Keeping an eye on Communist, Totalitarian China, and its influence both globally, and we as Canadians. I have come to the opinion that we are rarely privy to truth regarding the real goal, the agenda of Red China, and it's implications for Canada [and North America as a whole]. No more can we rely on our media as more and more information on China is actively being swept under the carpet - not for consumption.
China asks people not to eat rats, bats and snakes
In the Chinese New Year, Chinese people use such foods to 'surprise'. Snakes or rats are common in Canton province.
From Efe Agency
Foods made with rats are common in China (Photo: Reuters)
Within days of Chinese citizens gathering to celebrate the local New Year, the Chinese government launched a campaign to prevent the spread of viruses caused by eating "rare" foods, such as rats, snakes and bats.
The body responsible for food security asked citizens not to eat "wild animals" and, above all, not to innovate, as in some parts of the country it is common for the Chinese to try to surprise this date with recipes made from "unusual" animals.
In the southern province of Canton, the Chinese taste snakes or rats, so the government has asked that at least children and pregnant women not taste "rare dishes".
The authorities announced the beginning of inspections across the country to try to reduce the diseases caused by eating this type of food during the New Year festival, called in China "Spring Festival", which will be held on February 19.
At this party, Chinese citizens celebrate the passage of the year from horse to sheep, according to the Chinese horoscope .
Scientist and scholar Eric Toner, quoted above in an excerpt from a Friday interview with the business-news channel CNBC, explained that China’s efforts to contain the current outbreak of a fast-moving upper-respiratory illness are “unlikely to be effective.”
Cases of the illness, which is related to SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, and MERS, Middle East respirator syndrome, have now turned up in a number of countries beyond China, where the illness originated in Wuhan City.
Beijing has shut down parts of the Great Wall, as well as more than a dozen cities, restricting the movement of some 50 million people, and canceling events related to the Lunar New Year, one of the busiest periods of travel and consumerism in the country.
CNBC reported that Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam has declared a virus emergency in the city of 7.3 million, extending school cancellations until Feb. 17 and barring visits to mainland China.
On Monday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said at least 110 people in 26 states have been identified as persons under investigation for coronavirus, but only five officials cases have occurred thus far, including one in Arizona and California.
Coronaviruses, with SARS and MERS among that group, are infections of the respiratory tract that can lead to illnesses like pneumonia or the common cold.
Toner told Business insider during an interview that he hasn’t completed research on the current strain of the Wuhan coronavirus, known as 2019-nCoV, but said that the death toll could run in the millions if the influenza were resistant to modern vaccines and was as easy to catch as the common flu.
To be sure, an outbreak of SARS about 17 years ago claimed nearly 800 lives and infected more than 8,000 people around the world. However, the death toll from that 2002-03 disease was nowhere near a million.
Toner said that his coronavirus simulation “was not [focused primarily on] the number of deaths; it was to point out that there could be societal and economic consequences from a severe pandemic, not just health consequences.” The simulation was also geared toward engendering international cooperation, making the case that governments and private companies alone can’t adequately respond to a pandemic.
One report estimates that a pandemic could cause an average annual economic loss of 0.7% of global GDP — or $570 billion.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization late this week wasn’t sounding global alarm bells about the illness either, declaring the coronavirus an emergency in China on Thursday but falling short of calling the outbreak an international emergency. U.S. health officials also have said that the risk domestically from the illness is low.
The Journal on Sunday reported that millions of residents from the outbreak’s epicenter, in Wuhan City, may have scattered around the country to visit family for the annual Lunar New Year holiday, before the lockdowns were put in place.
Zhou Xianwang, the Mayor of Wuhan, shared a similar view. He estimated that some 5 million people may have left the city before travel restrictions were imposed.
VANCOUVER—Vancouver and Toronto are the “lightning rod” cities likeliest to get hit by a mysterious virus that has killed at least nine people in China, one expert said Tuesday, hours after the first North American case was confirmed in Washington state, not far from the border with B.C.
Still, Eleanor Fish, an immunology professor at the University of Toronto, said Canada’s SARS-era screening and quarantine strategies are the best bet to catch and contain the virus should it arrive in this country.
As of Monday, the B.C. Centre for Disease Control had posted a notice to its website calling risk to Canadians “low,” but saying that airports in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver would tell passengers travelling from China they must tell a border agent if they felt unwell.
The BC Centre for Disease Control has developed a diagnostic test for the new coronavirus, which is different from the SARS outbreak when there was no similar test.
Public health teams have also implemented screening for early detection of infections for travellers arriving in airports.
In Wuhan — one of China’s largest cities and a hub for industry and technology — the yet-to-be-officially-named coronavirus caused an outbreak of severe pneumonia among people who frequented a seafood market there late last month. Health authorities have reported 198 cases in the city, and the virus has also spread to Thailand, Japan and South Korea.
Authorities announced this week that human-to-human transmission has been confirmed in the outbreak, raising fears the illness could spread more quickly and widely.
Fish, who studied the SARS outbreak in 2003, said it’s possible the mysterious virus will appear in Canada, because of the large amount of international flights that arrive here.
“I’ve always said there are two places in Canada that are lightning rods: Vancouver and Toronto,” she said. “Because there are diverse populations there from all over the world.”
But, she said, Canada’s history with SARS should reassure the public that if the coronavirus arrives in this country, it can be contained.
“After the SARS outbreak, Canada became a leader in our ability to put protocols in place,” Fish said, pointing out that the people who got sick from SARS in Canada were health-care workers in contact with patients who had picked up the virus abroad. “People from around the world came to Canada to find out how we had done this.”
The patient in the confirmed coronavirus case in the U.S. returned to the Seattle area in the middle of last week after travelling to the Wuhan area. The man is in his 30s and is in good condition at a hospital in Everett, outside Seattle.
A statement on Canada’s Public Health Agency website said this country’s chief public health officer is working with provincial chief medical officers to make sure the virus is identified and managed if it shows up in Canada.
Fish, whose research centres on antiviral drugs that could target a broad spectrum of viruses, from Ebola to bird flu, said the spread of the coronavirus should serve as a wakeup call for Canada on how to prepare for new and unknown viruses of the future.
“Maybe it’s time that, globally, we sat down and said, ‘OK, stop focusing on the specific virus, but look at the host, humans,’” she said. “We could dedicate some funds toward establishing an armory of antivirals that we could actually treat people with.”
The Public Health Agency of Canada issued a notice warning travellers to China, expected to increase this week for lunar New Year, to avoid contact with animals and sick people.
By Zoe KleinmanTechnology reporter, BBC NewsJan 25 2020
The UK government is expected to decide on Tuesday whether to ban equipment made by Chinese technology giant Huawei from its 5G networks.
The US is lobbying the UK to exclude it on the grounds of national security.
Huawei insists it would never take orders from the Chinese government.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson is chairing a meeting of the National Security Council at which the decision will be made - although it may not be announced immediately.
There is speculation Mr Johnson might choose to ban Huawei from the "core" parts of the networks only.
The core carries out essential functions such as authenticating subscribers and sending voice and data between devices and is sometimes described as the "brains" or "heart" of a network.
Speaking to reporters today Mr Johnson said he wanted a system that delivers "consumer benefits" without compromising national infrastructure, security or the UK's relationships with other intelligence agencies.
"We are going to come up with a solution that enables us to achieve both those objectives and that is the way forward," he said.
Former Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt told BBC Radio 4's Today programme he "wondered whether it was wise" for the UK to become "technologically dependent on another country".
"I would say if the decision goes the other way this week, as some of the signs seem to indicate it might, I hope there will also be some reflection in the US, because we have never needed the Western alliance to be stronger than now," he said.
In all of the reporting of the Huawei story a couple of things are often ignored. There’s not one single UK 5G network but 4, and three of them are already rolling out with Huawei - here right at the heart of the city of London
And while Telefonica's O2 has not widely deployed Huawei's equipment to date, it is engaged in a network-sharing agreement with Vodafone, so would still be affected.
Ericsson and Nokia offer alternative products to Huawei's - but they are more expensive.
"The slightly ironic thing is that of the four networks installing 5G, most still use 4G infrastructure - and of the bit that is 5G today, all are using Huawei," Prof Alan Woodward, from Surrey University, said.
Huawei says it has worked with UK telecoms companies for 15 years.
"We are confident that the UK government will make a decision based upon evidence, as opposed to unsubstantiated allegations," it said in an earlier statement.