still in her twenties, including two British Virgin Islands shell entities.

Another billionaire, Kelly Zong Fuli, the daughter of billionaire soft drink magnate Zong Qinghou, acquired a BVI shelf company called Purple Mystery Investments with help from Mossack Fonseca in February 2015. Correspondence shows the purpose of the company was “investment in China.”

Shen Guojun, Jackie Chan and Kelly Zong Fuli did not respond to ICIJ’s requests for comment.

An analysis of the leaked records by ICIJ shows that by the end of 2015, Mossack Fonseca was collecting fees for more than 16,300 offshore companies incorporated through offices in Hong Kong and China. Those companies represented 29 per cent of Mossack Fonseca’s active companies worldwide and made greater China the law firm’s single leading market. Its busiest office globally is Hong Kong.

International rules on money laundering require middlemen like Mossack Fonseca to scrutinize government officials and their families to make sure their money was not accumulated through graft. Some clients, such as Shi Youzhen, the wife of Zong Qinghou, the soft drinks magnate, were subject to “enhanced due diligence,” including queries about the assets held by her offshore companies.

An examination of the files shows the firm signed up other Chinese clients without determining if they had family ties to top political figures.

The documents show, for example, that no one at Mossack Fonseca acknowledged or identified Deng Jiagui as Xi Jinping’s brother-in-law when it helped Deng incorporate offshore companies.

Mossack Fonseca also appears for years to have not acknowledged or not realized the family ties of Li Xiaolin, former Chinese Premier Li Peng’s only daughter.

Li Xiaolin did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In a letter to ICIJ, Mossack Fonseca said the firm has “duly established policies and procedures” to identify and handle cases involving politicians or people associated with them. It said the company considers those kinds of cases to be “high risk” and conducts more intense checks and periodic follow ups. “We conduct thorough due diligence on all new and prospective clients that often exceeds in stringency the existing rules and standards to which we and others are bound.”

Business people in China often attempt to curry favour with top leaders by helping their spouses, children, grandchildren and other close family relatives. The nature of these secretive ties was laid bare during the trials of Gu Kailai and her husband Bo Xilai, who depended heavily on a plastics tycoon called Xu Ming. As Bo said during his corruption trial in August 2013: “Xu Ming has provided a vast amount of financial assistance to my family. . . I have helped him achieve ‘rapid advances,’ and he helped me to look after my son.”

Gu Kailai and her husband, Bo, had all the ingredients of a Chinese power couple.

Gu, the daughter of a People’s Liberation Army general, worked as a butcher’s assistant during the Cultural Revolution but became a successful lawyer.

Bo, the son of one of the powerful “Eight Elders” of the Communist Party, ran the sprawling metropolis of Chongqing and, by 2011, was a leading candidate for the Politburo Standing Committee and the nation’s next domestic security czar.

As her husband’s star rose, Gu acquired a six-bedroom villa in Cannes, France. The home was bought in 2001 with funds from Xu Ming. Xu got around China’s strict capital controls by faking the purchase of a steel workshop in order to transfer the $3.2 million (U.S.) offshore.

Bo Xilai's six-bedroom Villa Fontaine Saint Georges in Cannes.

The company selling the nonexistent steel workshop took a small cut and then transferred the rest to Russell Properties S.A., a BVI company secretly co-owned by Gu and a business associate, French architect Patrick Henri Devillers. Russell Properties S.A. transferred money to a company in France that purchased and managed the villa.

Nothing on paper linked Russell Properties to Gu or her powerful husband.

Gu used the Villa Fontaine St. Georges as an investment, hoping it would generate rental income. She testified that she hid her ownership because she wanted to “minimize” her tax. And, she said, “I did not want others to know I had overseas assets.”

She asked Heywood, a family friend who exuded equal parts flash and mystery, to manage the villa. He was known to drive around Beijing in a Jaguar with the numerals “007” on the licence plate. The Guardian reported that he referred to Gu as an unforgiving “empress.”

Heywood became part of a cottage industry of operatives who serve as fronts for wealthy Chinese. These proxies, known in China as “white gloves,” often hold the real owners’ stakes in real estate and other investments. It has become a lucrative business in China.

For Heywood, it would also turn out to be deadly.

Gu had promised Heywood a cut of a real-estate deal in Chongqing but Heywood believed he wasn’t getting his fair share. In early 2011, Gu testified, Heywood approached her son, Bo Guagua, to press him to ask his family for more money. Heywood threatened to reveal Gu’s ownership of the villa, Gu claimed.

Gu and Heywood met on Nov. 13, 2011, in the Lucky Holiday Hotel in Chongqing to discuss the dispute, according to reports of her trial. They had dinner then went to his room for drinks. He drank half a bottle of Royal Salute whiskey and vomited before being dragged to his bed by Bo family assistant Zhang Xiaojun. Heywood asked Gu for water. She mixed rat poison and tea in a soy sauce container and fed it to him in sips. Gu waited until she couldn’t feel Heywood’s pulse, then went to her room in the hotel.

Little more than two weeks later, the leaked files show, Mossack Fonseca helped transfer ownership shares of Russell Properties S.A. to Patrick Henri Devillers, the French architect who had assisted Gu in setting up the company in 2000.

Devillers used the address of Gu’s former law partner in Beijing on the transfer paperwork. According to court documents, Russell Properties had initially been held 50/50 by Gu and Devillers via two Channel Islands proxies.

It’s not clear why the transfer was made so soon after the crime or why Gu’s share was transferred to Devillers. It seems strange that Devillers would choose to put the company in his name and use Gu’s former business address on the paperwork, essentially leaving his and her fingerprints on the company. The result was that Devillers was able to establish contact with Mossack Fonseca, giving him greater immediate control of the company.

The city of Chongquing, where Gu Kailai had promised Neil Heywood a cut of a real-estate deal, and where she eventually murdered him.

By early 2012, Devillers was often in the news for his links to Gu’s murder trial and Bo Xilai’s corruption scandal. Yet, according to the leaked files, for several months in early 2012, Mossack Fonseca appeared to remain oblivious to the case. During this time, Devillers emailed Mossack Fonseca to request that they allow him to transfer Russell Properties to an offshore agent called Morgan & Morgan Trust.

On June 7, 2012, BVI regulators launched an investigation into Russell Properties S.A., requesting information from Mossack Fonseca. Four days later, a Mossack Fonseca compliance officer alerted her colleagues in an email that Devillers appeared to be linked to an investigation in China.

Mossack Fonseca emailed Devillers directly, sending him increasingly anxious notes that included links to news stories about the scandal and his alleged role in it. “The articles mentioned a person with your name and nationality,” the law firm wrote. “Please advise us whether the person in question and you are the same person.” He appears not to have replied.

In its response to the British Virgin Islands authority, the law firm stated that a man named Patrick Henri Devillers was the sole shareholder and director of Russell Properties, and “our last contact regarding this company.” It made no mention of the company’s apparent links to the scandal unfolding in China, though it promised to dig deeper and provide more information later.

Devillers now lives in Cambodia. He testified in the trials of Gu and Bo but was never charged with any crime. He did not answer ICIJ’s repeated requests for comment.

Bo is serving a life sentence for bribery, embezzlement and abuse of power, although he says that someday he will be vindicated. Gu was sentenced to death for murdering Heywood. In December 2015, Chinese authorities reduced her punishment to life in prison.

The court judgment against Bo ordered the villa be confiscated by the Chinese government. Chinese state media reported in 2014 that it was up for sale.

Suggested price: $8.5 million.

Struggling Vancouver Chinese restaurant owner claims Uber Eats owes him $20,000

Struggling Vancouver Chinese restaurant owner claims Uber Eats owes him $20,000

(Courtesy Facebook/sipbowllamian)
SUMMARY

Shibo Yu, one owner of Sip Bowl La Mian in Kerrisdale, says he's been trying since April to get $20,000 from Uber Eats

Yu says the amount owed by the third-party take out and delivery app would go a long way to helping him make ends meeet

VANCOUVER (NEWS 1130) — A Vancouver restaurant owner whose business increasingly relies on takeout amid the COVID-19 pandemic says he is owed about $20,000 from Uber Eats.

Shibo Yu, one of the owners of Sip Bowl La Mian in Kerrisdale, says he’s been trying since April to get his money — and get answers.

“I’m just hitting a wall, and I don’t see a formal explanation. Every time I call them — seriously they have a customer service problem — because their customer service rep can not solve anything. Any problem they have to escalate to a team and the team is supposed to be getting back to you and start solving the problem. They haven’t” he says.

“I’m just fed up because now it’s accumulated to like $20,000 and I’m not getting any answers as to why I’m not getting paid.”

Yu signed up with the their-party delivery service in November 2019 but he and his business partner didn’t fully realize the problem until April when revenue went down and takeout business went up.

“At the beginning of the pandemic I would say I saw a probably 50 per cent increase in takeout orders through these online apps, there’s definitely more than before,” Yu says.

Now, although dining in is allowed, he still relies on the money generated through delivery apps.

“If I stop the Uber service that means probably my business is going to decrease 10 or 15 per cent in total sales. I don’t want to do that, it’s not customers’ fault, I don’t want to punish the customers,” he explains.

“We’re struggling, we’re only at like maybe 50 per cent capacity. I’m not a big restaurant, I’m really small, I only have six tables in my restaurant and $20,000 means I could pay my staff, I could pay my suppliers. I’m really struggling right now and it means more money from my own pocket to fill those holes.”

Yu says he has inquired about his payment at least a dozen times. Earlier this week someone told him he would see a payment, but that didn’t happen.

So he took to social media.

“I don’t know what else I can do, that’s why I wrote that post, I just hoped to get their attention,” he says.

“It’s really devastating for my restaurant, I have people working for me, I have a restaurant to run, I need the money. I need the money to keep my business running and they don’t seem to understand that this is important for their customer. I’m really sad.”

NEWS 1130 has reached out to Uber Eats for comment.

What would a U.S. ban on Chinese-owned app TikTok mean?

What would a U.S. ban on Chinese-owned app TikTok mean?

U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to ban TikTok comes as Microsoft Corp. is reportedly in advanced talks to buy the popular Chinese video app. If banned, the app would be pulled from the app store of Apple and Google and not function unless used by a virtual private network, experts say. (Florence Lo/Reuters)

U.S. President Donald Trump says he wants to take action to ban TikTok, a popular Chinese-owned video app that has been a source of national security and censorship concerns.

The threat comes as Microsoft Corp. is in advanced talks to buy the Chinese app, owned by ByteDance Ltd., according to a person familiar with the discussions who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity to the negotiations. Microsoft declined to comment.

It's not clear whether Trump would accept a divestment as a concession.

But there have been reports of U.S. tech giants and financial firms being interested in buying or investing in TikTok as the Trump administration sets its sights on the app.

Questions and answers about what's at stake:

What's TikTok?

ByteDance launched TikTok in 2017 before buying Musical.ly — a video service popular with teens in Canada, the U.S. and Europe — and combined the two. A twin service, Douyin, is available for Chinese users.

TikTok's fun, goofy videos and ease of use have made it immensely popular, and U.S. tech giants like Facebook and Snapchat see it as a competitive threat.

It has said it has tens of millions of users in the U.S. and hundreds of millions globally. But TikTok has also been a way that millions of people have built careers and made a living.

ByteDance launched TikTok in 2017 before buying Musical.ly — a video service popular with teens in Canada, the U.S. and Europe — and combined the two. A twin service, Douyin, is available for Chinese users. (Thomas Suen/Reuters)

What would the ban look like?

The app would be pulled from the app store of Apple and Google and not function unless used by a virtual private network, experts say.

How likely is the ban?

Experts believe that while the ban may seem legitimate, it likely won't come to that, given the pressure by ByteDance to sell its stake and any control of TikTok to a U.S. company or completely spin off, said Ben Bajarin of Creative Strategies, an industry analysis and market research firm based in San Jose, Calif.

"I think a total spinoff or U.S. tech firm acquisition is the likely scenario here so it can keep operating," he said.

TikTok's fun, goofy videos and ease of use have made it immensely popular, and U.S. tech giants like Facebook and Snapchat see it as a competitive threat. (AFP via Getty Images)

What does a ban mean for TikTok creators?

Many are trying to move followers to other platforms like YouTube and Triller, an entertainment platform built for creators. Some are trying to monetize through sites like Patreon, a crowdfunding platform for artists, musicians and other creators, said Amber Atherton, CEO at Zyper, a community marketing platform that connects brands with the top one per cent of their superfans.

Atherton said teens will continue to access TikTok anyway through a virtual private network in the same way that teens access Instagram in China. But she said teenagers are devastated about a ban, since TikTok is about everyday people where users can discover product demos and other information.

TikTok creators are seen making a video in Paris on May 29. (Felipe Lopez/AFP via Getty Images)

What are the political consequences of a ban on TikTok?

Industry officials say that any ban could invoke some retaliation from China against U.S. businesses.

"It could make many companies wary of the U.S. government's capricious decisions, which leads to instability and uncertainty, " said Sucharita Kodali, an analyst at Forrester Research, an e-commerce research firm.

"Investors then opt to park capital in more stable, predictable environments. Something of this nature is relatively uncommon. Usually, it happens when there are sanctions or other major political action."

China is colonizing Africa


China is colonizing Africa

Rise of the Red Dragon...2017

encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ...

Rise of the Red Dragon
Michael Salla: China's Secret Space Program Webinar 10/17

Saturday, August 1, 2020

Chinese researcher accused of hiding military links taken into custody in San Francisco – reports

Chinese researcher accused of hiding military links taken into custody in San Francisco – reports


Chinese researcher accused of hiding military links taken into custody in San Francisco – reports
Fugitive Chinese biologist is taken into US custody for lying ...
A Chinese researcher accused of concealing her military past has been taken into custody, Reuters says, citing a senior US Justice Department official. She was hiding out at the Chinese Consulate in San Francisco.

The researcher, Juan Tang, applied for a visa in 2019 and responded “no” when asked if she had ever served in the Chinese military. When the FBI found a picture of Tang in a military uniform, an arrest warrant was served earlier this week. 

Tang – who worked at the University of California, Davis – sought refuge in San Francisco’s Chinese Consulate. However, an anonymous Justice Department official told Reuters on Friday that she was detained the previous evening.

Tang is one of four Chinese researchers accused of hiding their links with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China. The three others, Chen Song, Kaikai Zhao, and Xin Wang, have all been arrested and charged, while the FBI warned that more of their colleagues are operating in over 25 American cities.

ALSO ON RT.COMUS claims China hides ‘military spy scientist’ at SF consulate; Beijing calls it bias-motivated harassment

Beijing has strongly condemned the crackdown. “For some time, the US has held ideological bias to continuously surveil, harass and even arbitrarily detain Chinese students and scholars,” a Foreign Ministry spokesman said on Thursday, urging the US to “stop using any excuse to restrict, harass or oppress Chinese students and researchers.”

In Washington, however, there seems to be no appetite for rapprochement. The FBI's National Security Assistant Director John Brown said the charges against the four researchers show “the extreme lengths to which the Chinese government has gone to infiltrate and exploit America’s benevolence.” In a separate statement on Thursday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described the “tentacles of the Chinese Communist Party” as a threat to the “free world,” and called on allied nations to challenge Beijing.

ALSO ON RT.COMIf China seeks world domination, should the US keep doing business with it? FBI chief Wray seems to want it both ways

The State Department ordered the closure of a Chinese consulate in Houston, Texas, this week, accusing staff there of intellectual property theft. In a tit-for-tat response, China ordered the US to close its own facility in the Chinese city of Chengdu on Friday morning.

Anti-China rhetoric is nothing new from Washington. President Donald Trump has overseen a trade war against Beijing for more than two years, and has portrayed the coronavirus pandemic as the fault of the Chinese government. However, the recent escalation of tensions also has a domestic political element. With just over three months to go until the presidential election, Republicans have bashed their Democratic opponents for being “soft on China.” Trump in particular has claimed that the Chinese are “desperate” to see Joe Biden win in November, “so they can continue to rip-off the United States.”

US officials are apparently also threatened by China’s rapidly growing economy, predicted to overtake the US in the 2030s. Attorney General William Barr played to this fear last week, accusing China of running an “economic blitzkrieg,” whose aim is to “seize the commanding heights of the global economy and to surpass the US as the world’s preeminent technological superpower.”

OZ plans to be armed against China, China takes over the Pacific



OZ plans to be armed against China


China takes over the Pacific

China Stole At Least $1 Billion In Trade Secrets & Research From US: State Dept


China Stole At Least $1 Billion In Trade Secrets & Research From US: State Dept

by Tyler Durden Thu, 07/23/2020


After this week the FBI said the Chinese government is acting like "an organized criminal syndicate" for widespread cyber theft and hacking of American trade secrets as well as coronavirus research, State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus said on Thursday it's estimated that China stole at least $1 billion total in research from the United States. She further identified the Chinese consulate in Houston, which the US has ordered closed and to "cease all operations and events," as being "the epicenter" of the alleged research theft. China's PLA file image, AFP/Getty Mike Pompeo is expected to further address the matter this morning, as well as possibly the search for a Chinese military researcher in California wanted by the FBI, but who subsequently was given safe harbor in the Chinese consulate in San Francisco. An angered Beijing has vowed to issue reciprocal measures in the wake of the Houston consulate closure. But China's foreign ministry has been vowing such a response also in the wake of human rights abuse related sanctions the Trump administrations rolled out earlier this month. Nothing significant has yet to materialize, however, as it appears Beijing is looking for an off-ramp amid the intense Washington pressure campaign. So far it remains at the level of serious counter-threats: 
Image

Meanwhile, all of this is just in time for a major gathering for China's top decision-making body: "...scheduled for the end of this month, it will be closely watched by economists and analysts keen on sussing out signals from the top Chinese leadership over what Beijing will do next, after the nation saw surprising economic growth in the second quarter. At the mid-year meeting of the 25-member Politburo of the ruling Communist Party, President Xi Jinping is expected to set the tone for future economic policies in the second half of the year and even beyond." Recall that previously foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian promised that “In response to the wrongful move by the US, China has decided to take reciprocal action against institutions and individuals who have acted egregiously on Xinjiang affairs.” Thus we could finally see what these big measures are following the Politburo meeting soon to take place by close of this month.