You don`t know what`s going on in these big houses .. in Vancouver it could be gang wars
Nov 8th, 2007 | By Dominic Berry
A Gang War in the Lower Mainland?

According to the Vancouver Sun on Wednesday, November 7: “We’re obviously extremely concerned about this escalation of violence and potential for innocent victims to be hurt and killed,’ Vancouver police Deputy Chief Doug LePard told reporters Tuesday. I would not say it’s necessarily truly a gang war,’ he explained. There clearly is a conflict between two or more gangs right now…. It’s not a classic dispute between one gang trying to take over the territory of another gang.’”

Similarly (perhaps), in the most recent case of Mr. Abhari and Mr. Raj: “Police sources say Abhari, the passenger and a mid-level drug dealer, was probably the target. Both men are believed to have been in a downtown club and on their way home … A friend of Raj’s told theVancouver Sun that the 31-year-old native of Fiji was not involved in gang activity. He was a good friend to everyone and always wanted those around him to have a good time,’ said James Milacic … As for what the media says about it being a targeted incident, maybe for the other person, I doubt it was for Shakeel,’ Milacic said. Shakeel was a very kind and caring person. … The police are making him out to be a gang member, and I assure you, he is not ‘in’ a gang’ … Raj co-owned a Port Moody house assessed at $802,000, according to property records and leased a Cadillac Escalade, in addition to the Silver Mercedes in which he was killed.”

According to a November 7 report in the Vancouver Province: “At least four gang battles are raging in the Lower Mainland, a police expert said in the wake of a double killing early Tuesday morning … This is not one gang war. There are four gang wars,’ said the police officer, a Lower Mainland gang specialist, adding that a fifth war is also brewing … There are different battles raging for street-level drug profits,’ said the police source … Meanwhile, a high-ranking Vancouver officer yesterday called on the province to revisit the funding devoted to stopping gangs … We are overwhelmed with the number of people out there that are involved in drug trafficking and are involved in gun violence,’ said Deputy Chief Bob Rich.”

The report carried on: “We have to stop the killing and safeguard the public,’ Vancouver police Chief Jim Chu said Wednesday in announcing the latest strategy aimed at quelling a recent spike of gang violence that has claimed four lives on Vancouver streets within a week and 19 so far this year across the region … Starting next week, the new Violence Suppression Team, whose officers will wear the title emblazoned on their jackets, will start aggressively getting in the faces’ of known gangsters at night clubs, their homes, their cars and their known hangouts region-wide.”
What does it all tell us about life in our big city regions today?

Then the prime minister went on to link gang wars in the Lower Mainland on the Pacific coast up with his narrower political objectives, way back east in Ottawa: “But in the first session of this minority Parliament,” he told the Vancouver Board of Trade, “the opposition parties held up five critical pieces of anti-crime legislation. This is unacceptable. That is why we have now tabled the Comprehensive Tackling Violent Crime Act and made it a measure of confidence.”

The mayor went on: “Sullivan said .. that, while he has faith that the Vancouver Police Department will address the problem, enforcement is not the answer.’ As the Vancouver Police Department was announcing a new gang task force, Sullivan – who heads the police board – said the city instead needs more money from Ottawa.” The federal government is “cutting taxes – and, at the city level, we have to deal with the guns and gangs and drugs. We are very much pressured by our budgets,’ Sullivan said.”

You might think that this is just more self-serving political claptrap in its own right. But think about it all for just a minute longer. It is interesting to learn lurid details about such things as the Big Circle Boys, from the Mounties and other sources. Born back in the days of the Red Guards in China, they are now “arguably the largest, most expansive and successful triad” extant. Theircurrent organization is “international in scope” and since ”first appearing in the United States in the early 1990s, it has set up cells in New York, Boston, Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Vancouver.” The organization is now said to be “responsible for importing much of the Southeast Asian heroin entering Canada – much of which is then smuggled into the United States – and is the source for many of the counterfeit credit cards used in North America.”

The most appalling irony is that political leaders like Mr. Harper and Mr. Flaherty, who, as matter of highly misguided ideological (and they say even constitutional) principle, are systematically draining much-needed public funds away from urban local governments, are also claiming that they in fact have the right policies to address the “the growing problem of gun, gang and drug crime.” It is hardly any wonder that the sovereign people who live in Canada’s biggest city regions – and who have a much better practical grasp of what the current crime and gang warfare issue in these places is all about – will not vote for such political leaders.

Tax cuts, tax cuts, and more tax cuts, from the narrow-minded and all too mean-spirited (to say nothing of increasingly obsolete) minority neo-con politicians in Ottawa, Ontario are just going to make the stalwart (if no doubt altogether crazy) criminals who run the Big Circle Boys, to say nothing of “an emerging gang called the United Nations,” laugh, and laugh, and laugh. The poorer and weaker our free and democratic governments are, the happier our criminals will be. Only people who live in very vast rural and rurban mansions, far from all madding urban crowds, can fail to see the plain truth of such simple propositions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments always welcome!